VERY disappointing loss. This game was winnable. 2 reasons for the loss (there are more than 2, but these are the top 2):
5 for 13
3 for 13
I am having a hard time understanding the Marco sycophants who seem to think would have been the answer late. If anything, Jones earned to play more down the stretch today, and his offensive energy would have possibly made a difference. Marco has shown over the last 4 or 5 games that he is not that great shooter we hoped he would be. He had plenty of open looks and missed most of them. Failed to step up, time to move on.
Other thoughts:
1. Branch still not back to form; need him to be more productive on offense. Think he'll be good next year. Also want to see some take charge leadership from him.
2. Boarding still a weakness, though CO has improved. Early in 2nd half, Marquette got too many second and third (and a few fourth) tries.
3. Chris O will be a beast with another year or 2 under his belt. I think his offensive game will improve dramatically, and hopefully his foul shooting. But, on defense, I don't recall many other college players with the game-changeability he has, certainly not at St. John's. Should be real good for us at least another 2 years. (Think poor man's Okefor)
4. Seems like the staff's decision to give Jones almost no burn all year may have been a miscalculation, as he showed today that he can contribute, especially on offense, where this team is really challenged. Lavin said as much in his interviews this week. Today, it showed that the kid can contribute if given the opportunity (as opposed to Marco). Will be interesting to see if he sticks around or if he looks to transfer, but I think he could develop into a very productive role player. Maybe more upside than Garrett.
5. Greene showed the haters that he has some game, and that he can be good. He needs to be more consistent, dribble less, etc. but I think he will be a very good player for 4 years. Has to be consistent offensively. Other than Hill, hardy and DLo, maybe the most talented guard here in the past 10 years.
All in all, this game was a microcosm of the season. Streaky play, very athletic talent, poor shooting and FT shooting, too many turnovers due to sloppy passes, inconsistent effort at the beginning of a half. Hopefully, many of these are maturity related, and that next year, they will be improved and more disciplined. It is hard to surmise of what would have happened today with our 2 banished players, but it is not a leap to say that this could have been in the W column, almost guaranteeing an NIT bid. Now, we still have to sweat it.