Ray Morgan
Well-known member
The bottom line is, after five years, Lavin should have this program in a much better place. Not only have the results been poor, the program's outlook is not promising.
Consider how the future looks for teams like Seton Hall, Georgetown, Marquette, Butler, Villanova, Xavier and Providence. They not only have a chance to dance, they also have balanced rosters and/or big recruiting classes signed (i.e. Marquette). Unfortunately, as of now, we are left behind with Creighton and DePaul, both of whom have beat us this year.
Laslty, considering the year Oliver Purnell is having with DePaul, is Lavin the worst coach in the Big East? You could certainly make that case.
Let's move on. We can do better.
You said the magic words, "balanced roster". That is the job of the coach. On the interview of Lavin someone posted earlier today, I heard excuses about injuries and about his focus on his team playing well beginning February. Everyone has injuries and banged up players. That's why you recruit with depth in mind and back-ups for each position. I really thought that after that first recruiting class, we struck gold. Then came the non-quals and the other issues. I'm not one to normally put much stock into articles written by disgruntled UCLA fans or bloggers. However, reading the articles warning us about Lavin, almost everything said was spot on. Certainly sounded like our guy.