Rocket
Well-known member
"NIL gives kids who largely never had much at all, some serious money."To me at least the dots you are trying to connect are very far apart. NIL gives kids who largely never had much at all, some serious money. Point shaving had gamblers like Jack Molinas give kids with nothing a few hundred or thousand bucks to not affect the outcome of games, just the point spread. It's a really big stretch to suppose a college athlete who now has an income source would risk both thst income and his livelihood by trying to gamble and impact the spread.
Interesting thought on your part, but to me if you list all the things wrong with NIL, the increased risk of the renaissance of point shaving would not exist on my list.
You also used terms like point "shaving", point "spread", "big stretch", income source and livelihood.
Interesting thought on your part, but I think you are referring to NIL as it compares to OnlyFans.