(POST-GAME) @Butler, Sat. Jan. 19, 4:30pm, FOX / 570AM

[quote="Beast of the East" post=316579][quote="gonzalo" post=316577][quote="Beast of the East" post=316572]

Wennington not a prized recruit.

[/quote]

Bill Wennington was a McDonald´s All-American.[/quote]

I believe Shelton Jones was also. But there was no clamor that we had just snagged a superb player. They both were very solid and both played in the NBA (Wennington 14 seasons of mostly towel waving). But they were far from the category of recruit that could have gone anywhere.[/quote]

Agree with most of your earlier post, but to say that Wennington and Jones where not highly sought after recruits is incorrect. Jones was a tremendous high school player and NY State POY if I remember correctly. Niether turned out to be college superstars, but that doesn’t change the fact that both where highly sought after coming out of high school. Both top 25 I would say.
 
[quote="Beast of the East" post=316579][quote="gonzalo" post=316577][quote="Beast of the East" post=316572]

Wennington not a prized recruit.

[/quote]

Bill Wennington was a McDonald´s All-American.[/quote]

I believe Shelton Jones was also. But there was no clamor that we had just snagged a superb player. They both were very solid and both played in the NBA (Wennington 14 seasons of mostly towel waving). But they were far from the category of recruit that could have gone anywhere.[/quote]
Towel waving was no small feat given the additional weight of his personal hardware weighing him down.
 
[quote="Beast of the East" post=316572]

We've ALWAYS relied heavily on transfers

[/quote]

Lou´s teams had 2-3 transfers/Jucos per season.
We have 8 transfers/Jucos this season. The 3 new players for next season are a transfer and 2 jucos.
It is not the same recruting strategy.
 
[quote="Monte" post=316583][quote="Beast of the East" post=316579][quote="gonzalo" post=316577][quote="Beast of the East" post=316572]

Wennington not a prized recruit.

[/quote]

Bill Wennington was a McDonald´s All-American.[/quote]

I believe Shelton Jones was also. But there was no clamor that we had just snagged a superb player. They both were very solid and both played in the NBA (Wennington 14 seasons of mostly towel waving). But they were far from the category of recruit that could have gone anywhere.[/quote]

Agree with most of your earlier post, but to say that Wennington and Jones where not highly sought after recruits is incorrect. Jones was a tremendous high school player and NY State POY if I remember correctly. Niether turned out to be college superstars, but that doesn’t change the fact that both where highly sought after coming out of high school. Both top 25 I would say.[/quote]

Do you really think top 25? I don't remember that at all, and both are really good guys. Wennington spent a lot of Fridays drinking in the Rat when it was allowed and hanging with other students. Shelton Jones who is another good guy, will remind you today (he has) that he played in the NBA and won the NBA dunk contest one year. But neither were hearlded as program changers the way the others I mentioned were
 
I think most people who know of the site and don't post avoid it for the opposite reason. Not the negativity, but the people who constantly attack others for questioning coaches, pointing out the obvious in underachieving, etc. It can't always be rah-rah when you are watching a sinking ship. You can simultaneously hope for the best while also making it clear the experiment is not working for the 4th straight year.

The Big East is a good conference, but Butler and DePaul aren't Syracuse and NC State. My point is that it's far from impossible to pile up wins this year in conference...Marquette and rebuilding Villanova have had no issue. And this is in a year where we at worst match the talent and at best surpass theirs. We are not 3-4 because the Big East is a monster this year, we are 3-4 because we are not a good team. The individual talent is there but the coaching is absolutely not. You can just see it on the players' faces...they seem lost and there doesn't seem to be a real plan. We have begged for bigs for years to no avail. We begged for a real assistant for years to no avail. Bigs were out there and we didn't go all out for them. Real assistants were there and we didn't go all out for them. Fans knew what was wrong and the corrections were available and still none were made. I think that's why fans are so frustrated. When we went from Lavin to Mullin we were expecting an upgrade, but we actually downgraded significantly. Many of us said pre-season that if we can't get it done this year, something seriously wrong. Well, something's seriously wrong. I'll hope for a miracle run like every year that never materializes, but remember this team can't even stay .500 for long let alone going well above it.
 
