1. If you can't even play at Harvard, how good can you possibly be? Why would Harvard keep him on the bench if he's so good? It's a genuinely logical reservation to have. From what I hear he is an insanely good shooter, but it makes me wonder why he couldn't even start at a much worse basketball school than us.
2. So you can scout players better than Rivals? If so, then great! You can be our insider. Using your logic, nothing on Rivals is to be attributed to a prospect meaning good players and bad players are not distinguishable.
3. High school caliber is the same as McDermott doing what he's doing at Duke instead of Creighton. It means more if you excel against the best, not just the mediocre or weak.
4. Bourgault has shown flashes, but really cooled down and hasn't given reason yet to believe he is truly a consistent 3 pt guy. He still has barely played for us. Him and Hooper are not multi-tool scorers. Severe is. Would you rather guys who can score 3 different ways, or 1 different way? Not hard to pick that one.
Just seems like Severe has more tools.
Did you know his situation at Harvard? Elaborate, if you know the situation. I think he had stopped playing before the Christmas holidays, if I'm correct.
Once again, what does what Rivals say has to do with Severe being a known player, and Bourgault and Hooper being unknowns? By the way, I never said Rivals was wrong with Severe, but it's possible it could be some exaggeration. He could very, well be an "outstanding" shooter, but I've been around long enough to know that isn't always the case with kids coming in from high school to college. Not to mention, I've been told that Severe tends to be a "chucker." I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, as I've yet to see him play. I'll also say that I'm confident in my assertion of talent when I get a chance to see a player in action.
If you knew anything about talent translation, then you'd know a kid like McDermott could do the same thing at Duke or any, other high, major program that he's currently doing at Creighton. But you don't know that, so why bother.
Bourgault and Hooper doesn't have to be multi-level scorers to have an effect on a game. Have you ever seen Severe play or just rambling like you usually do? Whether, Severe has been able to score from all levels in high school doesn't necessarily means it's gonna translate to the collegiate game. He could do so; it could take time; or it may never transpire. If he were to come to St. John's, then I'll root for him like any, other player that has donned a Johnnies jersey since I've been a fan. But your argument is weak, per usual.
The discussion was about you trying to denigrate the games of Bourgault and Hooper in an attempt to build up Severe. That isn't a way to present an argument, as it'll be shot down every, single time.
All I can tell you is we will see. Regardless of people's opinion's of me and whether they want to admit this or not, I have been right many times before about my predictions while others were calling me an idiot. I think he would be a better contributor offensively than Hooper or Marco. But hey, if Marco. and Hooper somehow turn into JJ Reddick I will be a happy customer.
.Not seeing either Marco or Hooper play prior to them joining the team would take staff and coaches word on their shooting ability That being said .I know coach knows talent better than any member on this board So I am pleased whoever we recruit.