Repole on the radio

[quote="Las Vegan" post=343540]Thank you, Mike, long, long, overdue. This school has been grossly mismanaged ever since Harrington and his joy boys were running the place.[/quote]
Boy toy is more like it. Guy should be in jail for what he was doing. Instead he got a cushy retirement.
 
Another take away from the interview. You get the feeling that shortly after Cragg arrived, he realized the insanity of no one having a relationship with Repole.

I mean, the guy has been a major donor for many years. How is it that he "kind of met Bobby and Joe once"???
 
Last edited:
[quote="JohnnyFan" post=343681]Another take away from the interview. You get the feeling that shortly after Cragg arrived, he realized the insanity of no one having a relationship with Repole.

I mean, the guy has been a major donor for many years. How is it that he "kind of met Bobby and Joe once"???[/quote]

Repole is smart and wants to be involved. He asks questions and expects answers. He believes in accountability. All successful businesspeople do. He poses a threat to them. They’d rather have donors who throw money at them without them having to explain themselves. They want nothing to do with Repole, he scares them.
 
[quote="Monte" post=343706][quote="JohnnyFan" post=343681]Another take away from the interview. You get the feeling that shortly after Cragg arrived, he realized the insanity of no one having a relationship with Repole.

I mean, the guy has been a major donor for many years. How is it that he "kind of met Bobby and Joe once"???[/quote]

Repole is smart and wants to be involved. He asks questions and expects answers. He believes in accountability. All successful businesspeople do. He poses a threat to them. They’d rather have donors who throw money at them without them having to explain themselves. They want nothing to do with Repole, he scares them.[/quote]

Not sure if I've ever mentioned it on the board, but I do a lot of work for the Stanford Office of Development. Obviously there is a difference in budget, but the amount of material that goes out to maintain relationships that have been carefully cultivated over the course of years, even decades, is staggering. But the one prominent billionaire who wants to help the basketball program can't get the time of day here. It's scary.

John Arrillaga has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to Stanford. And I know this is a wacky concept, but the president of school takes his calls! And clears his schedule to meet with him! And you know what the result is? More donations! During the construction of the new football stadium, Arrillaga was out there in a freaking hardhat every damn day overseeing the project. Those sorts of benefits happen when you actually try.

But here, leadership would rather spend time castrating the best AD we've had in a long time, instead of cultivating a relationship with Repole. Great job, guys.
 
[quote="Sju grad 13" post=343722]Brutal piece by Jerry Carino. Says the Big East should step in.

[/quote]

Yes, brutal and accurate, piece.

Quote from the author: "The Big East should step in here. St. John’s is violently ill, and it’s stinking up the conference."
 
Last edited:
Was Repole involved in helping school pay for Bobby Hurley?

Is Repole willing to support Cragg with money to take care of the financial hurdles to get Cluess?

He mentioned specific financial arrangements to renovate locker rooms but didn’t seem close to any of the April disastrous coaching moves and failings that are happening

I wish he was able to help Cragg - who he respects - land Cluess
 
Following the coaching search started out intriguing and was a must read. It’s now downright depressing.

Repole’s revelations and outbursts may have been good radio but if they d9nt change anything will just drive us further into the abyss.

Guess it will come down to where the BoT falls wrt Cragg and Oliva. If they aren’t willing to tell Oliva to stand down, we are sunk.

The only potential silver lining is it is scaring off a lot of mediocre candidates and hopefully the only one who won’t be scared will be selected by default - Rick Pitino.
 
Last edited:
Can someone clarify a few things Repole said?
1. He mentioned that Mullin wasn't given the resources to win? Which resources? new locker rooms?
2. He also said "they" chased Slice away? Admin did? I thought that was between Mullin and Slice.
 
Clearly Repole went too far. It was way too emotional and it hurt his credibility. And to what end? Now none of the mid major guys with options even want to interview. He may have destroyed the program. He came off like a Mike Show caller. I’m not saying he’s lying and certainly a lot of what he said is true, but these two items you note don’t seem credible.
 