Yes,he demands respect.At the end of the yr if he decides to retire we should wish him luck.But this season is not over yet and the team has been very competitive and we had let downs in a few games that if not we would have had 2 more BE victories and one against S H which if not for a terrible call would have been another win. A few yrs ago we played games in conference with no hope of winning,now we go into every game with a good chance of winning that is progress and next yr will be even better. It takes time to developer a great team,our time will come ,just try to enjoy the game things are not as bad as they seem.nAlso, I think CM is not a quitter many do not like to hear this but he may need a little more time Looking forward to our next game
 
[quote="Beast of the East" post=316591][quote="Monte" post=316583][quote="Beast of the East" post=316579][quote="gonzalo" post=316577][quote="Beast of the East" post=316572]

Wennington not a prized recruit.

[/quote]

Bill Wennington was a McDonald´s All-American.[/quote]

I believe Shelton Jones was also. But there was no clamor that we had just snagged a superb player. They both were very solid and both played in the NBA (Wennington 14 seasons of mostly towel waving). But they were far from the category of recruit that could have gone anywhere.[/quote]

Agree with most of your earlier post, but to say that Wennington and Jones where not highly sought after recruits is incorrect. Jones was a tremendous high school player and NY State POY if I remember correctly. Niether turned out to be college superstars, but that doesn’t change the fact that both where highly sought after coming out of high school. Both top 25 I would say.[/quote]

Do you really think top 25? I don't remember that at all, and both are really good guys. Wennington spent a lot of Fridays drinking in the Rat when it was allowed and hanging with other students. Shelton Jones who is another good guy, will remind you today (he has) that he played in the NBA and won the NBA dunk contest one year. But neither were hearlded as program changers the way the others I mentioned were[/quote]

How many true “program changers” are there? Besides, we didn’t need to have our program changed back then. We were a top 20 team year in and year out. After those early and mid 80s teams came the Sealy/Werdann/Sproling teams. Then the Felipe/Zendon teams. Then the Artest/Barckley/Glover teams. We had a 20 year run of incredible recruiting success of top 50 kids, many of whom were top 15 kids. We backfilled with transfers(IE Brust, Middleton, etc) and 2-3 star recruits(IE Singleton, Grant, etc).
 
Here are exact quotes from All Star Sports Recruiting Report re Wennington ,Mullin and Jones when they were seniors in H.S.
Winnington 7-0 (no 31) 19.5 ppt 13 rpg fine shooter, moves very well, rejects, rebounds, best is yet to come will start
Mullin (no 23) 26.7 ppt 14rpg termed a coach's player, plays very intelligently.outstanding long range southpaw marksman, rebounds, plays tough D. Can swing.will be great SJU player
Jones (no 18) 6 - 8 25 ppg 14rpg excellent prospect rebounds passes scores inside. Will challenge for starting job
 
[quote="Beast of the East" post=316572][quote="redmanwest" post=316571]With all due respect OSR, "good riddance"? Chris is the best player ever to wear the uniform. He took this job to try to bring us back to relevancy, and he has made the team and talent better each year he's been here. YES, there are flaws and lapses in the team, roster, coaching, but I think he is due more respect than "good riddance".

His coaching tenure may or may not turn out to be a success. The biggest reason I was hesitant for him to take the job was that it could spoil his legacy among our fickle alums. But, I appreciate the fact that he took on the job to try to return our program (the one HE was largely responsible for making a top program for a time) to competitiveness.

If he leaves, he still deserves the respect that he earned. I bet that if we don't make the tourney this year, he will "retire" knowing that it is time to let someone else try.

I just don't get the disdain and disrespect shown a man who though inexperienced and flawed as a coach is owed some modicum of respect for all he's meant to the program, and all the pleasure he gave to us old guys who saw him play.

