It is difficult to compare stats against competing players. Some are inarguable: FT % for one. PPG is very much arguable. Where it's very nice to have Champ as the Big East scoring leader, no one would deny that on a very good balanced team, his PPG might decrease considerably without diminishing his contribution. Assists in laudable, but again, there are other stats not as visible. CMA tracks the pass that leads to the assist, and again, if one PG has the ball in his handmore often than on a team with a skilled 5 that move the ball, he will likely have more assists. Conversely, a PG who has the ball more often, will likely commit more turnovers, even if turnovers is a raw number that you want to minimize. Even rebounds are suspect to some degree. I always favor guys with great fundamentals who always work hard to box out underneath. Often, they don't get the rebound, but by boxing out another big man, one of their teammates might.
So what you're saying is that there are "lies, damned lies, and statistics". lol