[quote="BasketballJones" post=343863]Clearly Repole went too far. It was way too emotional and it hurt his credibility. And to what end? Now none of the mid major guys with options even want to interview. He may have destroyed the program. He came off like a Mike Show caller. I’m not saying he’s lying and certainly a lot of what he said is true, but these two items you note don’t seem credible.[/quote]

He went too far? Maybe in your eyes but it needed to be done.
The only area where I would agree would be taking shots at Bill Collins head of BOT. You need to BOT as they are the only ones with power to take down Bobby and in turn Oliva as well. By calling him out you alienate them as well.

Nothing he said was false. I know some disputed points but he spoke nothing but the truth.

Yes he's brash and its why Harrington never did and Bobby doesn't like him. But he didn't speak that way it would have been scanned over and not put under the spotlight like it is now. Rebuilding a house that was demolished is a lot better than one still standing.
 
[quote="BasketballJones" post=343863]Clearly Repole went too far. It was way too emotional and it hurt his credibility. And to what end? Now none of the mid major guys with options even want to interview. He may have destroyed the program. He came off like a Mike Show caller. I’m not saying he’s lying and certainly a lot of what he said is true, but these two items you note don’t seem credible.[/quote]

Saw where this was going and said his peace.
 
I’m really surprised Cragg will put up with this. If what Mike sAid is true, Cragg name is getting dragged thru the mud not due to his own fault.
 
Especially since he sees we pay people who walk away their whole contract. Why deal with the mess.
 
Last edited:
[quote="Monte" post=343521][quote="JohnnyFan" post=343519][quote="Beast of the East" post=343482][quote="MCNPA" post=343475][quote="Beast of the East" post=343471][quote="P Simmons" post=343457][quote="Monte" post=343453][quote="mkras99" post=343440]Downside - what coach in their right mind will want to join this shitshow now?[/quote]

Exactly the kind of coach we need here. Someone who sees the potential to make us great again(MSJUGA!) and has balls and the work ethic to get the job done. Not for the faint of heart.[/quote]

The problem is, you've got the school's largest donor stating publicly that the school's president and right hand man don't support the basketball program the way they should, will not let the school's athletic director do his job properly, and are generally creating a toxic environment for all.

Unless I'm desperate for a new coaching gig, I'm staying far away from that scene.[/quote]

He's not even close to being the school's top donor. Not to belittle even a $25 donor, but it's not repole.[/quote]

Pretty sure we saw some of the reasons why. Repole has the money do be so for sure.[/quote]

Not to throw water on this, but I'd gotten inferences that Repole really doesn't know how to buy influence at a University. YOu don't make a million dollar donation and say if I give you this, will you let my kid in. You make your donations, and then when it comes time, you get preferential treatment that can get a kid who might get passed over in.

It's the same with influence. You make your big donations, and then you get put on committees, boards of lesser note, and then moved up to Board of Governors, and then Board of Trustees. You don't make a donation with the stipulation that you want to direct an activity, like who they choose as coach. A few years ago a staffer inferred that Repole never made a big donation to the school, because he put strings on his donation, and that's just not the way it works.

So now by this interview, while he may know stuff about what's going on, it's clear he is a disgruntled outsider that likely for now at least burned a bridge ever to be one of those people that influence decisions at SJU.

Clearly if Repole was on the inside of this s- show, he would be influence and not sharing his frustration on talk radio. He can't just say even privately, I'll give you $5 million if you hire so and so. Even then the stakes have changed. $5 million would even come close to the $20-30 million it would cost on a 6 year guaranteed to secure a top name coach.

I identify with his frustration and like many of you, am happy he said it, but I don't think this helped him one bit to influence the decision on the next coach.[/quote]

Sorry, Beast. When you have a billionaire donor with high interest in one of your programs, you find a way to cultivate a relationship and make it work. That's how the game is played. I am sure all the power programs have big time donors with even bigger egos. You make it work and use the $upport to grow your program.

That's the deal and if Joe and Bobby don't like it, they need to get out of the way.[/quote]

Clearly then all the other big donors just willingly and blindly hand their hard earned money over to the incompetent decision makers, and sit back and watch the mismanagement of their contributions. Repole sounds smarter than all of them for wanting to be involved in how his money is utilized.[/quote]

The biggest donors nearly all get a seat at the table, if you know what I mean. They all have had tremendous career success in their own field of expertise - many in finance, banking, real estate, on wall street, entrepreneurial stuff. All universities operate this way - make a huge donation, you get some influence if you want.