Just my 2 cents.

[quote="oldschool Redmen" post=316563][quote="Windy City Johnny Fan" post=316553][quote="Class of 72"

Cragg has to demand staff change, if no ncaa then it's 4 years of nothing, they gotta do something.
Every year of this is crap.
If Chris walks then good riddance.[/quote][/quote]


I would say that about 75% of fans I encounter are aware of this site. Most don't post here, by far, and most don't pay much attention. The main reason? The constant negativity and stupidity. Two games ago, most of the big detractors were so anxious to proclaim BE coach of the year, BE season title, and to reassert their love for everything St. John's. Granted that don't most have season tix, don't come to games at CA (or MSG for that matter). With every single loss, they cannot contain themselves to point out deficiencies of the staff, depth, and talent of the team. Again. And again. And again. And again.

Honestly I don't give a shit about how warm CA gets when filled, I'll take it filled any day, and honestly, it is no where near as hot as people say. I dunno, maybe some guys are going through the hot flashes stage of their life.

It's tiresome to hear about the lack of seatbacks. Everyone would like seatbacks, yes. But if you think it makes sense to make that one of your top issues when you spoke to Cragg 1 x, yes he will treat you with respect, but it's pretty idiotic. It isn't a cost issue, it's a capacity issue. Seatbacks reduce # of available seats considerably, and if you put seatbacks in the lower bowl, a substantial number of fans will be bumped to the upper tiers. And if you put seatbacks everywhere, I don't know the exact number, but I bet you lose somewhere around 1000 seats. IF you are 70, I sympathize. If you are 30, hit the gym, or see a chiropractor. The loudest bitcher about this doesn't even have season tix, yet drones on and on about it. If we blow out CA to enlarge capacity, I'm pretty certain that most if not all areas will have seats. Then again, the big issue other than real estate to expand, is that Finneran went to Villanova and so did his dollars to help finance it.

I just don't get the vitriol against Mullin at all. I would say he is pretty comfortable for life, and could have stayed in the NBA and cashed a paycheck in a better climate locale. But instead he comes to this dump of a program, with a goal to restore it. If you haven't noticed, guys have NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER flooded here. We'd snare a top HS prospect, a Mullin, a George Johnson, a Ron Artest, Felipe Lopez, or Zendon, or Wayne McKoy, and then backfill with a horde of second tier guys and transfers. We never EVER had a recruiting machine. Don't talk about the 85 team, please. Mullin was 3x BE player of the year, Berry was Juco, Wennington not a prized recruit. Mark Jackson was a distant 3rd best point guard in the city, after Kenny Smith and Pearl, both of whom we didn't even get a sniff at.

Before then, it was Reggie Carter coming home, Berard Rencher coming home, Ed Searcy coming home, even Curtis Redding. A horde over time. So stop with this dumb transfer game horseshit. We've ALWAYS relied heavily on transfers, and almost always benfitted from NYC city kids who left and weren't happy elsewhere - maybe more than any team in the country because of our geographical location.

If you guys think that supporting this team means that you give your support only when we win, that's not support. Do you heap praise on your kids when they get an A in science, only to tell them how much they suck when they get a D in math? Well, maybe you do. I've heard good guys, a neighbor for one, screaming at his son simply because the kid wasn't so bright and his 4th grade report card blew.

You want to support the team, I mean really? Then shoot Cragg, or Chris, or Greg, or Matt an email or twitter message after a tough loss, or an injury or setback. They'd likely really appreciate it, even if they don't respond or "like" your comment. You know what? You'll feel better about it too. Maybe.

