Hire Mike Rice

Re. Slice-Isn't non-performance cause for termination?
 
Re. Slice-Isn't non-performance cause for termination?

Non performance? Very difficult to prove - did he show up at practices and games? Did he hit the recruiting trail when asked to do so. Poor results aren't typically termination with cause. If it can be proven he was insubordinate with a paper trail that may be a reason to TWC. All in all SJU can continue to pay him, or just negotiate a lump sum buyout, which is probably what Cal is talking about.

The closer to the full amount SJU pays, the more they will want an expended payment schedule.

Meanwhile, Slice gets paid almost $42K per month, so he can be in no rush
 
I thought Slice resigned.

Slice did not resign and will not resign and has an iron clad contract. There obviously are not grounds for termination so he continues to get paid. We can only hope he wants to return to coaching and finds something suitable, meaning very high paying, so that we can get out of this financial burden.

It takes two parties to agree to a contract. The folks on our side of the table need to be held accountable. If that means coming up with 400k per year it should start with the president, anyone acting as legal counsel and end with Mullin. If it is truly such a huge financial burden then the program will have a big problem ever being competitive in the Big East. If this level of incompetent management gets a pass it sends a very bad message to alums and damages endowment trust. What has been going on is almost unprecedented at any Power 6 basketball school.

I mean how is this not on Olivia? Good guy, but this just seems to be an unprofessional contract he entered into. Anyone know if we are paying an outside firm to represent us? Or are we keeping it in house?

The likelihood is the essence of the contract Slice signed has been used many times in the past, especially termination clauses. What i would expect would be different is that the severance pay for termination without cause would oay him the entire salary due him.over the remaining term. That is likely what Slice insisted on to make the move to SJU and Mullin supported that. I'm guessing in the end Slice asked out but also wouldn't resign, and instead asked to be terminated without cause. Because the personal vitriol between Mullin and Slice made the situation untenable the university only had 2 options - to terminate him without cause or to perpetuate a horrible animosity between the 2. At that point there was no turning back once Slice and Mullin wanted no oart of each other. More than a bad contract the mere fact that it was long term guaranteed caused this to occur. If Sluce were 40 and could get a job in that salary range the university had some negotiating leverage. Slice has apparently made the decision to sit out 4 years and get paid, but very possibly he gets oaid AND can seek employment elsewhere

So then what was Cal talking about when he said that the school and Slice ought to resolve this? Whats to resolve? I assume if the school could get away with any kind of buy out it would do so. If I may quote Henry Hill
sounds like Slice is gonna kick back for the next 3+ years while he says to the school "Business is bad? F you, pay me!"

I'm guessing it would be the price of the buyout. Slice is in year 2 of a 5 year contract. SJU likely would offer or has offered 1 year severance. Slice probably would easily give up 1 year to get paid in a lump sum. Artful negotiation requires skill and I expect that if both sides give a little it can be resolved. My guess, since Slice holds the cards, is SJU pays him all but 1.5 to 2 years.
 
I thought Slice resigned.

Slice did not resign and will not resign and has an iron clad contract. There obviously are not grounds for termination so he continues to get paid. We can only hope he wants to return to coaching and finds something suitable, meaning very high paying, so that we can get out of this financial burden.

It takes two parties to agree to a contract. The folks on our side of the table need to be held accountable. If that means coming up with 400k per year it should start with the president, anyone acting as legal counsel and end with Mullin. If it is truly such a huge financial burden then the program will have a big problem ever being competitive in the Big East. If this level of incompetent management gets a pass it sends a very bad message to alums and damages endowment trust. What has been going on is almost unprecedented at any Power 6 basketball school.

I mean how is this not on Olivia? Good guy, but this just seems to be an unprofessional contract he entered into. Anyone know if we are paying an outside firm to represent us? Or are we keeping it in house?

The likelihood is the essence of the contract Slice signed has been used many times in the past, especially termination clauses. What i would expect would be different is that the severance pay for termination without cause would oay him the entire salary due him.over the remaining term. That is likely what Slice insisted on to make the move to SJU and Mullin supported that. I'm guessing in the end Slice asked out but also wouldn't resign, and instead asked to be terminated without cause. Because the personal vitriol between Mullin and Slice made the situation untenable the university only had 2 options - to terminate him without cause or to perpetuate a horrible animosity between the 2. At that point there was no turning back once Slice and Mullin wanted no oart of each other. More than a bad contract the mere fact that it was long term guaranteed caused this to occur. If Sluce were 40 and could get a job in that salary range the university had some negotiating leverage. Slice has apparently made the decision to sit out 4 years and get paid, but very possibly he gets oaid AND can seek employment elsewhere

So then what was Cal talking about when he said that the school and Slice ought to resolve this? Whats to resolve? I assume if the school could get away with any kind of buy out it would do so. If I may quote Henry Hill
sounds like Slice is gonna kick back for the next 3+ years while he says to the school "Business is bad? F you, pay me!"

