beast of the east
Active member
[quote="MCNPA" post=288576][quote="JohnnyFan" post=288574][quote="MCNPA" post=288566]Two things remain true here.
1) We are willingly running a team without an Associate Head Coach and have no coaches on the roster who have been coaches at the D1 college level except Matt. Matt is solely a recruiter for us and a good one. We are actually running 2 coaches short with Richmond as I’m not sure what his deal is.
2) we were again last place in year 3.
I don’t know if it’s Mullin’s idea, or whose it is, but whomever decided we don’t need that extra staff member or two is an idiot. If we were at the top of the league, once could make the argument we don’t need it. That extra spot could be used for either and ace recruiter and/or an experienced coach, or both. If we didn’t need it, we wouldn’t have been in last place, bottom line. It’s idiotic and there are no programs running less 1-2 valuable coaching spots filled because well... it’s a terrible idea and deserves criticism.
The thread should not be about “if” we are going to have staff changes, rather about “when” we will hire the vacant spot of Associate Head Coach. After that’s done, we can address the ineffective and/or nonexistent coaches on staff if that is he case like many feel it is.[/quote]
Although they seem like conflicting opinions, I will agree with both NC Johnnie and MCNPA. From a roster standpoint, things are indeed looking up. That said, I would like to see us seize the moment. The program often seems snake bit. So, ignoring obvious needs makes me me think.......THIS is why we never get over the hump.
Let's hope Mullin can check his ego and ensure we are doing absolutely everything possible to move the program forward.[/quote]
There should be no hoping here. Hire an Associate HC. Shouldn’t even be an option for us, just a given. Hire a damn Associate HC. Period. This shouldn’t be an option. A DOBO is an option. An Associate HC isn’t. I’d rather cut Ritchie and Matic and whomever and grab somebody with experience coaching at the college level and who is at least a decent recruiter. Use their salaries towards that. There’s really no excuse at this point not to do so[/quote]
If I had to guess, our athletic giving doesn't come close to programs that may act as you suggest. We only have to look in the mirror collectively to see why the school doesn't toss more money around. Keep in mind that revenue producing sports have to help support an entire deoartment.
1) We are willingly running a team without an Associate Head Coach and have no coaches on the roster who have been coaches at the D1 college level except Matt. Matt is solely a recruiter for us and a good one. We are actually running 2 coaches short with Richmond as I’m not sure what his deal is.
2) we were again last place in year 3.
I don’t know if it’s Mullin’s idea, or whose it is, but whomever decided we don’t need that extra staff member or two is an idiot. If we were at the top of the league, once could make the argument we don’t need it. That extra spot could be used for either and ace recruiter and/or an experienced coach, or both. If we didn’t need it, we wouldn’t have been in last place, bottom line. It’s idiotic and there are no programs running less 1-2 valuable coaching spots filled because well... it’s a terrible idea and deserves criticism.
The thread should not be about “if” we are going to have staff changes, rather about “when” we will hire the vacant spot of Associate Head Coach. After that’s done, we can address the ineffective and/or nonexistent coaches on staff if that is he case like many feel it is.[/quote]
Although they seem like conflicting opinions, I will agree with both NC Johnnie and MCNPA. From a roster standpoint, things are indeed looking up. That said, I would like to see us seize the moment. The program often seems snake bit. So, ignoring obvious needs makes me me think.......THIS is why we never get over the hump.
Let's hope Mullin can check his ego and ensure we are doing absolutely everything possible to move the program forward.[/quote]
There should be no hoping here. Hire an Associate HC. Shouldn’t even be an option for us, just a given. Hire a damn Associate HC. Period. This shouldn’t be an option. A DOBO is an option. An Associate HC isn’t. I’d rather cut Ritchie and Matic and whomever and grab somebody with experience coaching at the college level and who is at least a decent recruiter. Use their salaries towards that. There’s really no excuse at this point not to do so[/quote]
If I had to guess, our athletic giving doesn't come close to programs that may act as you suggest. We only have to look in the mirror collectively to see why the school doesn't toss more money around. Keep in mind that revenue producing sports have to help support an entire deoartment.