lawmanfan post=437154 said:Things continue to move in the direction I have expected them to for a number of years: The football schools will follow the money and conferences will realign and consolidate accordingly.
As Moose correctly points out, the Big 12 is done. The Big 10 and the PAC-12 will probably split up what's left of it. It frankly wouldn't shock me if the Big 10 poaches some of the PAC-12, leaving the rest of the PAC-12 to absorb the Big 12.
Since I don't care about college football, none of that concerns me. What concerns me is that the real message here is that the SEC is essentially going to ditch the NCAA and its rules. The remaining 3 power conferences will follow suit.
At that point the question is whether the Power 64 teams want to bother participating in the NCAA basketball tournament. If they don't then that does not bode well for the Big East.
As Fordham correctly pointed out wrt Kansas, basketball is almost totally irrelevant in the college sports money game, so hopefully the split will be football-only and the NCAA tournament will continue in its present form.
Of course what competitive disadvantage the non-Power 64 schools will be at is a different question, but smart programs always manage to find a way on that front.
I think Pac 12 is in a strong position to either pick the Big 12 bones clean, or go a different direction such as SDSU, etc.JohnnyFan post=437177 said:Regarding the Mountain West Conference, I could see a major conference approaching San Diego State.
Paultzman post=437323 said:Big 12’s “cease & desist” to ESPN claims network contacted other conferences "encouraging” them to take Big 12 schools so Big 12 dissolves, eliminating grant of rights, sources told @Stadium. If Big 12 implodes, ESPN not responsible for final 4 years of deal, worth $1.06 billion
https://twitter.com/brett_mcmurphy/status/1420510030722486275?s=21
Big East should have sued them (Maryland actually did as they decided to leave the ACC) but didn’t and if the league was too “chicken” to do so, individual schools could/should have done so.Mean Gene post=437334 said:Paultzman post=437323 said:Big 12’s “cease & desist” to ESPN claims network contacted other conferences "encouraging” them to take Big 12 schools so Big 12 dissolves, eliminating grant of rights, sources told @Stadium. If Big 12 implodes, ESPN not responsible for final 4 years of deal, worth $1.06 billion
https://twitter.com/brett_mcmurphy/status/1420510030722486275?s=21
ESPN has been behind all of this realignment from the beginning when Big East was broken apart. The Big East should have sued ESPN back then as they pulled the same shit. Someone has to take them to task.
L J S A post=437402 said:I've now read in three different places that the Big 10 is going to pursue USC. That's crazy.
USC is one of the few schools that has a football history that rivals Texas and Oklahoma. I guess they aren't worried about the New Jersey to California footprint. It seems crazy doesn't matter anymore.
L J S A post=437402 said:I've now read in three different places that the Big 10 is going to pursue USC. That's crazy.
I googled what you said and found this interesting article on some Iowa Hawkeyes website.
[URL]https://www.hawkcentral.com/st...ealignment-big-12-sec-pac-12-ncaa/5413254001/[/URL]
L J S A post=437402 said:I've now read in three different places that the Big 10 is going to pursue USC. That's crazy.
I thought that too about Clemson, but you've got to figure they are probably making the playoffs 18 of the next 20 seasons from where they are. Easier to get dinged a bit along the road to the playoffs in the SEC.AlexSTJ post=437474 said:I’m surprised Clemson, and FSU aren’t as heavily involved in SEC talks. Despite backlash from Florida and South Carolina.