The problem at St. John's is infrastructure. As the Vincentians diminished in size, Harrington turned more to his secular board of trustees for direction. They made him feel like he was one of them. They told him he was more of a CEO than a priest. He believed it. Of course, all the improprieties followed - taking cash payments from Cecilia Chang and lavish gifts too, soliciting "loans" from wealthy board members for a for profit construction venture, and on and on. Along the way the secular board grew in power and authority.

The board was handed the plum responsibility of finding a successor to Jarvis. I won't repeat the story but it blew up when Harrington overrode that decision to pick Roberts on his own. Again, no strong AD, a bad decision, and the decline continued.

Thini about the state of the part of the org chart in terms of athletic leadership: We have a university president, who had never done this job before being hired here, with a person who has amassed and been bestowed an incredible amount of power as general counsel (a job in itself), chief administrative officer (a job in itself), who somehow still had time to appoint himself interim athletic director. They hired an AD from Duke who has never done this before, and to boot apparently haven't given him authority to run the process without the intrusion, oversight, and direct participation of the board of trustees. A crazy shit show.

Even with all these hands in the pie, and high level ultra successful board members participating, no one thought that unless you went in to blow Hurley away in terms of dollars, he wasn't likely to come here. Instead they made an offer that ASU all too easily could match and exceed and give Hurley pause for thought. Repole was right and wrong - he was clearly thinking off the top of his head when he said they should have offered $3 million, then adjusted it to 3.5 then 4 million. What he DIDN'T say was that he offered to fund it - not even close to that - so all the rumors about him stepping up to hire the coach are totally false.

In process he found a willing host to let him vent - Francessa, who has done almost zip for the university, and as JSJ has pointed out many times, reneged on his promise to fund a scholarship in his late mother's name. HE offered it publicly at the President's dinner to get applause, but didn't follow up and ignored requests to discuss it.

Apparently he is right about one thing for certain - that this decision should be led by Cragg. Cragg should have a budget for the hire, and be able to go about it with a committee of his choosing. Not Bobby G., Not Joe Oliva, not the board of trustees. None of them are qualified to make a decision like this. One of them, though an attorney isn't even qualified to negotiate a contract, if history is any indicator.

Bobby G. is basically hired by the BOT. As such as a weak CEO, he is at their service. So the things they want a voice in, he doesn't contain them - like hiring a coach. They should be advisory, at the discretion of the President. Instead it appears to be the opposite.

It's absurd that Joe Oliva has been given so much authority.

It's absurd the board even be involved in this or other athletic department tasks.

It's absurd that Bobby G. micromanages basketball because he "likes" basketball. LEt him stick to reffing CYO games.

Everyone wants to be a GM and above all things at SJU, be part of running and building a great basketball team. Francessa looked like a fool for calling Cragg a "nice kid" when Cragg is 55 or so. Repole referred to Xavier University, mispronouncing it as "EXavier" not as "Zavier".

You guys think its amazingly good that he blew the whistle and blew this up. Perhaps the first direct result is Cluess withdrawing his name. It can't possibly help them find a competent big name coach to come here - even a sullied Rick Pitino would want no part of this very likely. Repole will never again gain access to be part of decisions, which had he played his cards right was well within his grasp. All he had to do basically was tell the school he's all in for Hurley at $15 or $20 million of his own money, and Hurley could have been secured.

I don;t give him credit for maligning the process and the school in the worst possible way. The fallout won't be to improve this process, but to make it much much harder to get a competent guy installed as coach. I'm not shooting the messenger. Some of you are clapping like seals because Repole exposed what has been intimated during this process - that something is seriously wrong. But he used a forum that is damaging to the school and process even as bad as it has been. Maybe things have to get worse before they get better. But you can't clear house with all the guilty parties, because then no one will be left standing.

This flat out sucks.
 
Last edited:
[quote="Beast of the East" post=343927]
You guys think its amazingly good that he blew the whistle and blew this up. Perhaps the first direct result is Cluess withdrawing his name. It can't possibly help them find a competent big name coach to come here - even a sullied Rick Pitino would want no part of this very likely. Repole will never again gain access to be part of decisions, which had he played his cards right was well within his grasp. All he had to do basically was tell the school he's all in for Hurley at $15 or $20 million of his own money, and Hurley could have been secured.

