So after tonight should Lavin...

Fine. As for Lavin's contract extension? Sold to you.

Sold to me? Kinda vague.
See
Nevertheless, I debunked your argument and now you're moving the backboard. Good job.

“Sold to you” is vague? Ok….I’ll spell it out. After this disaster of a season, I’m not buying Lavin’s PR campaign to have his contract extended. You seem to be buying it. Sold to you.

Oh, and I know you’ll especially enjoy the 2015 season, when the “youngest team in America” puts “hammer to rock” as it embarks upon its “life lessons.”

How do I seem to be buying it, as you say?

Nowhere you can find such. Thank you for building another strawman. I can spread it around some shrubbery.

You're starting to remind me of someone with your constant straw man and moving of backboards.
 
Fine. As for Lavin's contract extension? Sold to you.

Sold to me? Kinda vague.
See
Nevertheless, I debunked your argument and now you're moving the backboard. Good job.

“Sold to you” is vague? Ok….I’ll spell it out. After this disaster of a season, I’m not buying Lavin’s PR campaign to have his contract extended. You seem to be buying it. Sold to you.

Oh, and I know you’ll especially enjoy the 2015 season, when the “youngest team in America” puts “hammer to rock” as it embarks upon its “life lessons.”

How do I seem to be buying it, as you say?

Nowhere you can find such. Thank you for building another strawman. I can spread it around some shrubbery.

You're starting to remind me of someone with your constant straw man and moving of backboards.

I'm not moving any backboard.

Do you think his contract should be extended? Yes or no?
 
Fine. As for Lavin's contract extension? Sold to you.

Sold to me? Kinda vague.
See
Nevertheless, I debunked your argument and now you're moving the backboard. Good job.

“Sold to you” is vague? Ok….I’ll spell it out. After this disaster of a season, I’m not buying Lavin’s PR campaign to have his contract extended. You seem to be buying it. Sold to you.

Oh, and I know you’ll especially enjoy the 2015 season, when the “youngest team in America” puts “hammer to rock” as it embarks upon its “life lessons.”

How do I seem to be buying it, as you say?

Nowhere you can find such. Thank you for building another strawman. I can spread it around some shrubbery.

You're starting to remind me of someone with your constant straw man and moving of backboards.

I'm not moving any backboard.

Do you think his contract should be extended? Yes or no?

To piss you off.... Yes.
 
Fine. As for Lavin's contract extension? Sold to you.

Sold to me? Kinda vague.
See
Nevertheless, I debunked your argument and now you're moving the backboard. Good job.

“Sold to you” is vague? Ok….I’ll spell it out. After this disaster of a season, I’m not buying Lavin’s PR campaign to have his contract extended. You seem to be buying it. Sold to you.

Oh, and I know you’ll especially enjoy the 2015 season, when the “youngest team in America” puts “hammer to rock” as it embarks upon its “life lessons.”

How do I seem to be buying it, as you say?

Nowhere you can find such. Thank you for building another strawman. I can spread it around some shrubbery.

You're starting to remind me of someone with your constant straw man and moving of backboards.

I'm not moving any backboard.

Do you think his contract should be extended? Yes or no?

To piss you off.... Yes.

Nice way to deflect the question.
 
Fine. As for Lavin's contract extension? Sold to you.

Sold to me? Kinda vague.
See
Nevertheless, I debunked your argument and now you're moving the backboard. Good job.

“Sold to you” is vague? Ok….I’ll spell it out. After this disaster of a season, I’m not buying Lavin’s PR campaign to have his contract extended. You seem to be buying it. Sold to you.

Oh, and I know you’ll especially enjoy the 2015 season, when the “youngest team in America” puts “hammer to rock” as it embarks upon its “life lessons.”

How do I seem to be buying it, as you say?

Nowhere you can find such. Thank you for building another strawman. I can spread it around some shrubbery.

You're starting to remind me of someone with your constant straw man and moving of backboards.

I'm not moving any backboard.

Do you think his contract should be extended? Yes or no?

To piss you off.... Yes.

