Love this coach! He does it the right way. If I was a younger man, I'd name my next child Anderson!Paultzman" post=424316 said:https://twitter.com/iron_mikema/status/1368984857993478149?s=21
Tie w Juliangman" post=424327 said:Is there more than 1 most improved? Xavier saying Zach Freemantle won most improved.
Porgyman" post=424323 said:Love this coach! He does it the right way. If I was a younger man, I'd name my next child Anderson!
Lol! Our elusive big man! AC Porgyman!lawmanfan" post=42433 said:
Anderson Porgyman is kind of a lot of letters. But you could go for the multisyllabic trifecta by making it Anderson Carnesecca Porgyman if you were so inclined.
Cooley has done it also.L J S A" post=424184 said:Ah, the old John Thompson move.SJU85" post=424070 said:Or since he can't vote for his own player, vote for a player who has no business even being in the conversation instead of a player who should be to give his player that is in the conversation a better chance of winning.
I completely agree. But I can see the rationale for someone voting for Hurley is that he was able to bring his UConn team to a higher-rated conference and found success there.... Such BS if CMA doesn't win it.lawmanfan" post=424317 said:If Hurley gets COY over Anderson it's an absolute joke.
Hurley took a preseason top-3-in-the-league team and finished - third.
Anderson took a pre-season 9th place team and finished fourth.
It isn't even a close question.
Knight" post=424418 said:Coaches votes should be made public.
Not a bad idea Knight, omly problem is that it could cause some friction between coaches, and anger amongst players and fans towards coaches who didn't vote the way the they would have liked
True, Monte. But aren't Hall of Fame votes made public, at least for Baseball? And yes, the one writer who did not vote for Jeter to be inducted did get some blowback.Monte" post=424434 said:Knight" post=424418 said:Coaches votes should be made public.
Not a bad idea Knight, omly problem is that it could cause some friction between coaches, and anger amongst players and fans towards coaches who didn't vote the way the they would have liked
Tonyinfairfield " post=424436 said:True, Monte. But aren't Hall of Fame votes made public, at least for Baseball? And yes, the one writer who did not vote for Jeter to be inducted did get some blowback.Monte" post=424434 said:Knight" post=424418 said:Coaches votes should be made public.
Not a bad idea Knight, omly problem is that it could cause some friction between coaches, and anger amongst players and fans towards coaches who didn't vote the way the they would have liked
I believe the voter has to agree to have his vote made public. They never publisized the name of the person who did not vote for Jeter.
My bad. Then who was the sportwriter who agreed to be interviewed by Steve Somers on his show and when Somers introduced him, Somers made a comment about the guy being the only one who voted against a hall of fame candidate and then the sportswriter immediately said he would not appear on Somers' show? I think it happened a few years ago and for the life of me, I cannot remember the vote that was in question.Ron" post=424438 said:Tonyinfairfield " post=424436 said:True, Monte. But aren't Hall of Fame votes made public, at least for Baseball? And yes, the one writer who did not vote for Jeter to be inducted did get some blowback.Monte" post=424434 said:Knight" post=424418 said:Coaches votes should be made public.
Not a bad idea Knight, omly problem is that it could cause some friction between coaches, and anger amongst players and fans towards coaches who didn't vote the way the they would have liked
I believe the voter has to agree to have his vote made public. They never publisized the name of the person who did not vote for Jeter.