But just by being removed from the situation he is outperforming the rest of the staff.Re. Slice-Isn't non-performance cause for termination?
Re. Slice-Isn't non-performance cause for termination?
I thought Slice resigned.
Slice did not resign and will not resign and has an iron clad contract. There obviously are not grounds for termination so he continues to get paid. We can only hope he wants to return to coaching and finds something suitable, meaning very high paying, so that we can get out of this financial burden.
It takes two parties to agree to a contract. The folks on our side of the table need to be held accountable. If that means coming up with 400k per year it should start with the president, anyone acting as legal counsel and end with Mullin. If it is truly such a huge financial burden then the program will have a big problem ever being competitive in the Big East. If this level of incompetent management gets a pass it sends a very bad message to alums and damages endowment trust. What has been going on is almost unprecedented at any Power 6 basketball school.
I mean how is this not on Olivia? Good guy, but this just seems to be an unprofessional contract he entered into. Anyone know if we are paying an outside firm to represent us? Or are we keeping it in house?
The likelihood is the essence of the contract Slice signed has been used many times in the past, especially termination clauses. What i would expect would be different is that the severance pay for termination without cause would oay him the entire salary due him.over the remaining term. That is likely what Slice insisted on to make the move to SJU and Mullin supported that. I'm guessing in the end Slice asked out but also wouldn't resign, and instead asked to be terminated without cause. Because the personal vitriol between Mullin and Slice made the situation untenable the university only had 2 options - to terminate him without cause or to perpetuate a horrible animosity between the 2. At that point there was no turning back once Slice and Mullin wanted no oart of each other. More than a bad contract the mere fact that it was long term guaranteed caused this to occur. If Sluce were 40 and could get a job in that salary range the university had some negotiating leverage. Slice has apparently made the decision to sit out 4 years and get paid, but very possibly he gets oaid AND can seek employment elsewhere
So then what was Cal talking about when he said that the school and Slice ought to resolve this? Whats to resolve? I assume if the school could get away with any kind of buy out it would do so. If I may quote Henry Hill
sounds like Slice is gonna kick back for the next 3+ years while he says to the school "Business is bad? F you, pay me!"
I thought Slice resigned.
Slice did not resign and will not resign and has an iron clad contract. There obviously are not grounds for termination so he continues to get paid. We can only hope he wants to return to coaching and finds something suitable, meaning very high paying, so that we can get out of this financial burden.
It takes two parties to agree to a contract. The folks on our side of the table need to be held accountable. If that means coming up with 400k per year it should start with the president, anyone acting as legal counsel and end with Mullin. If it is truly such a huge financial burden then the program will have a big problem ever being competitive in the Big East. If this level of incompetent management gets a pass it sends a very bad message to alums and damages endowment trust. What has been going on is almost unprecedented at any Power 6 basketball school.
I mean how is this not on Olivia? Good guy, but this just seems to be an unprofessional contract he entered into. Anyone know if we are paying an outside firm to represent us? Or are we keeping it in house?
The likelihood is the essence of the contract Slice signed has been used many times in the past, especially termination clauses. What i would expect would be different is that the severance pay for termination without cause would oay him the entire salary due him.over the remaining term. That is likely what Slice insisted on to make the move to SJU and Mullin supported that. I'm guessing in the end Slice asked out but also wouldn't resign, and instead asked to be terminated without cause. Because the personal vitriol between Mullin and Slice made the situation untenable the university only had 2 options - to terminate him without cause or to perpetuate a horrible animosity between the 2. At that point there was no turning back once Slice and Mullin wanted no oart of each other. More than a bad contract the mere fact that it was long term guaranteed caused this to occur. If Sluce were 40 and could get a job in that salary range the university had some negotiating leverage. Slice has apparently made the decision to sit out 4 years and get paid, but very possibly he gets oaid AND can seek employment elsewhere
So then what was Cal talking about when he said that the school and Slice ought to resolve this? Whats to resolve? I assume if the school could get away with any kind of buy out it would do so. If I may quote Henry Hill
sounds like Slice is gonna kick back for the next 3+ years while he says to the school "Business is bad? F you, pay me!"
I'm guessing it would be the price of the buyout. Slice is in year 2 of a 5 year contract. SJU likely would offer or has offered 1 year severance. Slice probably would easily give up 1 year to get paid in a lump sum. Artful negotiation requires skill and I expect that if both sides give a little it can be resolved. My guess, since Slice holds the cards, is SJU pays him all but 1.5 to 2 years.
I thought Slice resigned.
Slice did not resign and will not resign and has an iron clad contract. There obviously are not grounds for termination so he continues to get paid. We can only hope he wants to return to coaching and finds something suitable, meaning very high paying, so that we can get out of this financial burden.