I'm guessing most of us cou;dn't write a $22 million check to renovate CA, or a $4 million check to hire a guy like Hurley (who is taking his share of idiocy from some UCONN "fans"). But even a $50, $100, or $500 donation (your tix aren't a donation) helps improve the program. That's the way we can be part of the solution, instead of propagating negativity that is by all means part of the problem.[/quote]

I don't know Beast, at the DePaul game I thought it was stifling, even the other photographers on the floor were asking if they had the heat turned on LOL. :lol:
 
[quote="Monte" post=316597][quote="Beast of the East" post=316591][quote="Monte" post=316583][quote="Beast of the East" post=316579][quote="gonzalo" post=316577][quote="Beast of the East" post=316572]

Wennington not a prized recruit.

[/quote]

Bill Wennington was a McDonald´s All-American.[/quote]

I believe Shelton Jones was also. But there was no clamor that we had just snagged a superb player. They both were very solid and both played in the NBA (Wennington 14 seasons of mostly towel waving). But they were far from the category of recruit that could have gone anywhere.[/quote]

Agree with most of your earlier post, but to say that Wennington and Jones where not highly sought after recruits is incorrect. Jones was a tremendous high school player and NY State POY if I remember correctly. Niether turned out to be college superstars, but that doesn’t change the fact that both where highly sought after coming out of high school. Both top 25 I would say.[/quote]

Do you really think top 25? I don't remember that at all, and both are really good guys. Wennington spent a lot of Fridays drinking in the Rat when it was allowed and hanging with other students. Shelton Jones who is another good guy, will remind you today (he has) that he played in the NBA and won the NBA dunk contest one year. But neither were hearlded as program changers the way the others I mentioned were[/quote]

How many true “program changers” are there? Besides, we didn’t need to have our program changed back then. We were a top 20 team year in and year out. After those early and mid 80s teams came the Sealy/Werdann/Sproling teams. Then the Felipe/Zendon teams. Then the Artest/Barckley/Glover teams. We had a 20 year run of incredible recruiting success of top 50 kids, many of whom were top 15 kids. We backfilled with transfers(IE Brust, Middleton, etc) and 2-3 star recruits(IE Singleton, Grant, etc).[/quote]

The Glory days! Sure would be nice if we could get back to that level.
 
[quote="Mike Zaun" post=316594]I think most people who know of the site and don't post avoid it for the opposite reason. Not the negativity, but the people who constantly attack others for questioning coaches, pointing out the obvious in underachieving, etc. It can't always be rah-rah when you are watching a sinking ship. You can simultaneously hope for the best while also making it clear the experiment is not working for the 4th straight year.

The Big East is a good conference, but Butler and DePaul aren't Syracuse and NC State. My point is that it's far from impossible to pile up wins this year in conference...Marquette and rebuilding Villanova have had no issue. And this is in a year where we at worst match the talent and at best surpass theirs. We are not 3-4 because the Big East is a monster this year, we are 3-4 because we are not a good team. The individual talent is there but the coaching is absolutely not. You can just see it on the players' faces...they seem lost and there doesn't seem to be a real plan. We have begged for bigs for years to no avail. We begged for a real assistant for years to no avail. Bigs were out there and we didn't go all out for them. Real assistants were there and we didn't go all out for them. Fans knew what was wrong and the corrections were available and still none were made. I think that's why fans are so frustrated. When we went from Lavin to Mullin we were expecting an upgrade, but we actually downgraded significantly. Many of us said pre-season that if we can't get it done this year, something seriously wrong. Well, something's seriously wrong. I'll hope for a miracle run like every year that never materializes, but remember this team can't even stay .500 for long let alone going well above it.[/quote]

Several points you made bear scrutiny. first is that Villanova is rebuilding. That is simply incorrect. they returned 2 excellent players that will get drafted. Booth has 2 championships under his belt, and Paschall one. When you are the best team in the country, you can lose several players and, while not a championship contender, can be top 25. That's where they are now.

