[quote="Mike Zaun" post=357979][quote="Adam" post=357940]I've disliked this Phavre Phan guy for the past few years because he clogs the #sjubb hashtag with a bunch of nonsense and also provided some awful takes (such as Ponds returning next year).
That said, his podcast is legitimately good and I've listened to all 12 episodes. His sarcastic attitude is a lot more interesting in a podcast form than his Twitter feed. Today he had Jeff Goodman on. I disagree with his take on CMA, but still an interesting listen.
https://twitter.com/phavrephan4/status/1173985670156771330[/quote]
Don't doubt there are funny moments, but using the language and trolly nature he does, not so sure I'd be thrilled if I was a higher up at SJU to be tied in any way to that. IMO you can be sarcastic but also present yourself as a legitimate SJ fan coming out with a cool podcast. Having Brett Favre and a name like Phavre Phan but purporting to be a big SJ fan but also a troll is just odd IMO. It would be like a guy named HoosierFan with an Indiana player as his avatar and a trolling background starting a podcast on the Detroit Lions. Phavre is behind a ton of "SJ fan" accounts on Twitter. Some are funny, I'll admit, just it's just bizarre IMO. Not sure I've ever heard of a troll hosting a podcast and having legitimate people willing to come on.[/quote]
Yeah, I'm surprised that legitimate people have come on but I find that he has handled his guests fine. His demeanor is completely different depending on who he interviews. His Mike Cragg and John Fanta interviews were respectful and more traditional, while his interviews with others (such as Jeff Goodman or any of his St. John's friends) go off the rails but his guests always seem fine with it.
As for branding, yeah he should pivot to something besides Phavre but that doesn't impact the quality. I like his intros/outros (classic rock covers overlaid with his own lyrics) and overall the production is very impressive considering he just started.
Again, I certainly have not been a fan of his but I do think his podcast is solid and he seems mature enough to understand his guest/audience. Unless that changes then I have no problem with the podcast and think it could help St. John's overall.