Those who are not in the don't worry, be somewhat happy camp are those who want this team to be really good and think without a big man it's just another year of mediocrity. I think that's probably correct but it's likely a higher level of mediocrity than last year's, and last year the team won 7 conference games and 3 wins overall from a winning record. The low bar for next year is a .500 record in conference and a winning record overall. That's good, but it's not really good (and far from great but that's the target for a longer term future). How much better Simon and Clark are than Ellison and Williams will be measured in wins and wins only. How much better a new decent big would be than RF is probably more impactful to getting the most wins. That's how a lot think about this situation.
There isn't a single poster on here who would turn away a competent big man. The point Logen and fun and others are making is that the staff does not have a significant chunk of playing time to offer such a big man.
Maybe not, but he's be assured of playing the last 10minutes if we had the lead, just to rebound and be a inside presense. Yeah, I guess Ponds will be rebounding alot huh?
We'll have Lovett and Ponds who I'm thinking will improve from last year and Simon who people are saying is the real deal, so the big man would have guys feeding him the rock inside.
I don't get it either, we can't even get a 2 star recruit??? Yeah, something is up.
Hoping Owens improves alot and stays out of foul trouble, same with Yakwe, otherwise we're F'eddddd