As for your ability to read the faces of the players, which tells you they are lost, let's just say I'm not so sure you are that talented. You contend that the talent is here, and that the problem is the coaching, I disagree. If this was a 20 minute game, where no substitutions were allowed, then perhaps yes. If no one over 6'7 was allowed, no doubt we are the Big East's premier team. Having 5 guards and wings, and no bench, makes winning in a major conference very challenging. Put that on the staff for failed team construction, OK. To intimate that reason they are 3 and 4 is a lack of coaching is pure guesswork. Neither Wright nor McDermott, who made one of the dumbest coaching moves in history this season, could erase the lack of size and bench that Mullin has to deal with.
 
Last edited:
[quote="redmanwest" post=316571]With all due respect OSR, "good riddance"? Chris is the best player ever to wear the uniform. He took this job to try to bring us back to relevancy, and he has made the team and talent better each year he's been here. YES, there are flaws and lapses in the team, roster, coaching, but I think he is due more respect than "good riddance".

His coaching tenure may or may not turn out to be a success. The biggest reason I was hesitant for him to take the job was that it could spoil his legacy among our fickle alums. But, I appreciate the fact that he took on the job to try to return our program (the one HE was largely responsible for making a top program for a time) to competitiveness.

If he leaves, he still deserves the respect that he earned. I bet that if we don't make the tourney this year, he will "retire" knowing that it is time to let someone else try.

I just don't get the disdain and disrespect shown a man who though inexperienced and flawed as a coach is owed some modicum of respect for all he's meant to the program, and all the pleasure he gave to us old guys who saw him play.

Just my 2 cents.

[quote="oldschool Redmen" post=316563][quote="Windy City Johnny Fan" post=316553][quote="Class of 72"

Cragg has to demand staff change, if no ncaa then it's 4 years of nothing, they gotta do something.
Every year of this is crap.
If Chris walks then good riddance.[/quote][/quote]

"Chris is the best player ever to wear the uniform."
Yes he is, and I give him mad props for that, but I can seperate Chris the player, and Chris the coach.

"He took this job to try to bring us back to relevancy, and he has made the team and talent better each year he's been here."..... I thought Lavin already did that? 2 NCAA and 2 NIT appearances, you can make a case that he accomplished much more then Chris. Yeah I ran Lavin out at the end for being lazy recruiting, but I'll give him his due.

"If he leaves, he still deserves the respect that he earned. I bet that if we don't make the tourney this year, he will "retire" knowing that it is time to let someone else try."
I'll always respect Chris the player.

There's never staff change, and everyone can see we needed more polished assistants next to Chris, wtf does Mitch do in the offseason? We don't go all out to see recruits, Alot of the elite schools head coaches go see them, at SJU it's mostly Matt, and sometimes St. Jean.
 
[quote="Mike Zaun" post=316594]I think most people who know of the site and don't post avoid it for the opposite reason. Not the negativity, but the people who constantly attack others for questioning coaches, pointing out the obvious in underachieving, etc. It can't always be rah-rah when you are watching a sinking ship. You can simultaneously hope for the best while also making it clear the experiment is not working for the 4th straight year.

The Big East is a good conference, but Butler and DePaul aren't Syracuse and NC State. My point is that it's far from impossible to pile up wins this year in conference...Marquette and rebuilding Villanova have had no issue. And this is in a year where we at worst match the talent and at best surpass theirs. We are not 3-4 because the Big East is a monster this year, we are 3-4 because we are not a good team. The individual talent is there but the coaching is absolutely not. You can just see it on the players' faces...they seem lost and there doesn't seem to be a real plan. We have begged for bigs for years to no avail. We begged for a real assistant for years to no avail. Bigs were out there and we didn't go all out for them. Real assistants were there and we didn't go all out for them. Fans knew what was wrong and the corrections were available and still none were made. I think that's why fans are so frustrated. When we went from Lavin to Mullin we were expecting an upgrade, but we actually downgraded significantly. Many of us said pre-season that if we can't get it done this year, something seriously wrong. Well, something's seriously wrong. I'll hope for a miracle run like every year that never materializes, but remember this team can't even stay .500 for long let alone going well above it.[/quote]

After 3 accounts here and 1 demotion, you still don't get it. At the drop of the hat you repeat the same stupid crap that a few people here have fabricated. We are 15-4, and not sure but have we even lost a game by double digits? 3-4 after 4 road games projects to something around the .500 mark. You act like we are 1-6. Nonsense, really. I hope there are no pledges in your bv apt and that it's in the basement.
 
