JohnnyFan" post=410821 said:
Beast:
Thanks for your respnse, which I would imagine just narrowly qualifies as a non-political post.
Regarding Pfizer, they got a $1.95 billion deal with the government’s Operation Warp Speed to deliver 100 million doses of the vaccine. The arrangement is an
advance-purchase agreement, meaning that the company doesn’t get paid until/unless they deliver the vaccines. Pfizer did not accept federal funding to help develop or manufacture the vaccine, unlike front-runners Moderna and AstraZeneca. (
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/10/health/was-the-pfizer-vaccine-part-of-the-governments-operation-warp-speed.html[/URL]]NY Times -11/10/20[/url])
As far as vaccine distribution, this is the most significant health/economic crisis of our lifetimes. The federal government took the lead on purchasing and now controls supply of the vaccine which is the most critical resource on the planet. "Leaving it up to the states" has already proven to be a failed approach when it comes to pandemic response. The federal government needs to execute with more urgency and, whether they like it or not, they do bare responsibility for this rollout. If their strategy is "leaving it up to the states" and that fails, they are responsibile. The governement's chief function is to protect it's people.
Yes, CTstorm read my post correctly, I was referring to AstraZeneca's trial reports (not Moderna). But, considering your graduate course, I will defer to you on that.
Staying in bounds is one of the basic rules in basketball. The pandemic is all about governmental response and is worthy of discussion.
I am aware that Pfizer turned down investment money, but don't be mistaken in thinking that a $2 billion investment by the US in purchasing the vaccine from them didn't help fund their invest in R&D They knew so long as it got approved, maybe among many companies with an approved vaccine, that they had a $2 billion customer. Smart move by our government.
The federal government didn't simply take the lead on purchasing,but outright invested in R&D in return for finished product if drug companies won approval. They took the risk away from failed research, which is incredibly bright and allowed the selected companies to move rapidly through phases by interleaving them at a research feasible point and not an econimically feasible point.
We will have to disagree on distribution and the feds yielding responsibility to states. This is an age old argument, and many southerners still firmly believe that the civil war was primarily about state's rights and the federal government's ability to dictate to them.
Our leadership had a weekly call with all 50 governors invited and expected to attend to give updates and share opinions and ideas. 17 governors declined the invitiation, including our own here in NYS. Many of those governors wanted autonomy in dealing with the pandemic. One went so far as to appoint his own review panel to approve any vaccine, whic is absurd considering that I sincerely doubt his panel had any regulatory experience in the drug approval process.
Poorly run states, and those who ascribe to good ol boy political favors are bungling distribution as they have bungled everything it seems.
I can appreciate your displeasure and would agree with much of it. Every single day I see photo ops of people who should NOT be in phase one of vaccination getting vaccinated. Last night I flipped when I saw a post of a maybe 35-40 year old CEO of a community health center who presumably is not patient facing, getting the vaccine and posting about it. We know that politicians are doing the same. These are the same people who shut down their states but are caught at restaurants in private dinners without PPE, tell people to stay home for the holidays, but are caught at airports, advising us to stay apart from our families but then celebrate with their elderly parents who live far away.
Vaccinating 300 people is an unprecendented task. I have zero confidence that our state or federal government can do it well. In fact, government should largely stay the hell out of healthcare in my opinion. They have little knowledge, no experience, drive up costs, and in general use anything at their disposal to line their pockets. I guarantee that if a single payor system is implemented, anyone with sufficient means will opt out to get better healthcare.
The best route possible is to get this done as throughly as possible, and look past the obvious hypocrisies and errors that are going to occur.