Florida Gulf Coast

I keep searching for our breakout performance where we are clicking on all cylinders keeping our opponents 3 pt % below 35%

Only one team has shot over 35% from 3-point range against us.

Oh petty facts

While acknowledging the import of aggregate percentages, there is no getting around that the volume of unbelievably open threes allowed and made vs. Detroit, Murray St., and Baylor are a problem...whether they shot it at 30% or 40%. When you're giving up an average of double-digit 3s (as we did in those 3 games), the difference in the percentage clip made against us becomes negligible in comparison to the sheer volume made against us (within a reasonable percentage). Out of our zone, when assignments aren't tight and we are constantly scrambling to get to shooters that also contributes to our other big issue thus far, which is controlling the defensive backboard.

We were better in both areas against Holy Cross, and both will continue to get better. But there is little covering up - by way of percentage or otherwise - the way we defended the 3 and rebounded in Charleston.

BTW, MJ, realize you were simply responding to Joe3's post with facts based on the percentage he raised. Didn't mean to imply you were defending our 3 pt defense. Just used it as an opportunity to make a point I had been thinking about with respect to 3pt% in comparison to 3pters made against us this season. Seems like we've been holding teams to a good %, but the volume made has been a real issue.

No problem. It's cool!

When teams are launching 30 3's per contest, and have multiple guys who can hit 'em, then they are more than likely gonna hit their share.

Rebounding is my main focus. Extra possessions are a killer. That is when teams can burn you for treys, as everybody is scrambling around.

I remember feeling confident going into games knowing we would pound teams on the boards during the '97-'98 and '98-'99 seasons, respectively. Those extra possessions are a huge bonus. We have to do better on the glass (particularly, the defensive end).

I do think we need one of Gift or Sanchez to do what we want to this year, because of the defensive backboard issue. A lot of jumpers and competitors in Jakaar, Amir, Pointer, Jones, but only one true post in Obekpa. I know Sanchez isn't really that kind of player, but just adding another jumper/competitor will assist. Obviously Gift is that type of player, should we go that route. Obviously the other part of it ties back into the overall defense, picking up box out assignments out of the zone. This holds true whether we add Gift/Sanchez or not.

This is why I believe we have to play Gift, if Sanchez isn't eligible by mid-to-late December. I feel we're gonna need his beef and girth. This is story for another day.

I saw Gift being very involved by screaming out assignments (especially, to Obekpa) during our game versus Murray State (as, I was only sittng two rows behind the bench). I was impressed. Imagine that leadership on the floor.

Regardless, we're gonna need either him or Sanchez in another month or so, IMO. Let's put together a sound performance tonight, and get a resounding win.

Could not agree more. Seems that the logic in red-shirting gift as a Senior would be a crowded frontcourt. That frontcourt is less crowded without a likely 25+ MPG guy in Sanchez, so if he's not eligible the reason for redshirting Gift in the first place is no longer in play. The coaching staff doesn't need me to recognize this for them, so I'm assuming we'll be seeing one of them before Big East play. Our ceiling becomes that much higher with just one of them, no reason to deprive ourselves voluntarily.

Coach mentioned Gift's leadership - especially with the frontcourt players - in the Holy Cross pregame presser. I agree that would be a beneficial addition.
 
I keep searching for our breakout performance where we are clicking on all cylinders keeping our opponents 3 pt % below 35%

Only one team has shot over 35% from 3-point range against us.

Oh petty facts

While acknowledging the import of aggregate percentages, there is no getting around that the volume of unbelievably open threes allowed and made vs. Detroit, Murray St., and Baylor are a problem...whether they shot it at 30% or 40%. When you're giving up an average of double-digit 3s (as we did in those 3 games), the difference in the percentage clip made against us becomes negligible in comparison to the sheer volume made against us (within a reasonable percentage). Out of our zone, when assignments aren't tight and we are constantly scrambling to get to shooters that also contributes to our other big issue thus far, which is controlling the defensive backboard.

We were better in both areas against Holy Cross, and both will continue to get better. But there is little covering up - by way of percentage or otherwise - the way we defended the 3 and rebounded in Charleston.