[quote="Beast of the East" post=316616][quote="Mike Zaun" post=316594]I think most people who know of the site and don't post avoid it for the opposite reason. Not the negativity, but the people who constantly attack others for questioning coaches, pointing out the obvious in underachieving, etc. It can't always be rah-rah when you are watching a sinking ship. You can simultaneously hope for the best while also making it clear the experiment is not working for the 4th straight year.

The Big East is a good conference, but Butler and DePaul aren't Syracuse and NC State. My point is that it's far from impossible to pile up wins this year in conference...Marquette and rebuilding Villanova have had no issue. And this is in a year where we at worst match the talent and at best surpass theirs. We are not 3-4 because the Big East is a monster this year, we are 3-4 because we are not a good team. The individual talent is there but the coaching is absolutely not. You can just see it on the players' faces...they seem lost and there doesn't seem to be a real plan. We have begged for bigs for years to no avail. We begged for a real assistant for years to no avail. Bigs were out there and we didn't go all out for them. Real assistants were there and we didn't go all out for them. Fans knew what was wrong and the corrections were available and still none were made. I think that's why fans are so frustrated. When we went from Lavin to Mullin we were expecting an upgrade, but we actually downgraded significantly. Many of us said pre-season that if we can't get it done this year, something seriously wrong. Well, something's seriously wrong. I'll hope for a miracle run like every year that never materializes, but remember this team can't even stay .500 for long let alone going well above it.[/quote]

After 3 accounts here and 1 demotion, you still don't get it. At the drop of the hat you repeat the same stupid crap that a few people here have fabricated. We are 15-4, and not sure but have we even lost a game by double digits? 3-4 after 4 road games projects to something around the .500 mark. You act like we are 1-6. Nonsense, really. I hope there are no pledges in your bv apt and that it's in the basement.[/quote]

Beast, I got one question wiithout some wiseass response.
9-9 gives us 21 wins, do you think that's good enough get to the ncaa tourny with the weak ooc schedule?
Yeah I know we can add wins in the BE tourny, but just asking do you think 21 wins is enough?

Asking because it's NCAA or BUST right? Knowing you, you'll say no.
 
[quote="Beast of the East" post=316616][quote="Mike Zaun" post=316594]I think most people who know of the site and don't post avoid it for the opposite reason. Not the negativity, but the people who constantly attack others for questioning coaches, pointing out the obvious in underachieving, etc. It can't always be rah-rah when you are watching a sinking ship. You can simultaneously hope for the best while also making it clear the experiment is not working for the 4th straight year.

The Big East is a good conference, but Butler and DePaul aren't Syracuse and NC State. My point is that it's far from impossible to pile up wins this year in conference...Marquette and rebuilding Villanova have had no issue. And this is in a year where we at worst match the talent and at best surpass theirs. We are not 3-4 because the Big East is a monster this year, we are 3-4 because we are not a good team. The individual talent is there but the coaching is absolutely not. You can just see it on the players' faces...they seem lost and there doesn't seem to be a real plan. We have begged for bigs for years to no avail. We begged for a real assistant for years to no avail. Bigs were out there and we didn't go all out for them. Real assistants were there and we didn't go all out for them. Fans knew what was wrong and the corrections were available and still none were made. I think that's why fans are so frustrated. When we went from Lavin to Mullin we were expecting an upgrade, but we actually downgraded significantly. Many of us said pre-season that if we can't get it done this year, something seriously wrong. Well, something's seriously wrong. I'll hope for a miracle run like every year that never materializes, but remember this team can't even stay .500 for long let alone going well above it.[/quote]

After 3 accounts here and 1 demotion, you still don't get it. At the drop of the hat you repeat the same stupid crap that a few people here have fabricated. We are 15-4, and not sure but have we even lost a game by double digits? 3-4 after 4 road games projects to something around the .500 mark. You act like we are 1-6. Nonsense, really. I hope there are no pledges in your bv apt and that it's in the basement.[/quote] Let's be fair here... I think it was more than 1 demotion :)
 
Last edited:
[quote="Beast of the East" post=316579][quote="gonzalo" post=316577][quote="Beast of the East" post=316572]

Wennington not a prized recruit.