I don;t give him credit for maligning the process and the school in the worst possible way. The fallout won't be to improve this process, but to make it much much harder to get a competent guy installed as coach. I'm not shooting the messenger. Some of you are clapping like seals because Repole exposed what has been intimated during this process - that something is seriously wrong. But he used a forum that is damaging to the school and process even as bad as it has been. Maybe things have to get worse before they get better. But you can't clear house with all the guilty parties, because then no one will be left standing.

This flat out sucks.[/quote]

You can't fix a problem until you acknowledge there is one first. Repole shined a spotlight on our problem. Either it will be addressed by smart people who care or it will be ignored by tribalists who don't give a shit or are too stupid to realize they are the problem not the solution.

There's an easy fix to this. You don't even have to fire anyone. Just give Cragg an ironclad agreement that he runs the show. He should have a budget and the ability to act without intervention unless he asks for additional funds.
 
[quote="Beast of the East" post=343927][quote="Monte" post=343521][quote="JohnnyFan" post=343519][quote="Beast of the East" post=343482][quote="MCNPA" post=343475][quote="Beast of the East" post=343471][quote="P Simmons" post=343457][quote="Monte" post=343453][quote="mkras99" post=343440]Downside - what coach in their right mind will want to join this shitshow now?[/quote]

Exactly the kind of coach we need here. Someone who sees the potential to make us great again(MSJUGA!) and has balls and the work ethic to get the job done. Not for the faint of heart.[/quote]

The problem is, you've got the school's largest donor stating publicly that the school's president and right hand man don't support the basketball program the way they should, will not let the school's athletic director do his job properly, and are generally creating a toxic environment for all.

Unless I'm desperate for a new coaching gig, I'm staying far away from that scene.[/quote]

He's not even close to being the school's top donor. Not to belittle even a $25 donor, but it's not repole.[/quote]

Pretty sure we saw some of the reasons why. Repole has the money do be so for sure.[/quote]

Not to throw water on this, but I'd gotten inferences that Repole really doesn't know how to buy influence at a University. YOu don't make a million dollar donation and say if I give you this, will you let my kid in. You make your donations, and then when it comes time, you get preferential treatment that can get a kid who might get passed over in.

It's the same with influence. You make your big donations, and then you get put on committees, boards of lesser note, and then moved up to Board of Governors, and then Board of Trustees. You don't make a donation with the stipulation that you want to direct an activity, like who they choose as coach. A few years ago a staffer inferred that Repole never made a big donation to the school, because he put strings on his donation, and that's just not the way it works.

So now by this interview, while he may know stuff about what's going on, it's clear he is a disgruntled outsider that likely for now at least burned a bridge ever to be one of those people that influence decisions at SJU.

Clearly if Repole was on the inside of this s- show, he would be influence and not sharing his frustration on talk radio. He can't just say even privately, I'll give you $5 million if you hire so and so. Even then the stakes have changed. $5 million would even come close to the $20-30 million it would cost on a 6 year guaranteed to secure a top name coach.

I identify with his frustration and like many of you, am happy he said it, but I don't think this helped him one bit to influence the decision on the next coach.[/quote]

Sorry, Beast. When you have a billionaire donor with high interest in one of your programs, you find a way to cultivate a relationship and make it work. That's how the game is played. I am sure all the power programs have big time donors with even bigger egos. You make it work and use the $upport to grow your program.

That's the deal and if Joe and Bobby don't like it, they need to get out of the way.[/quote]

Clearly then all the other big donors just willingly and blindly hand their hard earned money over to the incompetent decision makers, and sit back and watch the mismanagement of their contributions. Repole sounds smarter than all of them for wanting to be involved in how his money is utilized.[/quote]

The biggest donors nearly all get a seat at the table, if you know what I mean. They all have had tremendous career success in their own field of expertise - many in finance, banking, real estate, on wall street, entrepreneurial stuff. All universities operate this way - make a huge donation, you get some influence if you want.

The problem at St. John's is infrastructure. As the Vincentians diminished in size, Harrington turned more to his secular board of trustees for direction. They made him feel like he was one of them. They told him he was more of a CEO than a priest. He believed it. Of course, all the improprieties followed - taking cash payments from Cecilia Chang and lavish gifts too, soliciting "loans" from wealthy board members for a for profit construction venture, and on and on. Along the way the secular board grew in power and authority.

