I can see the case for hiring Tom Pecora in some capacity. May not agree with it, but can see the case especially given the general inexperience of our current staff.
Game strategy would not be a part of that case. Have watched many Pecora teams play, especially the last 5 years, and he is one of the worst tacticians I have ever seen at the collegiate level. It's not like his performance at Fordham was in a middling range where it can be discarded or justified. He was 62 games under .500 in 5 seasons and was 13-69 (.159) in A-10 play. That's another level of underperformance.
But that macro-look isn't what is important from an SJU evaluation perspective. He inherited a very difficult situation, so being conservative you can give him the first 3 years at Fordham. In the last 2, at which point he had actually done quite well to elevate the overall talent level on the roster (clearly a defined strength over his career), he had back to back 10-21 seasons and was 2-14/4-14 in conference. Especially in that final season, that team underperformed relative to the talent on the roster, which suggests potential coaching down and not up, the latter of which would be all I could potentially see SJU being interested in from a value-add perspective to the staff at this time.
Further to this point and damaging to Pecora as a game coach was Neubauer arriving and, with what could fairly be called a similar team (minus Villanova-bound Eric Paschall, plus quality guard Chartouny and more overall seniority/experience), and used to coaching up at Eastern Kentucky, goes 17-14/8-11 in Year 1. While Neubauer undoubtedly benefitted from talent Pecora recruited getting to upperclassmen levels, it is likely not a coincidence that he effectively had twice as much success in Year 1 as Pecora had in any of his 5 years. Results are results and there weren't a lot of variables there.
Inexperience acknowledged, at this juncture I don't think we need another old name that's been mentioned around this program forever and that has most recently been associated with significant underperformance. If we had brought him in initially to help guide the intricacies and general management of a 365 day D1 operation, and to assist in getting the recruiting piece off the ground, that would have been one thing.
But it's a new/fresh program now, the recruiting has been astonishing, and given that we just moved on from Slice I'm not sure what Pecora would really bring, especially in a role that isn't likely to move the needle much in the first place. Would rather not recycle another old name and just let Matt A. and St. Jean keep running this thing young and hungry with the pedigree of Mullin/Richmond underwriting the entire operation. It doesn't appear those 4 need much help at the moment.