I'm guessing it would be the price of the buyout. Slice is in year 2 of a 5 year contract. SJU likely would offer or has offered 1 year severance. Slice probably would easily give up 1 year to get paid in a lump sum. Artful negotiation requires skill and I expect that if both sides give a little it can be resolved. My guess, since Slice holds the cards, is SJU pays him all but 1.5 to 2 years.

So he only work here for 1 year, out of the 5 year contract. I'd say a good deal for him.

So why not just keep him on the bench, I mean yeah Richmond is a hof'er, but what is he doing?

That is crazy. A 5 year contract but just worked 1 year of it.
It's the way it goes at SJU.
 
In an effort to get us back on topic.

Wikileaks just released this transcript:

Bobby G: “Ah, Mike…Did you see the game last night? About that interview, I think we are fine for this season. Please call me after the DePaul game…. We’ll talk... Happy Holidays"

Click
 
I thought Slice resigned.

Slice did not resign and will not resign and has an iron clad contract. There obviously are not grounds for termination so he continues to get paid. We can only hope he wants to return to coaching and finds something suitable, meaning very high paying, so that we can get out of this financial burden.

Could we insist that he show up for work, and then reassign him to clean toilets or some other horrible job that will make him want to resign? Or fire him with cause when he refuses new assignment?

No we could not as that would be a clear case of constructive dismissal.

And then who would really want to be employed at SJU
 
Federico Mussini would thrive under Mike Rice. Malik Ellison not so much.

c48a28b3aa3ee174e025920ad68faf840ab42dff496556088293d602fec3f65e.jpg
[/quote]
 
Federico Mussini would thrive under Mike Rice. Malik Ellison not so much.

c48a28b3aa3ee174e025920ad68faf840ab42dff496556088293d602fec3f65e.jpg
[/quote]

Yeah, someone posted it earlier. I do think Ellison and Ahmed would promptly send Mike Rice back to anger management rehab.
 
I am a convert. I was one of the biggest Rice detractors. He always knew how to coach. Never took that away from him.

But I vehemently disliked his crazy antics on the sidelines while he was coach at Rutgers. He was a madman.

But he served his penance, and he received help. As someone who knows all too well how abuses and personality disorders can ravage the soul, getting therapy and then following through on that therapy is imperative.

And when one of our own, D'Angelo Harrison, who had his own demons, speaks highly about Rice, even better. Bring him in. Rice would run here to be on Mullin's staff.
 
Not "getting" the let's hire Mike Rice movement. However knowledgeable Rice might be, is adding a former Division I HC -- and volatile one at that -- to CM's staff a good idea, especially after the ill-fated (and costly) ego-driven Mullin/Slice split. Given their personalities, seems to me that hiring Rice would be a potential disaster. And as a recruiter, no doubt his reputation would precede him. Would you want your kid to commit to a guy who's widely perceived as both both physically and psychologically abusive? I don't think so. I'm all for second chances, and I think Rice deserves one and knows the game better than most -- but would prefer that that he proves he's changed at another Division 1 program.
 
Not "getting" the let's hire Mike Rice movement. However knowledgeable Rice might be, is adding a former Division I HC -- and volatile one at that -- to CM's staff a good idea, especially after the ill-fated (and costly) ego-driven Mullin/Slice split. Given their personalities, seems to me that hiring Rice would be a potential disaster. And as a recruiter, no doubt his reputation would precede him. Would you want your kid to commit to a guy who's widely perceived as both both physically and psychologically abusive? I don't think so. I'm all for second chances, and I think Rice deserves one and knows the game better than most -- but would prefer that that he proves he's changed at another Division 1 program.
Parents already letting their kids play for Rice and they are even younger than college kids. Plus he would be an assistant and Mullin would be there to oversee and it seems Chris has not even raised his voice to a player in the two years he has been coaching.
 
The main difference between Rice and Slice was that Rice at least had some success as a HC. I can almost forgive his 3 below average years at Rutgers because Rutgers is terrible.
 
Not "getting" the let's hire Mike Rice movement. However knowledgeable Rice might be, is adding a former Division I HC -- and volatile one at that -- to CM's staff a good idea, especially after the ill-fated (and costly) ego-driven Mullin/Slice split. Given their personalities, seems to me that hiring Rice would be a potential disaster. And as a recruiter, no doubt his reputation would precede him. Would you want your kid to commit to a guy who's widely perceived as both both physically and psychologically abusive? I don't think so. I'm all for second chances, and I think Rice deserves one and knows the game better than most -- but would prefer that that he proves he's changed at another Division 1 program.

I tend to agree with you in that I don't get it but not so much on the potential Mullin conflict (I don't buy into that common mythology about why Slice was fired) but rather for the other reasons you mentioned. Talk about recruiting fodder. So how long until we are in a recruiting battle and the video comes out? Seems like the answer is: first time and every time after that one way or another.
 