The board was handed the plum responsibility of finding a successor to Jarvis. I won't repeat the story but it blew up when Harrington overrode that decision to pick Roberts on his own. Again, no strong AD, a bad decision, and the decline continued.

Thini about the state of the part of the org chart in terms of athletic leadership: We have a university president, who had never done this job before being hired here, with a person who has amassed and been bestowed an incredible amount of power as general counsel (a job in itself), chief administrative officer (a job in itself), who somehow still had time to appoint himself interim athletic director. They hired an AD from Duke who has never done this before, and to boot apparently haven't given him authority to run the process without the intrusion, oversight, and direct participation of the board of trustees. A crazy shit show.

Even with all these hands in the pie, and high level ultra successful board members participating, no one thought that unless you went in to blow Hurley away in terms of dollars, he wasn't likely to come here. Instead they made an offer that ASU all too easily could match and exceed and give Hurley pause for thought. Repole was right and wrong - he was clearly thinking off the top of his head when he said they should have offered $3 million, then adjusted it to 3.5 then 4 million. What he DIDN'T say was that he offered to fund it - not even close to that - so all the rumors about him stepping up to hire the coach are totally false.

In process he found a willing host to let him vent - Francessa, who has done almost zip for the university, and as JSJ has pointed out many times, reneged on his promise to fund a scholarship in his late mother's name. HE offered it publicly at the President's dinner to get applause, but didn't follow up and ignored requests to discuss it.

Apparently he is right about one thing for certain - that this decision should be led by Cragg. Cragg should have a budget for the hire, and be able to go about it with a committee of his choosing. Not Bobby G., Not Joe Oliva, not the board of trustees. None of them are qualified to make a decision like this. One of them, though an attorney isn't even qualified to negotiate a contract, if history is any indicator.

Bobby G. is basically hired by the BOT. As such as a weak CEO, he is at their service. So the things they want a voice in, he doesn't contain them - like hiring a coach. They should be advisory, at the discretion of the President. Instead it appears to be the opposite.

It's absurd that Joe Oliva has been given so much authority.

It's absurd the board even be involved in this or other athletic department tasks.

It's absurd that Bobby G. micromanages basketball because he "likes" basketball. LEt him stick to reffing CYO games.

Everyone wants to be a GM and above all things at SJU, be part of running and building a great basketball team. Francessa looked like a fool for calling Cragg a "nice kid" when Cragg is 55 or so. Repole referred to Xavier University, mispronouncing it as "EXavier" not as "Zavier".

You guys think its amazingly good that he blew the whistle and blew this up. Perhaps the first direct result is Cluess withdrawing his name. It can't possibly help them find a competent big name coach to come here - even a sullied Rick Pitino would want no part of this very likely. Repole will never again gain access to be part of decisions, which had he played his cards right was well within his grasp. All he had to do basically was tell the school he's all in for Hurley at $15 or $20 million of his own money, and Hurley could have been secured.

I don;t give him credit for maligning the process and the school in the worst possible way. The fallout won't be to improve this process, but to make it much much harder to get a competent guy installed as coach. I'm not shooting the messenger. Some of you are clapping like seals because Repole exposed what has been intimated during this process - that something is seriously wrong. But he used a forum that is damaging to the school and process even as bad as it has been. Maybe things have to get worse before they get better. But you can't clear house with all the guilty parties, because then no one will be left standing.

This flat out sucks.[/quote]

Beast, we have hit rock bottom. It was absolutely time to completely blow it up. You seem to have a little more patience than the rest of us. I respect that, but you're in the minority. This fan base can take no more. We are not concerned about the fall out from yesterday's interview. The house cannot be fixed, it's a knock down and rebuild.
 
[quote="BasketballJones" post=343863]Clearly Repole went too far. It was way too emotional and it hurt his credibility. And to what end? Now none of the mid major guys with options even want to interview. He may have destroyed the program. He came off like a Mike Show caller. I’m not saying he’s lying and certainly a lot of what he said is true, but these two items you note don’t seem credible.[/quote]

Sad. Is Oliva a friend? Must be or someone close to him/on the board. Repole didnt go too far clown. The President, BOT and Oliva have gone too far for far too long. Good for him for exposing this damn circus on a big platform. It's not a tiny issue it's a huge, incompetent issue.
 
Back
Top