[quote="SJU85" post=322002][quote="Adam" post=321952][quote="SJU85" post=321949][quote="Adam" post=321943]Not sure if this has been brought up, but I was annoyed even before the game started that Heron's injury wasn't disclosed prior. The reason being is it gave us all the "here we go again" demotivating feeling right as we were getting into our seats. It also probably energized Providence... talk about a nice last second surprise.
Maybe I'm overthinking this, and I can only speak for myself as a fan. Had I known a day or two prior that he was questionable, I would've been pissed off for a few hours then gotten over it before the game started. Instead, I was just sitting there watching the line drop in real time. Because of the way the news was delivered, I was pissed right from the start.
Anyways... hope Heron is back tomorrow. Just don't like how this was handled.[/quote]
And you wouldn't have had that "here we go again" demotivating feeling if it had been announced Thursday or Friday? If I was a betting man (and I'm not), I think must would and this thread and the "here we go again" feeling would have just happened days before and still carried right into the game.
He got dressed and tried it prior to the "official" warm-ups and it was no good. Then the news came out so it was basically a game time decision. Let's move on.[/quote]
Yes I would've had that same feeling, but a day before rather than minutes before. Most humans respond the same way after hearing bad news. Their first response is denial/anger/defeat and then gradually they get over it and accept it with a sense of optimism for the future. It was a gut punch literally minutes before the game started, and rather than thinking "hey, we're favored by 5 points so we should still win" my thought was "boo, the line keeps dropping". It's all psychology, but a lot of the game is mental and all humans take time to get over news. Of course, had we won none of this would matter but we didn't.
Again, just my personal thought but I think it was a bad decision by the staff. I hope in the future they learn from it, because obviously it didn't help anybody on our side and arguably gave Providence some last minute momentum.[/quote]
On the scale of bad news, this doesn’t even register on the meter, I mean yes your number two scorer is not playing today is disappointing but...
Lines mean nothing unless you’re betting. As far as knowing earlier, knowing what exactly? That he is battling tendinitis or a bruised knee and he is day to day? Would that had stopped you from going to the game or watching it? Would it make you cheer or support the team differently? Would it have made your preparation for the game differently?
What is it the staff and the medical team supposed to have learned exactly?[/quote]
Not bad news? We looked awful and lost by 14. The only news worse would've been Ponds being out or an extended injury. Obviously I am talking about bad news in relation to the game, not actual bad news outside of sports.
Lines do mean something... they are our odds on winning and they kept going down. I mean that more in a figurative momentum shifting way. It was a gut punch last second momentum killer for us and helper for Providence.
I still would have went no matter what, but others may not have knowing how we've played without our full team. It just felt like a scummy move by the staff, almost as if they wanted the maximum attendance so they hid this from everyone until minutes before the game. Perhaps their intention was to throw Providence off last minute, but that didn't work and if anything it gave them momentum at the worst time possible.
Anyways, think whatever you want but the results speak for themselves. I'm not saying hiding his injury until the last second was definitely why we lost, but at best it certainly didn't help.