[/quote]

Bill Wennington was a McDonald´s All-American.[/quote]

I believe Shelton Jones was also. But there was no clamor that we had just snagged a superb player. They both were very solid and both played in the NBA (Wennington 14 seasons of mostly towel waving). But they were far from the category of recruit that could have gone anywhere.[/quote]

"Wennington not a prized recruit"??????
How old were you in 1980?
I don't recall seeing you at any LI Lutheran games to follow the prospective recruit. I recall seeing Ron Rutledge and Brian Mahoney at every game I attended. Heck I think I even saw the Maven at a couple of those games because a mutual friend who once coached in Ozone Park was the head coach. Where were you?
What is propagating negativity has been our record under Chris and Mitch. Their names have not been enough to garner respect from recruits. How many games has Mitch Richmond attended at the prep level? Do you know where he and Chris were when Femi visited? You think that having 8 scholarship players not producing off the bench is "positive" publicity? We have the lowest scoring bench in the conference. Do you think that is balanced recruiting?
Without a star prospect coming next year we may be back to the bottom half of the conference next year after Ponds, Clark and Heron leave.
Wennington not a prized recruit. ???????? Who have our prized recruits been under Mullin?
Are any coming next year?
Stop blaming the fans for our mediocrity.
Hope we turn it around after a 3-4 start but the possibility of finishing below .500 is there once again and the forum posters here that you liberally label as negative have had no impact. Certainly not me, Mike Zaun, Paultz, Delaware, Ron, Usguard, Monte, Chicago, Maher, or anyone else.
We appreciate you continuing to be our flag boy and hope for the best.
 
[quote="oldschool Redmen" post=316617][quote="Beast of the East" post=316616][quote="Mike Zaun" post=316594]I think most people who know of the site and don't post avoid it for the opposite reason. Not the negativity, but the people who constantly attack others for questioning coaches, pointing out the obvious in underachieving, etc. It can't always be rah-rah when you are watching a sinking ship. You can simultaneously hope for the best while also making it clear the experiment is not working for the 4th straight year.

The Big East is a good conference, but Butler and DePaul aren't Syracuse and NC State. My point is that it's far from impossible to pile up wins this year in conference...Marquette and rebuilding Villanova have had no issue. And this is in a year where we at worst match the talent and at best surpass theirs. We are not 3-4 because the Big East is a monster this year, we are 3-4 because we are not a good team. The individual talent is there but the coaching is absolutely not. You can just see it on the players' faces...they seem lost and there doesn't seem to be a real plan. We have begged for bigs for years to no avail. We begged for a real assistant for years to no avail. Bigs were out there and we didn't go all out for them. Real assistants were there and we didn't go all out for them. Fans knew what was wrong and the corrections were available and still none were made. I think that's why fans are so frustrated. When we went from Lavin to Mullin we were expecting an upgrade, but we actually downgraded significantly. Many of us said pre-season that if we can't get it done this year, something seriously wrong. Well, something's seriously wrong. I'll hope for a miracle run like every year that never materializes, but remember this team can't even stay .500 for long let alone going well above it.[/quote]

After 3 accounts here and 1 demotion, you still don't get it. At the drop of the hat you repeat the same stupid crap that a few people here have fabricated. We are 15-4, and not sure but have we even lost a game by double digits? 3-4 after 4 road games projects to something around the .500 mark. You act like we are 1-6. Nonsense, really. I hope there are no pledges in your bv apt and that it's in the basement.[/quote]

Beast, I got one question wiithout some wiseass response.
9-9 gives us 21 wins, do you think that's good enough get to the ncaa tourny with the weak ooc schedule?
Yeah I know we can add wins in the BE tourny, but just asking do you think 21 wins is enough?