Nice way to deflect the question.

No offense.... More like, I don't care discussing it with you. Not to mention, I stated my opinion on this a couple days ago.
 
Fine. As for Lavin's contract extension? Sold to you.

Sold to me? Kinda vague.
See
Nevertheless, I debunked your argument and now you're moving the backboard. Good job.

“Sold to you” is vague? Ok….I’ll spell it out. After this disaster of a season, I’m not buying Lavin’s PR campaign to have his contract extended. You seem to be buying it. Sold to you.

Oh, and I know you’ll especially enjoy the 2015 season, when the “youngest team in America” puts “hammer to rock” as it embarks upon its “life lessons.”

How do I seem to be buying it, as you say?

Nowhere you can find such. Thank you for building another strawman. I can spread it around some shrubbery.

You're starting to remind me of someone with your constant straw man and moving of backboards.

I'm not moving any backboard.

Do you think his contract should be extended? Yes or no?

To piss you off.... Yes.

Nice way to deflect the question.

No offense.... More like, I don't care discussing it with you. Not to mention, I stated my opinion on this a couple days ago.

I understand. It can be upsetting to discuss Lavin's record with someone who likes to stick to the facts.
 
Fine. As for Lavin's contract extension? Sold to you.

Sold to me? Kinda vague.
See
Nevertheless, I debunked your argument and now you're moving the backboard. Good job.

“Sold to you” is vague? Ok….I’ll spell it out. After this disaster of a season, I’m not buying Lavin’s PR campaign to have his contract extended. You seem to be buying it. Sold to you.

Oh, and I know you’ll especially enjoy the 2015 season, when the “youngest team in America” puts “hammer to rock” as it embarks upon its “life lessons.”

How do I seem to be buying it, as you say?

Nowhere you can find such. Thank you for building another strawman. I can spread it around some shrubbery.

You're starting to remind me of someone with your constant straw man and moving of backboards.

I'm not moving any backboard.

Do you think his contract should be extended? Yes or no?

To piss you off.... Yes.

Nice way to deflect the question.

No offense.... More like, I don't care discussing it with you. Not to mention, I stated my opinion on this a couple days ago.

I understand. It can be upsetting to discuss Lavin's record with someone who likes to stick to the facts.

LOL

Go enjoy the remainder of your evening, miserable one.
 
Fine. As for Lavin's contract extension? Sold to you.

Sold to me? Kinda vague.
See
Nevertheless, I debunked your argument and now you're moving the backboard. Good job.

“Sold to you” is vague? Ok….I’ll spell it out. After this disaster of a season, I’m not buying Lavin’s PR campaign to have his contract extended. You seem to be buying it. Sold to you.

Oh, and I know you’ll especially enjoy the 2015 season, when the “youngest team in America” puts “hammer to rock” as it embarks upon its “life lessons.”

How do I seem to be buying it, as you say?

Nowhere you can find such. Thank you for building another strawman. I can spread it around some shrubbery.

You're starting to remind me of someone with your constant straw man and moving of backboards.

I'm not moving any backboard.

Do you think his contract should be extended? Yes or no?

To piss you off.... Yes.

Nice way to deflect the question.

No offense.... More like, I don't care discussing it with you. Not to mention, I stated my opinion on this a couple days ago.

I understand. It can be upsetting to discuss Lavin's record with someone who likes to stick to the facts.

LOL

Go enjoy the remainder of your evening, miserable one.

You too, Stevie.
 
We are all pissed, but he deserves an extenstion. Two 20-win seasons...cancer...replacing his 1st assistant....losing a top 15 pick unexpectedly after a year....no senior yet...huge turnover he had to replace year 2.

Give him a two year extension and layout the expectations.

I wonder if we'd all feel better if at the end of the NIT loss he tossed chairs onto the court and choked a few players?

Probably :)

I wouldn't feel better. But I wonder how the Lavin haters would react to that? ;)



I don't hate Lavin but know he is a poor coach. Afterall, how many years does it take to develop an offense and a defense. After UCLA didn't he learn anything during his analyst tenure?

