Dan V
Well-known member
[quote="fordham96" post=292846][quote="Dan V" post=292845][quote="redmannorth" post=292831][quote="Dan V" post=292830][quote="fordham96" post=292712]The biggest issue is talent accumulation and depth, period. The idea they are losing games because if in game coaching is nonsense. They need to recruit better, period. Both talent and depth on a more consistent basis. This year clearly is lining up to be best year, but this staff was not hired to be a 1 in 4 year staff. It was to be good every year and to set their sets on competing with Nova for BE titles.
To do that you need players. That is where a solid assistant with grass roots connections can help.[/quote]
Yes its true but you make it sound as if recruiting talented players is all it takes and thats definitely not true in college basketball. Johnny Jones had Ben Simmons and Antonio Blakeney and a bunch of 4 star guys at LSU and they were terrible. In college you need good coaching you cant just roll the balls out expect to win big, it just doesnt work that way. The best coaches maximize their talent anyway. Brad Stevens went to back to back title games with 3 star or lower ranked players. Even without Stevens Butler still keeps winning with similarly ranked players as SJU.[/quote]
Fordham96 said talent and depth. We had no depth last year. This year we return our three key starters who should all play 30 minutes a game , substitute Keita for Owens and hopefully Figueroa can replace Bashir. Then we have four unproven big east players and Trimble not including Heron. We should be much better as all four new BE players plus Trimble should be able to give us 10 minutes a game. Even without Heron we finally have limited depth.[/quote]
Yes I read his post and my point still stands. Depth while great to have is not neccessary to win in college basketball. Just ask Eric Musselman who knows more about basketball than all 3 of us combined. Not every national champion has had depth. Villanova last year, Duke in '15, Kentucky in '12, UConn in '11, UNC in '09, Kansas in '08, Florida in '07 and '06, UConn in '04, Maryland in '02, etc... all ran 6 or 7 man rotations which is 5 starters and 1 or 2 guys off the bench. The excuses have to stop. Honestly Ponds, Simon, Ahmed, Clark, Owens, Trimble, Yakwe should of been enough for us not to lose 11 big east games in a row last year. Beating Duke and Nova proved that, its not even an argument to be honest just be real. I dont hate Mullin at all really I just want to win. Yeah we should make the dance next year easily (+Heron) and have enough talent to win some games when we get there. Im just worried we will underachieve because of the lack of coaching experience. Its a geniune concern people are not on here complaining for no reason, they've watched enough ball to see that. Its annoying to me when people refuse to address issues because they just want to be happy and not think about things, you know what i call that, being a sheep.[/quote]
That is not my point. Of course coaching matters the point is though the BIGGEST reason the first 3 seasons have turned out the way they have is lack of talent and depth. Period. People think they are 12-42 because he needs a sideline guru, that is nonsense. The single biggest issue with this program has been depth and talent. Cant get to coaching until that is solved ][/quote]
Not talking about the first 2 years, I mentioned only last year. Never mentioned anything about an assistant coach if thats what you meant by sideline guru, im talking about the HEAD coach's lack of experience. Once again your missing the point. Hopefully you feel like this upcoming year we have enough that we can "get to coaching".
To do that you need players. That is where a solid assistant with grass roots connections can help.[/quote]
Yes its true but you make it sound as if recruiting talented players is all it takes and thats definitely not true in college basketball. Johnny Jones had Ben Simmons and Antonio Blakeney and a bunch of 4 star guys at LSU and they were terrible. In college you need good coaching you cant just roll the balls out expect to win big, it just doesnt work that way. The best coaches maximize their talent anyway. Brad Stevens went to back to back title games with 3 star or lower ranked players. Even without Stevens Butler still keeps winning with similarly ranked players as SJU.[/quote]
Fordham96 said talent and depth. We had no depth last year. This year we return our three key starters who should all play 30 minutes a game , substitute Keita for Owens and hopefully Figueroa can replace Bashir. Then we have four unproven big east players and Trimble not including Heron. We should be much better as all four new BE players plus Trimble should be able to give us 10 minutes a game. Even without Heron we finally have limited depth.[/quote]
Yes I read his post and my point still stands. Depth while great to have is not neccessary to win in college basketball. Just ask Eric Musselman who knows more about basketball than all 3 of us combined. Not every national champion has had depth. Villanova last year, Duke in '15, Kentucky in '12, UConn in '11, UNC in '09, Kansas in '08, Florida in '07 and '06, UConn in '04, Maryland in '02, etc... all ran 6 or 7 man rotations which is 5 starters and 1 or 2 guys off the bench. The excuses have to stop. Honestly Ponds, Simon, Ahmed, Clark, Owens, Trimble, Yakwe should of been enough for us not to lose 11 big east games in a row last year. Beating Duke and Nova proved that, its not even an argument to be honest just be real. I dont hate Mullin at all really I just want to win. Yeah we should make the dance next year easily (+Heron) and have enough talent to win some games when we get there. Im just worried we will underachieve because of the lack of coaching experience. Its a geniune concern people are not on here complaining for no reason, they've watched enough ball to see that. Its annoying to me when people refuse to address issues because they just want to be happy and not think about things, you know what i call that, being a sheep.[/quote]
That is not my point. Of course coaching matters the point is though the BIGGEST reason the first 3 seasons have turned out the way they have is lack of talent and depth. Period. People think they are 12-42 because he needs a sideline guru, that is nonsense. The single biggest issue with this program has been depth and talent. Cant get to coaching until that is solved ][/quote]
Not talking about the first 2 years, I mentioned only last year. Never mentioned anything about an assistant coach if thats what you meant by sideline guru, im talking about the HEAD coach's lack of experience. Once again your missing the point. Hopefully you feel like this upcoming year we have enough that we can "get to coaching".