Could we insist that he show up for work, and then reassign him to clean toilets or some other horrible job that will make him want to resign? Or fire him with cause when he refuses new assignment?
No we could not as that would be a clear case of constructive dismissal.
[/quote]Federico Mussini would thrive under Mike Rice. Malik Ellison not so much.
Parents already letting their kids play for Rice and they are even younger than college kids. Plus he would be an assistant and Mullin would be there to oversee and it seems Chris has not even raised his voice to a player in the two years he has been coaching.Not "getting" the let's hire Mike Rice movement. However knowledgeable Rice might be, is adding a former Division I HC -- and volatile one at that -- to CM's staff a good idea, especially after the ill-fated (and costly) ego-driven Mullin/Slice split. Given their personalities, seems to me that hiring Rice would be a potential disaster. And as a recruiter, no doubt his reputation would precede him. Would you want your kid to commit to a guy who's widely perceived as both both physically and psychologically abusive? I don't think so. I'm all for second chances, and I think Rice deserves one and knows the game better than most -- but would prefer that that he proves he's changed at another Division 1 program.
Not "getting" the let's hire Mike Rice movement. However knowledgeable Rice might be, is adding a former Division I HC -- and volatile one at that -- to CM's staff a good idea, especially after the ill-fated (and costly) ego-driven Mullin/Slice split. Given their personalities, seems to me that hiring Rice would be a potential disaster. And as a recruiter, no doubt his reputation would precede him. Would you want your kid to commit to a guy who's widely perceived as both both physically and psychologically abusive? I don't think so. I'm all for second chances, and I think Rice deserves one and knows the game better than most -- but would prefer that that he proves he's changed at another Division 1 program.
MY point that we recruited too many Div 2 or 3 players thus causing our many lopsided loses Our recruiting , outside of 3 players would be benches players on most BE teams Also our coaching this yr and last need much improvement for us to compete at the top of the league That may seem harsh but seems to me at this point really only Ponds is very special Marcus need still to develop his game ,Amed can become special with patience,better shot selection We were hurt it seem many games with our Guard size smaller guards defending top big guards on the def end But have to say when we were playing like a team ,creating and hitting shots we were there Freunberg is a mystery Can not figure that situation outWe still do not have good enough players to properly assess what kind of coach Chris Mullin and his staff are.
We have the worst front court in BE history. Seriously even Norm had Lamont Hamilton. Heck we could use Aaron Spears.
So let's say we do hire Rice. What makes anyone think he'll hang around for more than a year or two at the most? He's already been mentioned as a potential HC at Duquesne and Quinipiac. Don't you think he'll bolt at the first opportunity that presents itself?
Parents already letting their kids play for Rice and they are even younger than college kids. Plus he would be an assistant and Mullin would be there to oversee and it seems Chris has not even raised his voice to a player in the two years he has been coaching.Not "getting" the let's hire Mike Rice movement. However knowledgeable Rice might be, is adding a former Division I HC -- and volatile one at that -- to CM's staff a good idea, especially after the ill-fated (and costly) ego-driven Mullin/Slice split. Given their personalities, seems to me that hiring Rice would be a potential disaster. And as a recruiter, no doubt his reputation would precede him. Would you want your kid to commit to a guy who's widely perceived as both both physically and psychologically abusive? I don't think so. I'm all for second chances, and I think Rice deserves one and knows the game better than most -- but would prefer that that he proves he's changed at another Division 1 program.
Parents already letting their kids play for Rice and they are even younger than college kids. Plus he would be an assistant and Mullin would be there to oversee and it seems Chris has not even raised his voice to a player in the two years he has been coaching.Not "getting" the let's hire Mike Rice movement. However knowledgeable Rice might be, is adding a former Division I HC -- and volatile one at that -- to CM's staff a good idea, especially after the ill-fated (and costly) ego-driven Mullin/Slice split. Given their personalities, seems to me that hiring Rice would be a potential disaster. And as a recruiter, no doubt his reputation would precede him. Would you want your kid to commit to a guy who's widely perceived as both both physically and psychologically abusive? I don't think so. I'm all for second chances, and I think Rice deserves one and knows the game better than most -- but would prefer that that he proves he's changed at another Division 1 program.
What gets lost in all the shuffle with the Rice stint at Rutgers is the lack of complaints by the players who played for him, the ones who who were supposedly "abused." I won't discuss opinions on this because I perfectly well understand his behavior is totally unacceptable in today's world. I am not sure that makes for a better world though. Life's best lessons are learned by dealing with adversity and understanding life isn't fair or always easy. However, I come from a completely different generation, one where you stood your ground and fought, not run to "Mommy".