The 13.4 points and 5.5 rebounds on the face of it aren't bad. The shooting percentage and turnovers are not good. If he averages 13.4 points next year but shoots better and turns the ball over less and yes passes the ball some then he will be a much improved player. There are so many rebounds to be had on a poor rebounding team that Ponds has 4.6 a game.Ahmed needs to really get smarter on the court. He is not a terrible three point shooter and could probably even improve a little. What shocks me is his shooting percentage from two which results from wild drives instead of more set plays. The coaches have to get him to want to be a team player and learn how to take it to the basket.
What FG% do you think he should be shooting?
If he could manage 20 points and 10 rebounds with six or so assists and shoot 70 percent from the floor and 50 percent from three that would be acceptable to me as long as he cut down on his turnovers.
Over his last eight games he's averaging 16 points (on about 50 percent from the floor, 45-96) and 6 rebounds; in those eight games he has a 1:1.5 ATO: eight assists and 12 turnovers. Nobody credits him for the raw numbers - which are comparable to those that any number of well regarded players like Shelton Jones put up as upperclassmen - or for being vastly improved over what he was two months ago. Which he obviously is. Would he be a better player if he passed the ball more and turned the ball over less? Yes, as would every other player in college basketball. And if he did the nicest thing anyone would say about him is that he's a reformed street baller who finally reined in his selfish me first attitude.