...Can we make the Tournament?

Paultzman" post=420525 said:
Anthony Mattia" post=420524 said:
Paultzman" post=420518 said:
Yup

The Big East could have 4 teams on the bubble (Seton Hall, UConn, Xavier, St John's). Should any of these teams lose to Depaul/Gtown/Butler/Marq, there's a sizeable chance it's the nail in the coffin for their NCAA hopes.

Why put your bubble teams at risk when you don't have to?

@Brad_Wachtel


 
We've lost to 3 of those teams


He means remaining games w those teams

 
Sorry, sarcastic joke.  Should have put a /media/kunena/emoticons/silly.png in there
 
Bubble teams have made some moves... as of today we are only on 1 bracket on bracketmatrix.com. I think scheduling another team would be a good idea, but it NEEDS to be a Q1 or Q2 game. Right now we just need to keep winning (obviously) and also need more solid opportunities.
 
Last edited:
Adam" post=420543 said:
Bubble teams have made some moves... as of today we are only on 1 bracket on bracketmatrix.com. I think scheduling another team would be a good idea, but it NEEDS to be a Q1 ot Q2 game. Right now we just need to keep winning (obviously) and also more solid opportunities.
Does Rutgers need a game ?
 
Unfortunately our free spot doesn't work out with Rutgers, but I did read on Twitter there are a few possibilities. I think Syracuse, Notre Dame, and a couple others.
 
Paultzman" post=420518 said:
Yup

The Big East could have 4 teams on the bubble (Seton Hall, UConn, Xavier, St John's). Should any of these teams lose to Depaul/Gtown/Butler/Marq, there's a sizeable chance it's the nail in the coffin for their NCAA hopes.

Why put your bubble teams at risk when you don't have to?

@Brad_Wachtel






(I still haven't figured out this quoting system lol...)

What is Brad implying? That we should cancel our games against teams like DePaul? That the Big East Tournament field should be reduced? Is any of that plausible? I haven't heard of other conferences doing something like that.
 
Last edited:
Adam" post=420549 said:
Paultzman" post=420518 said:
Yup

The Big East could have 4 teams on the bubble (Seton Hall, UConn, Xavier, St John's). Should any of these teams lose to Depaul/Gtown/Butler/Marq, there's a sizeable chance it's the nail in the coffin for their NCAA hopes.

Why put your bubble teams at risk when you don't have to?

@Brad_Wachtel






(I still haven't figured out this quoting system lol...)

What is Brad implying? That we should cancel our games against teams like DePaul? That the Big East Tournament field should be reduced? Is any of that plausible? I haven't heard of other conferences doing something like that.
Sounds like he's implying pulling a UConn... which means come up with some covid releated excuse to pause in order to skip certain games you don't wanna play at the time.  Then pick and choose which one's you want to make up based on your team's situation when you return. 

I'm still mad that St. John's had to go on the road to play UConn, but UConn doesn't have to return the home game to St.John's, when there's been plenty of time to make it up and St.John's has been more than willing to play the game. UConn simply said, that game is of no benefit to them, they'll give Villanova their return game because it helps them if they win, but the St.John's game can only hurt them so it's a no for them.  I said in another thread I really hope the committe rewards the teams that played more games and tried to reschedule as many games as they could.  There's teams on the bubble now that are going to end up with less than 20 games total, and most of them aren't trying to reschedule or add more games.  It's easier to avoid bad losses if you don't have to play them.
 
Making Plays - what's funny too is that St. John's would be a Q1 game for UConn (top 70 away game), but they'd only be a Q2 for us. Honestly, I think they just don't want to get swept in their first season back. If we were in the Midwest I'm pretty sure they'd schedule us.

I can't wait until next year when we don't need to worry about any of this nonsense again.
 
Adam" post=420560 said:
Making Plays - what's funny too is that St. John's would be a Q1 game for UConn (top 70 away game), but they'd only be a Q2 for us. Honestly, I think they just don't want to get swept in their first season back. If we were in the Midwest I'm pretty sure they'd schedule us.

I can't wait until next year when we don't need to worry about any of this nonsense again.
I forgot who posted this in another thread (think it was Paultz), but it was a tweet from a UConn media member that basically said UConn was willing to reschedule their home game against Villonva because it would for sure be a Q1 home game for them, but they weren't interested in scheduling any more road games that they weren't sure would be a Q1 game.  Basically saying, they weren't sure St.John's would end up being a Q1 game, which they have a point it's close to the borderline and 1 slip could knock the NET back outside the top 75. And with Villanova barring a massive collapse they will have a top 30 NET.  

With that said, regardless if it's a Q1 or Q2 for them, it's straight BS that they can decide which one's they want to make up.  That's unfair.  CMA could have easily told Leito that they weren't going to make up the DePaul game, because it's all risk with no reward.
 
mm52" post=420497 said:
Subject to all other teams' schedules Rutgers or Bonaventure are logical choices.  Or Drake from the MVC?  Or staying in Philly after Nova, Temple?
===

I would reach out to Siena College which is an easy 2+ hour drive down the NYS Thruway,

Playing StJ's t is a can't lose for Siena,    Currently Siena is in 1st place in the MAAC.  The MAAC is a one bid league.  If Siena holds on and wins the MAAC Tournament then it would be a #15 seed in the NCAA Tournament whether it does not play StJ's or if it loses to StJ's.  If however in the unlikely chance Siena was to defeat StJ's then it could move up to a higher seed in the tournament..  

 
 
St. Louis, a fellow bubble team most bracketologists have a couple of spots ahead of us just got run out of the gym by a mediocre Dayton team.
 
Siena is ranked #114. I'd like to see either a home game vs a top 60 or an away game vs a top 90. Going outside the top 100 range, especially at home, would be like playing a Butler again (but worse since it'd be at home). 
 
Adam" post=420586 said:
Siena is ranked #114. I'd like to see either a home game vs a top 60 or an away game vs a top 90. Going outside the top 100 range, especially at home, would be like playing a Butler again (but worse since it'd be at home). 
iI like your Cuse idea. At home of course :)
 
Maryland or Syracuse would be good wins for us and could possibly work schedule wise (would be tight) but not sure they would see it in their interest. I'll be mildly surprised if we wind up adding a game at this point.
 
Forget Syracuse.

I am told that after StJ's defeated the University of Syracuse three consecutive seasons 2014, 2015, and 2016 that Boeheim has refused to schedule StJohn's.  

So no, you should not hold your breath hoping that Syracuse will agree to travel to Carnesecca to play a last minute game against  StJ's.

.
 
Last edited:
If I was CMA I'd wait until after the Villanova game to make a decision on adding another game.  You beat DePaul and you steal a game at Villanova, they'll be safely in the field.  And for the type of game they'd be able to add, which will probably be a Q2 game at best, it would be more risk than reward at that point.

Adding a game IMO would only make sense if they lose to Villanova, just beating DePaul won't move the needle at all, beating Providence (if other bubble teams ahead of us lose) would probably move the needle a little bit, maybe 1 or 2 spots, beating Seton Hall would put them in the last 4 in or close to the last 4 byes, so another Q2 game in that situation would help move that needle a little bit and possibly allow for an 0-1 in BE tournament apperance and they still make the tournament.
 
CMA strikes me as the kind of guy who wouldn't shy away from playing another bubble team even if it potentially hurt their chances with a loss. Us fans on the other hand :) 
 
Back
Top