Asking because it's NCAA or BUST right? Knowing you, you'll say no.[/quote]

I always thought we would need to be 23-8 , 11-7 to guarantee an NCAA bid. We need one in the Big East Tournament for every game under 23 wins. If we are 21-10 we need two wins in the BET. Just my opinion, could be wrong.
 
[quote="Mean Gene" post=316622][quote="oldschool Redmen" post=316617][quote="Beast of the East" post=316616][quote="Mike Zaun" post=316594]I think most people who know of the site and don't post avoid it for the opposite reason. Not the negativity, but the people who constantly attack others for questioning coaches, pointing out the obvious in underachieving, etc. It can't always be rah-rah when you are watching a sinking ship. You can simultaneously hope for the best while also making it clear the experiment is not working for the 4th straight year.

The Big East is a good conference, but Butler and DePaul aren't Syracuse and NC State. My point is that it's far from impossible to pile up wins this year in conference...Marquette and rebuilding Villanova have had no issue. And this is in a year where we at worst match the talent and at best surpass theirs. We are not 3-4 because the Big East is a monster this year, we are 3-4 because we are not a good team. The individual talent is there but the coaching is absolutely not. You can just see it on the players' faces...they seem lost and there doesn't seem to be a real plan. We have begged for bigs for years to no avail. We begged for a real assistant for years to no avail. Bigs were out there and we didn't go all out for them. Real assistants were there and we didn't go all out for them. Fans knew what was wrong and the corrections were available and still none were made. I think that's why fans are so frustrated. When we went from Lavin to Mullin we were expecting an upgrade, but we actually downgraded significantly. Many of us said pre-season that if we can't get it done this year, something seriously wrong. Well, something's seriously wrong. I'll hope for a miracle run like every year that never materializes, but remember this team can't even stay .500 for long let alone going well above it.[/quote]

After 3 accounts here and 1 demotion, you still don't get it. At the drop of the hat you repeat the same stupid crap that a few people here have fabricated. We are 15-4, and not sure but have we even lost a game by double digits? 3-4 after 4 road games projects to something around the .500 mark. You act like we are 1-6. Nonsense, really. I hope there are no pledges in your bv apt and that it's in the basement.[/quote]

Beast, I got one question wiithout some wiseass response.
9-9 gives us 21 wins, do you think that's good enough get to the ncaa tourny with the weak ooc schedule?
Yeah I know we can add wins in the BE tourny, but just asking do you think 21 wins is enough?

Asking because it's NCAA or BUST right? Knowing you, you'll say no.[/quote]

I always thought we would need to be 23-8 , 11-7 to guarantee an NCAA bid. We need one in the Big East Tournament for every game under 23 wins. If we are 21-10 we need two wins in the BET. Just my opinion, could be wrong.[/quote]

Yeah I thought 11-7 as well, but to me this looks like a 9-9 team, they should be atleast 4+ 500, to me even 10-8 is disapponting. This is Mullin's most talented team.
 
I think 9-9 could get us in, but obviously by no means a lock. That is looking at NET as well as factoring in Q1/Q2 wins and upcoming opportunities. Nearly every game in the BE will be a Q1/Q2 game. I know we're all down on the Butler game, but that was a Q1 opportunity. That's very important when looking at other lesser conferences like the AAC/Pac where half the teams are ranked below 100.

That said, if we go 9-9 we'd probably be playing in Dayton and things could feel a lot like Lavin's final year if we lose the play in. Would people be happy with that result? 10-8 and a BET win needs to be the minimum goal.

If we can't achieve that during a down year in the Big East, we obviously don't deserve to dance.
 
Back
Top