Lavin has no business being a basketball analyst

He was considered one of the "better" analysts too. That sure tells us all something!

It's two different skill sets, and he has proven it over 7 years. We on this board declare people losers and castigate them over and over. I hope you are as successful in your career as Lavin has been in broadcasting. In coaching not so much.

The real question is: why was he an analyst for 7 years? If he was a real D1 coach, someone would have picked him off much sooner. Even Bruce Pearl was hired after only 3 years and that was after a major scandal.

Dick Vermeil was an analyst for 15 years before he decided to coach again. Besides, Lavin could've had the NC State job prior to Sidney Lowe accepting it in 2006.

Some of y'all continue to not disappoint.

Dick Vermeil was like 60 years old when he returned to coaching. Lavin was in the prime of his working career, you can't compare the two. As for NC state, who knows what really went on behind the scenes?

PS: Who else did Lavin "turn down" from 2006 to coming here?

You're right...who knows..so don't assume he wasn't seriously considered for other coaching positions based on fact that you don't like him or based on the job he has done at SJU...he had a body of work that, while not perfect, had some impressive credits on it and justified him getting a look from folks.

If you want him out as coach of SJU, that's your prerogative and you're entitled to it...but if you're going to denigrate everything he has ever done just to make your point, that's just weak...ESPN thought enough to hire him and keep him...so he had some value to them
 
I believe P. Simmons is Joe3, folks. Lots of similarities.

Dink by TKO in round 1

I have no idea who Joe 3 is. But if he has great hair, I'll take that as a compliment.

Does liny89, Ben, or Resurrection of Joe ring any bells??

I don't think so...Joe3's posts, while a bit wordy, were well written..He veered off course a lot but was generally a supporter
 
I believe P. Simmons is Joe3, folks. Lots of similarities.

Dink by TKO in round 1

I have no idea who Joe 3 is. But if he has great hair, I'll take that as a compliment.

Does liny89, Ben, or Resurrection of Joe ring any bells??

I don't think so...Joe3's posts, while a bit wordy, were well written..He veered off course a lot but was generally a supporter

Supporter of what? St John’s basketball or Lavin? I am supporter of the former—which is precisely why I am no longer a supporter of the latter.

Good night.
 
I believe P. Simmons is Joe3, folks. Lots of similarities.

Dink by TKO in round 1

I have no idea who Joe 3 is. But if he has great hair, I'll take that as a compliment.

Does liny89, Ben, or Resurrection of Joe ring any bells??

I don't think so...Joe3's posts, while a bit wordy, were well written..He veered off course a lot but was generally a supporter

Supporter of what? St John’s basketball or Lavin? I am supporter of the former—which is precisely why I am no longer a supporter of the latter.

Good night.

Yes, good night
 
Hmmm I'll have to pay attention to posts more but his posts didn't really stand out as Joes material but admittedly I wasn't really looking too closely. The only thing that really stood out to me with Simmons was him wanting Lavin to wear a tie and that thing kind of made me think he was an older poster
 
Hmmm I'll have to pay attention to posts more but his posts didn't really stand out as Joes material but admittedly I wasn't really looking too closely. The only thing that really stood out to me with Simmons was him wanting Lavin to wear a tie and that thing kind of made me think he was an older poster

I think Mike Boutxpchaski is DieHard Johnny remember him from last year??
 
Hmmm I'll have to pay attention to posts more but his posts didn't really stand out as Joes material but admittedly I wasn't really looking too closely. The only thing that really stood out to me with Simmons was him wanting Lavin to wear a tie and that thing kind of made me think he was an older poster

Older here on Redmen is over 60!
 
I believe P. Simmons is Joe3, folks. Lots of similarities.

I believe DINK is a moron.. It's his favorite word. He can even spell it.. And, has used it exclusively on this site more than every other person. The next most poster has used moron zero times.

I think P. Simmons IS REALLY P. Simmons..I'M backing P. SIMMONS IN THIS ONE..
 
Back
Top