Big East Awards Predictions
- Thread starter MakingPlays
- Start date
indyredmen97
Member
Mike Anderson is the best thing to happen to us since we created our new conference and got the Fox TV money. I'm bemused by our fans that don't realize the incredible luck we fell into when we hired him, he is the best leader of men we've had since Louey C. As lawmanfan perfectly outlined earlier, his work this year is undeniable. I would only add that his recruiting suffers from not wanting men who don't want to do the work it takes to make a team. I never worry about the team being gassed late in games (which I hated with my favorite alum/coach). Or mailing in road games, being selfish, etc. If you support St. John's and don't love Coach Anderson, I feel some empathy, this gentleman gives you a basketball team that makes me proud to support this program
Last edited:
Congratulations to Coach and Posh! Champ had a great season and most improved player and First Team Big East as a sophomore are great honors. There is a very important game to be played tommorrow and ones hopefully on Friday and Saturday. Lets go out and show everyone what we are made of.
Yeah. If Bouknight had missed half the games he did, he's likely a unanious selection as POY. But you have to play. Otherwise its a beauty pagent.lawmanfan" post=424636 said:
As for COY you can make a reasonable case for both, but CMA did a few things Hurley didn't. He out performed the preseaon coaches poll by +5 spots (+1 for Hurley), and he won the head to head matchup on their court.
I guess some of them want to point to the Depaul loss as the reason Hurley should get it but that's highly selective. It discounts the facts that we won at Uconn, and beat Nova.
The fact that anyone questions Iron Mike’s selection is a tribute, albeit unintended, to him. It means our roster is no longer viewed as being inferior which is attributable, in large part, to his player developmentMonte" post=424634 said:
The fact that anyone questions Iron Mike’s selection is a tribute, albeit unintended, to him. It means our roster is no longer viewed as being inferior which is attributable, in large part, to his player developmentMonte" post=424634 said:
The fact that anyone questions Iron Mike’s selection is a tribute, albeit unintended, to him. It means our roster is no longer viewed as being inferior which is attributable, in large part, to his player developmentMonte" post=424634 said:
The fact that anyone questions Iron Mike’s selection is a tribute, albeit unintended, to him. It means our roster is no longer viewed as being inferior which is attributable, in large part, to his player developmentMonte" post=424634 said:
The fact that anyone questions Iron Mike’s selection is a tribute, albeit unintended, to him. It means our roster is no longer viewed as being inferior which is attributable, in large part, to his player developmentMonte" post=424634 said:
