beast of the east
Active member
The article cited 6 reactions to the vaccine, and did not describe what the reactions were. Millions of first of two injections have already been administered.
People, including physicians often do not distinguish between adverse reactions to a drug and a true allergic reactions to an agent. Even hypersensitivity to an agent and an allergy are two different things. All agents have adverse side effects.
Bottom line, this as all agents. Is risk benefit. 300,000 americans have died, and millions have been infected. The benefit to the public vs. six severe reported reactions is an insane discussion to have at this point, which will only dissuade individuals from getting the vaccine. Best advice - if you have a history of hypersensitivity to drugs or other vaccines, perhaps wait until more data is available. Everyone else, get it.
I'll defer to the most qualified person here to discuss this, CTSTORM, who is a distinguished professor of pharmacology and a phD.
Thankful for front line clinicians like mcnpa and others here
People, including physicians often do not distinguish between adverse reactions to a drug and a true allergic reactions to an agent. Even hypersensitivity to an agent and an allergy are two different things. All agents have adverse side effects.
Bottom line, this as all agents. Is risk benefit. 300,000 americans have died, and millions have been infected. The benefit to the public vs. six severe reported reactions is an insane discussion to have at this point, which will only dissuade individuals from getting the vaccine. Best advice - if you have a history of hypersensitivity to drugs or other vaccines, perhaps wait until more data is available. Everyone else, get it.
I'll defer to the most qualified person here to discuss this, CTSTORM, who is a distinguished professor of pharmacology and a phD.
Thankful for front line clinicians like mcnpa and others here
Last edited: