Mike Anderson - Recruiting, Coaching, Etc.

Mean Gene" post=412073 said:
look at Pikiell's record his first three years at Rutgers. 
Good thing I know he's had some rough years, because that format tells me nothing. :cool:
 
Mean Gene" post=412073 said:
look at Pikiell's record his first three years at Rutgers. Let's see how all this plays out. Rutgers Scarlet Knights (Big Ten Conference) (2016–present)2016–17Rutgers15–183–1514th 2017–18Rutgers15–193–1514th 2018–19Rutgers14–177–13T–10th 2019–20Rutgers20–1111–9T–5thNCAA Division I Canceled2020–21Rutgers7–13–1


Pikiell took over a team that went 1-17 in conference the year before he arrived.  Over his first 3 years he went:
3-15
7-13
11-9

Why would Rutgers consider firing him when he showed fairly substantial improvement every year?  
 
Monte" post=412080 said:
Mean Gene" post=412073 said:
look at Pikiell's record his first three years at Rutgers. Let's see how all this plays out. Rutgers Scarlet Knights (Big Ten Conference) (2016–present)2016–17Rutgers15–183–1514th 2017–18Rutgers15–193–1514th 2018–19Rutgers14–177–13T–10th 2019–20Rutgers20–1111–9T–5thNCAA Division I Canceled2020–21Rutgers7–13–1


Pikiell took over a team that went 1-17 in conference the year before he arrived.  Over his first 3 years he went:
3-15
7-13
11-9

Why would Rutgers consider firing him when he showed fairly substantial improvement every year?  
Yep. Trajectory is key. While, in my opinion, it is too early to judge CMA, I can understand the concern. The current  trajectory is not what was expected. Overall play, without even considering results, is not trending upward right now, In fairness, lot of new pieces and a freshmen PG. So, this could change as season progresses. 

However, fair to say, that right now we're not on the upward climb for which we had hoped. Not laying it totally at the feet of the Jucos but, as juniors (albeit 1st year D1), I believe more was expected. The fact that Moore isn't starting on a team with size issues says something. And, Cole's inconsistency and lack of assertiveness has resulted in less PT and production than we probably expected. Again, they are new to D1, deserve an adjustment period and may turn things around later this year or next.

Adding to this is the lack of highly ranked recruits giving us serious consideration and fans are naturally concerned.

Again, it's year 2 and probably unrealistic expectations, for many, including myself. Still in CMA's corner and think he can get it done. But, we'll need a home run at some point.
 
Here's a take I haven't heard too often, and this isn't meant to be used as any type of excused, I'm just as frustrated as everyone else. CMA entered a Big East conference, a league that has been annually among the top 3 conferences RPI wise. What he was left with by the previous campaign essentially was an empty cupboard. Now, he's battling the likes of Villanova, Providence, Xavier, Butler, Creighton, Marquette, and Seton Hall, all of who have had pretty good runs of success and made the NCAA tournament each most times over the past 5 years. These programs have been simply reloading talent and building on their success. I'm not sure it was ever going to be realistic to have a coach go from an empty cupboard to top of the Big East standings in year 2, when going up against successful programs who have simply been reloading year after year, when CMA was essentially starting from scratch. How was he supposed to immedietely leapfrog those teams? 

No, I'm not happy with recruiting, or giving a pass to anyone. Just trying to put things in a different perspective. 
 
Room112" post=412130 said:
Here's a take I haven't heard too often, and this isn't meant to be used as any type of excused, I'm just as frustrated as everyone else. CMA entered a Big East conference, a league that has been annually among the top 3 conferences RPI wise. What he was left with by the previous campaign essentially was an empty cupboard. Now, he's battling the likes of Villanova, Providence, Xavier, Butler, Creighton, Marquette, and Seton Hall, all of who have had pretty good runs of success and made the NCAA tournament each most times over the past 5 years. These programs have been simply reloading talent and building on their success. I'm not sure it was ever going to be realistic to have a coach go from an empty cupboard to top of the Big East standings in year 2, when going up against successful programs who have simply been reloading year after year, when CMA was essentially starting from scratch. How was he supposed to immedietely leapfrog those teams? 

No, I'm not happy with recruiting, or giving a pass to anyone. Just trying to put things in a different perspective. 

He was not left with a stacked team, but nor was he left with an empty cupboard. He was left with 2 preseason all-big east players(granted Heron was hurt) and a group of decent roll players. Then he grabbed Dunn and Rutherford, both of whom turned out to be pleasant surprises. Mullin was left with an empty cupboard. All of that aside, no one is criticizing CMA for what the team did last year. Most everyone gave him a pass last year and most of us were hoping a slight improvement this year, with an eye toward the future in the form of some higher ranked recruits. This year has been very discouraging so far(there's still time) and our recruiting does not look promising. Not about to throw in the towel on CMA, but those combination of factors, don't exactly have me encouraged about the future. 


 
 
Last edited:
One thing I gotta say: CMA took the job here knowing fully what our limitations are(lack of facilities, etc) and what  we've endured over the past 20+ years. In spite of those 2 factors, he came here expecting to turn around our program. He knew EXACTLY what he was getting in to. If he didnt think he could turn around our program, I assume he wouldn't have taken the job. So as far as I'm concerned, if those factors did not prevent a successful coach like him from taking the job, then those factors should not be used as excuses now. We are who we are; imperfect. Lots of schools have issues and are still successful. Fix the issues you can, work around the issues that you can't fix. Excuses are for losers. 
 
Last edited:
Monte" post=412142 said:
One thing I gotta say: CMA took the job here knowing fully what our limitations are(lack of facilities, etc) and what  we've endured over the past 20+ years. In spite of those 2 factors, he came here expecting to turn around our program. He knew EXACTLY what he was getting in to. If he didnt think he could turn around our program, I assume he wouldn't have taken the job. So as far as I'm concerned, if those factors did not prevent a successful coach like him from taking the job, then those factors should not be used as excuses now. We are who we are; imperfect. Lots of schools have issues and are still successful. Fix the issues you can, work around the issues that you can't fix. Excuses are for losers. 
Maybe he just didn't like being unemployed and took the $2 million a year without fully exploring? Wasn't he on a plane 24 hours after first being contacted? How much investigation did he do?

*Not making an excuse for him. Just wondering how this all really played out with relation to your comment.
 
I get Monte's point, but have to agree w/ LJSA too.  Most coaches have a strong desire to win and be successful no matter the odds, but the hire was so quick.  Hard to pass up $2M+/yr plus when alternative was being retired for at least a year to think longer term options that probably would not be in a power conference again. Not like it was a small $ decision...it was millions, and can't blame him.  With him here and the cash, I'm sure he wants to win. 

Still want to give him time and think he can do OK, but unlikely great. I'm past the 40 min of hell that is a great topic for the TV commentators. Anderson knows that too, but goes with it when asked.

   I think the challenge will squarely be on recruiting ability and think we're in such a tough spot that we really need someone bolder in that area with a very creative and unorthodox approach.  Anderson seems like such a nice guy, but don't see him acting the role of a salesman at times needed tied to recruits... Think Steve Lavin was perfect in that regard, with his gift with words and persuasion, and who knows if a bit of rule bending.
 
 
Last edited:
L J S A" post=412143 said:
Monte" post=412142 said:
One thing I gotta say: CMA took the job here knowing fully what our limitations are(lack of facilities, etc) and what  we've endured over the past 20+ years. In spite of those 2 factors, he came here expecting to turn around our program. He knew EXACTLY what he was getting in to. If he didnt think he could turn around our program, I assume he wouldn't have taken the job. So as far as I'm concerned, if those factors did not prevent a successful coach like him from taking the job, then those factors should not be used as excuses now. We are who we are; imperfect. Lots of schools have issues and are still successful. Fix the issues you can, work around the issues that you can't fix. Excuses are for losers. 
Maybe he just didn't like being unemployed and took the $2 million a year without fully exploring? Wasn't he on a plane 24 hours after first being contacted? How much investigation did he do?

*Not making an excuse for him. Just wondering how this all really played out with relation to your comment.
I think you both are correct. No one likes to be let go and CMA is clearly a proud man having achieved so much in his life. As LJSA points out Who  would not have jumped at $2.5 million a season in a power conference at a school with a great tradition, in one of the greatest cities in the world, with a fertile recruiting area. On the other hand i agree with Monte that one visit to the school and in 5 minutes he realized he was in the same shit gym as he was when he started 18 years ago at UAB, an inner city school in a low mid major conference that stretches a few blocks, and light years from the University of Missouri and the University of Arkansas. Forget the players dorms, the campus, the weight room, the boosters, the players cafeteria, those factors don't even enter the equation. He also knew Kevin Willard and Ed Cooley had taken their schools to the big dance for 5 straight seasons, that Jay Wright is as good as there is, that McDermott is a great coach, that other than DePaul and Georgetown there are no easy in conference games. Only a blind man could not have known what he was getting into. 
having said that getting Champagne, McGriff, Rutherford etc in 15 minutes was very good as was Posh, Wusu, Moore and Cole in 4 months. 
his second full class was a tad disappointing, no pizzaz there but hopefully all three players will play above their rankings. But from where we sit today there is nothing exciting to discuss recruiting wise and unless recruiting picks up, notwithstanding the good coaching and player development I don't see a move up in the standings in the near future. 
 
I would just like to add, with CMA and his staff, at least the effort is there. The results have certainly been disappointing and the future might not look bright right now, but you can't say him and the staff aren't putting the work in. I could not always say the same about the previous two regimes unfortunately. So at least he's not milking it just for the paycheck. 
 
Room112" post=412151 said:
I would just like to add, with CMA and his staff, at least the effort is there. The results have certainly been disappointing and the future might not look bright right now, but you can't say him and the staff aren't putting the work in. I could not always say the same about the previous two regimes unfortunately. So at least he's not milking it just for the paycheck. 


Excellent point. Very well said
 
L J S A" post=412143 said:
Monte" post=412142 said:
One thing I gotta say: CMA took the job here knowing fully what our limitations are(lack of facilities, etc) and what  we've endured over the past 20+ years. In spite of those 2 factors, he came here expecting to turn around our program. He knew EXACTLY what he was getting in to. If he didnt think he could turn around our program, I assume he wouldn't have taken the job. So as far as I'm concerned, if those factors did not prevent a successful coach like him from taking the job, then those factors should not be used as excuses now. We are who we are; imperfect. Lots of schools have issues and are still successful. Fix the issues you can, work around the issues that you can't fix. Excuses are for losers. 
Maybe he just didn't like being unemployed and took the $2 million a year without fully exploring? Wasn't he on a plane 24 hours after first being contacted? How much investigation did he do?

*Not making an excuse for him. Just wondering how this all really played out with relation to your comment.

Coincidentally was just having that conversation with another poster about the same thing you mention. Let's face facts, 2 Mil salary HC jobs, for recently termintated 60 year old coaches,  don't hang on trees. I don't blame CMA for jumping at the opportunity when it presented itself, and I don't blame the school for presenting it. Especially in light of the other less-then-steller options. But at some point over next few years, the school is going to have to decide what thier plans are for the future of our program. Because right now, the future feels just about as bleak as the past. 
 
 
In order of minutes played, here’s the number of games our top 8 has played under CMA:

Champ - 42
Posh - 12
Williams - 43
Cole - 12
Dunn- 36
Wusu - 12
Moore - 12
Earlington - 44



We all know CMA is a system coach. Systems take time to learn and to incorporate. Those 8 guys AT MOST have 12 games together. Half of them havnt played 15 games at sju. He does not have the equivalent of one upperclassmen of his own who has been in his system for 2+ years. 

If you disagree with his system and whether or not it can win at SJU that is fair. If you think his in game coaching is gonna prevent him from getting into the top half the BE thats also reasonable. There’s plenty of decisions I don’t agree with but that is every coach and every fan base. 

There certainly hasn’t been much to be happy with this BE season, but I need to wait to see what happens when he has some upperclassmen of his own before I know he can't get it done at SJU. 
 
Cole has the tools to be a good contributor, but it seems like he hasn't found his comfort level yet (contrast to Moore, who has).  I'd like to see more of the ball finding him for spot-up 3s, and less of him trying to create in traffic.  Unfortunately our offensive sets look nothing like Creighton or Nova which may be a problem for him.
 
I'd like to see our guards drive and kick some instead of drive and force up something.  That's where a guy like Cole could thrive.
 
Last edited:
Anthony Mattia" post=412317 said:
I'd like to see our guards drive and kick some instead of drive and force up something.  That's where a guy like Cole could thrive.
 

One million percent yes
 
lawmanfan" post=412321 said:
Anthony Mattia" post=412317 said:
I'd like to see our guards drive and kick some instead of drive and force up something.  That's where a guy like Cole could thrive.

 

One million percent yes
The great penetrators keep all of their options in their back pocket.   The guys who start to drive with the singular purpose of shooting disregard their teammates nad put themselves in a position on the floor where the only remaining option is a forced layup.

The best guards instinctively tell teammates with words or not, "You get open and I'll get you the ball"   When guards don't do that, 4 guys stand around watching one guy force it up.
 
Back
Top