Class of 72
Active member
Question: Are communists, or those espousing sharing the wealth, allowed to become fabulously wealthy in process of espousing those views, and in process, sharing little of their own new found wealth?
If that's the litmus test, few far left liberals are communist. Then again, neither are most communist world leaders
I don't care if they are communists, socialists, Democrats, Republicans or fascist, all I want is that damn swamp in D.C. drained. So far Trump has not done that and we are in a political quagmire. I am pretty sure my fascist candidate Bernie Sanders would have started draining the swamp by now. Heck, even Mussolini was more of a change maker except for aligning with Nazi Germany.
One of the good things Mussolini did was drain the swamps. Maybe Trump should shave his head.
Are you really sure Sanders would have drained the swamp? Even after being conspired against by the dnc and clinton he aligned with her for political gain. F the millions of college students who saw him as a hope, his ridiculous free tuition and all. He had a real opprtunity to come out against the status wuo cheating dnc, but instead he disappointed his base by being a complicit political hack
No I'm not sure of very much when it comes to politics. It's sad when our political parties have become polar opposites and both are very divisive. There was nothing ridiculous about free tuition for "public" tax supported schools. Public schools are free. In most states college tuition at state schools are a fraction of what they charge non residents. They are practically free now with the various grants and other assistance. In states like California they offer education on par with the best privates. Bernie has dedicated outlets to fight the "status quo" unlike Hillary who was just a "political hack". What's done is done and I hope for the best and like our coach I hope Trump learns quickly while on the job.
I never got the free tuition thing since state colleges are already heavily subsidized by tax dollars and the cost for tuition a fraction of a private education. States such as mn and wi even reciprocate, providing in state tuition rates to each other's residents. My point to current students was, "who do you think will be paying for this if Sander's plan went into effect?" Well, them of course. It was just another entitlement, aimed at securing votes.
Nothing is "free". Eventually the bill comes due, and someone will be left holding the bag. It's like a giant pyramid scheme. But guys like Bernie don't give a damn since they'll be long gone(likely dead) before the shit hits the fan. Those benefiting don't give a damn. Like you said, there is already plenty of financial support available for college education to families that cannot afford it. In NY State there's TAP, amongst other programs, which cover a large chuck of SUNY(8K +) or CUNY(6k+) tuition. But of course there are never enough handout for many of those on the left.[/quote]
Monte, I agree that nothing is free. However, as I said in my post, they are now practically free (excluding Room & Board) when financial support is factored into the equation. As you may know, here in New York State, beginning next school year students can take advantage of The Excelsior Scholarship.
Under this program, more than 940,000 middle-class families and individuals making up to $125,000 per year will qualify to attend college tuition-free at all CUNY and SUNY two- and four-year colleges in New York State.
This is similar to the Sanders proposal but fairer to the tax payers and better for the State.
I firmly believe tuition should be tied to income. Families earning over a quarter million $ should be able to afford the full cost of the already low state tuition. Like the free tuition at our military service academies, students will be required to work in New York for the length of their scholarship, thereby giving something back.
Remember, the very brightest students tend to attend college for free on academic scholarships. Athletes, regardless of I.Q., get free rides. Free tuition for low income and most of the middle class is not that far fetched as some make it to be.
Even subsidizing our health care system can be easily increased to European standards if our bloated military budget was reduced and redirected to health care. As in education, this would help mostly the poor and many middle class citizens while the well-to-do can continue to afford expensive health insurance and go to the best doctors and private hospitals.
If illegal immigrants can utilize our schools and health care for free, why shouldn't most lower income Americans?