[quote="R Dry" post=377997]I can't believe people already are talking about CMA leaving or trying to find someone else. Let's not forget, it's not like people were jumping to hire him. But with that said, I think he has done a great job of creating a culture and getting his players to play hard. I would challenge anyone in their first year on a job as a leader to come in change the culture and become winner with limited talent. How quickly we forget our last TWO coaches who did not seem to have a offensive or defensive system, and a recruiting plan that revolved around signing "shinny" toys that did not mesh well. I think we all need to wait until CMA has his own players and then talk about it in three years. People are so quick to want to see results, instead of giving it time and seeing the process play out.[/quote]
So, divide this board into different piles. Here is my view and certainly others may differ greatly.
As I have stated before, one group makes up their mind before the season what we are and regardless of the games, stick to that position, damn what the games reveal. Their mantra, by and large, we have no talent and so we should be losing regardless of how we lose. So everything will be fine because Cole or Alexander or whoever will be able to assume the ‘closer/hero” role when we abandon the game we played for the first 37 minutes.
A second is a group satisfied, at least for now, with what we are because we play hard, important change MA has instilled, no question, but IMO pretty low bar.
A third group is where I would put myself, posters looking at game performance and offering thoughts and opinions as we see it. Speaking for myself, that DOES NOT make me right, but any discussions regarding basketball are pretty much squashed by the “no talent” or “we play hard” groups. There is a fair amount of criticism from his earlier stops of Anderson as a coach, some of which I am seeing here. Does that mean I want him replaced, hell no. Does that mean I am sorry he was hired, hell no. He has done an overall fantastic job. Part of my “up on a pedestal” posting is directed at the posters who have stayed married to the “no talent” nonsense when it is obvious to me that our talent is plenty good enough to get leads playing one way but then seemingly means we have to play completely differently in the end game. But to summarize here, IMO Anderson was a great hire, still think that but that doesn’t mean I feel he is perfect or beyond criticism.
The fourth group are ones who think Anderson should go and I have already wasted too much energy just typing this much about those knuckleheads and their agendas.