We still do not have good enough players to properly assess what kind of coach Chris Mullin and his staff are.
We have the worst front court in BE history. Seriously even Norm had Lamont Hamilton. Heck we could use Aaron Spears.
MY point that we recruited too many Div 2 or 3 players thus causing our many lopsided loses Our recruiting , outside of 3 players would be benches players on most BE teams Also our coaching this yr and last need much improvement for us to compete at the top of the league That may seem harsh but seems to me at this point really only Ponds is very special Marcus need still to develop his game ,Amed can become special with patience,better shot selection We were hurt it seem many games with our Guard size smaller guards defending top big guards on the def end But have to say when we were playing like a team ,creating and hitting shots we were there Freunberg is a mystery Can not figure that situation out
He seems he should be a very good player has a good shot,def needs to prove etc but why would we recruit him? Also seeing such little time his chance of improving was handicapped I know some of this opinion may seem harsh but just hoping we see much improvement Maybe we can put it all together next yr I know stars could not mean much but a few 5* players could possibly turns us around
 
So let's say we do hire Rice. What makes anyone think he'll hang around for more than a year or two at the most? He's already been mentioned as a potential HC at Duquesne and Quinipiac. Don't you think he'll bolt at the first opportunity that presents itself?
 
So let's say we do hire Rice. What makes anyone think he'll hang around for more than a year or two at the most? He's already been mentioned as a potential HC at Duquesne and Quinipiac. Don't you think he'll bolt at the first opportunity that presents itself?

Of course any assistant would bolt for an HC role. But it would be good for CM to see how other Div I coaches run things, and get some insight in that regard.
 
Not "getting" the let's hire Mike Rice movement. However knowledgeable Rice might be, is adding a former Division I HC -- and volatile one at that -- to CM's staff a good idea, especially after the ill-fated (and costly) ego-driven Mullin/Slice split. Given their personalities, seems to me that hiring Rice would be a potential disaster. And as a recruiter, no doubt his reputation would precede him. Would you want your kid to commit to a guy who's widely perceived as both both physically and psychologically abusive? I don't think so. I'm all for second chances, and I think Rice deserves one and knows the game better than most -- but would prefer that that he proves he's changed at another Division 1 program.
Parents already letting their kids play for Rice and they are even younger than college kids. Plus he would be an assistant and Mullin would be there to oversee and it seems Chris has not even raised his voice to a player in the two years he has been coaching.

What gets lost in all the shuffle with the Rice stint at Rutgers is the lack of complaints by the players who played for him, the ones who who were supposedly "abused." I won't discuss opinions on this because I perfectly well understand his behavior is totally unacceptable in today's world. I am not sure that makes for a better world though. Life's best lessons are learned by dealing with adversity and understanding life isn't fair or always easy. However, I come from a completely different generation, one where you stood your ground and fought, not run to "Mommy".
 
Not "getting" the let's hire Mike Rice movement. However knowledgeable Rice might be, is adding a former Division I HC -- and volatile one at that -- to CM's staff a good idea, especially after the ill-fated (and costly) ego-driven Mullin/Slice split. Given their personalities, seems to me that hiring Rice would be a potential disaster. And as a recruiter, no doubt his reputation would precede him. Would you want your kid to commit to a guy who's widely perceived as both both physically and psychologically abusive? I don't think so. I'm all for second chances, and I think Rice deserves one and knows the game better than most -- but would prefer that that he proves he's changed at another Division 1 program.
Parents already letting their kids play for Rice and they are even younger than college kids. Plus he would be an assistant and Mullin would be there to oversee and it seems Chris has not even raised his voice to a player in the two years he has been coaching.

What gets lost in all the shuffle with the Rice stint at Rutgers is the lack of complaints by the players who played for him, the ones who who were supposedly "abused." I won't discuss opinions on this because I perfectly well understand his behavior is totally unacceptable in today's world. I am not sure that makes for a better world though. Life's best lessons are learned by dealing with adversity and understanding life isn't fair or always easy. However, I come from a completely different generation, one where you stood your ground and fought, not run to "Mommy".

I don't think we're talking about the same thing. I respect discipline and "manning up" (probably not PC to even use that term any more) but you are not teaching discipline when you yourself are not disciplined. It is one thing to be passionate and intense and another to be an out of control lunatic. I had a coach grab one of my teammates by the hair and drag him out of the gym by his hair. (way) Back then I thought - what an A-hole. I still think that, but don't feel the same way about other coaches who did things that would not be acceptable today. Even if you get past the beaning players with balls and grabbing and shoving them. A grown man in a leadership position over young people and representing a large, public, educational institution in one of its most prominent roles, using homophobic slurs in the 21st century is not in control of himself. I've got nothing against the guy but even if he's permanently past all that, I still don't get the desire to hire him.
 
Back
Top