BTW, MJ, realize you were simply responding to Joe3's post with facts based on the percentage he raised. Didn't mean to imply you were defending our 3 pt defense. Just used it as an opportunity to make a point I had been thinking about with respect to 3pt% in comparison to 3pters made against us this season. Seems like we've been holding teams to a good %, but the volume made has been a real issue.

No problem. It's cool!

When teams are launching 30 3's per contest, and have multiple guys who can hit 'em, then they are more than likely gonna hit their share.

Rebounding is my main focus. Extra possessions are a killer. That is when teams can burn you for treys, as everybody is scrambling around.

I remember feeling confident going into games knowing we would pound teams on the boards during the '97-'98 and '98-'99 seasons, respectively. Those extra possessions are a huge bonus. We have to do better on the glass (particularly, the defensive end).

I do think we need one of Gift or Sanchez to do what we want to this year, because of the defensive backboard issue. A lot of jumpers and competitors in Jakaar, Amir, Pointer, Jones, but only one true post in Obekpa. I know Sanchez isn't really that kind of player, but just adding another jumper/competitor will assist. Obviously Gift is that type of player, should we go that route. Obviously the other part of it ties back into the overall defense, picking up box out assignments out of the zone. This holds true whether we add Gift/Sanchez or not.

This is why I believe we have to play Gift, if Sanchez isn't eligible by mid-to-late December. I feel we're gonna need his beef and girth. This is story for another day.

I saw Gift being very involved by screaming out assignments (especially, to Obekpa) during our game versus Murray State (as, I was only sittng two rows behind the bench). I was impressed. Imagine that leadership on the floor.

Regardless, we're gonna need either him or Sanchez in another month or so, IMO. Let's put together a sound performance tonight, and get a resounding win.

Could not agree more. Seems that the logic in red-shirting gift as a Senior would be a crowded frontcourt. That frontcourt is less crowded without a likely 25+ MPG guy in Sanchez, so if he's not eligible the reason for redshirting Gift in the first place is no longer in play. The coaching staff doesn't need me to recognize this for them, so I'm assuming we'll be seeing one of them before Big East play. Our ceiling becomes that much higher with just one of them, no reason to deprive ourselves voluntarily.

Coach mentioned Gift's leadership - especially with the frontcourt players - in the Holy Cross pregame presser. I agree that would be a beneficial addition.

To me the logic is, does the staff think a 5th year senior big in 2014 will have more impact on the season than a 4th year Senior big would have here in 2013. And it seems pretty obvious what the staff thinks.
 
Jesus Christ here we go again...a mid major up 10-2 right away nailing every 3 as if they are Duke

Just one game can we dominate?
 
Marco finally with his first 3...jeez it's about time. Harrison is rusty...bad sign. Felix still very solid.
 
Beginning to think that this SJ team just cannot shut a team down in the first half. No matter who they are. Wow. The opponents make it look easy against us in the first half.
 
This game is slipping away fast...Sampson and Felix hurt already and we can't shoot for crap. Refs better pay close attention to FCG because they are playing rough.
 
This is going to be the game we lose. Laid an absolute egg so far. Terrible shooting, terrible defense, terrible rebounding, D'Lo a non factor, etc. What a joke. This SJ team cannot put away low mid majors and it's very scary. We are a mess.
 
Rebounding tonight hasn't been about size its been about want. When the ball goes up no one boxes out & and they all watch like they're waiting for someone to get it. Sometimes I think they are too urgent to outlet rather then getting the ball. Defensive possessions dont end until the rebound is secured. Terrible habbit that needs to be broken.
 
Thank god we made up that gap...the way we are playing I'll take being tied at half anyday. With that being said, I don't get it...I really don't so can someone clear this up for me? WHY are our opponents rebounding juggernauts? Or to put it another way, why are we so terrible? Athleticism is our thing, not FGCU's thing. We should be feasting on boards. If Harrison doesn't get going in the 2nd half and we don't start getting stops on D, this game is the one I pick that we drop in the cupcake OOC matchups. Hope to god I'm wrong but we have never even led.
 
Back
Top