I have been told by St.John's students that Harrington rarely mixes with students and avoids student activities.
While other Catholic colleges and Universities have raised their academic image over the past 25 years St. john's academic image has at best remained stagnet. Harrington has seemingly set low goals for academic recognition and has sometimes failed to meet even his low goals.
Harrington has embarrassed himself and St. John's University.
In fairness, arguably 2 of the biggest factors that act as a drag in our U.S. News ranking are: Retention (now a tad under 80%) and 6 yr. graduation rate.
Since a very healthy percent of students are Pell Grant eligible, a fair number find they don't have the money to continue their St. John's education at some point after they matriculate at the university.
If St. John's had sufficient grants and/or scholarships to keep these young men and women in school our rankings would rise and rise dramatically, by definition.
That is why it is so important that we, as alumni, contribute to the annual fund and capital campaigns.
Right now, I believe, alumni contributions are about 14% (give or take).
Years ago (mid-70's) our competition was Fordham, BC and/or Villanova.
Fast forward 40 years and it's arguably a school like SUNY Stony Brook because of the cost of the education.
As I mentioned before, and this is no news bulletin to any of us by any stretch, we have a very large freshman class.
Our top kids could be admitted to a higher ranked private school if they could afford to go away.
For the bottom third, it may be problematic.
SAT scores, now around 1100 (sans writing section), are where they were 40 yrs. ago.
HOWEVER, the size of the freshman class today is TWICE as large.
I think we all agree that the programs on the College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions are solid and enhance the reputation of the university, for example.
Others can add programs of choice, such as Accounting and Education, that are also well regarded.
Do some programs need work? Sure they do as we are only going to be as strong as our weakest link. Those programs and their shortcomings obviously need to be addressed.