Around the Big East

Of course you ignore my point entirely. Another person who could use a reading course. I never said it wasn’t a foul. I said it shouldn’t have been called, just like Singleton’s was a technical that never should have been called.
All fouls should be called . Dont see the comparison with Singleton which wasn’t a foul to begin with , which is why he got the technical when he’d protested .
 
To put Carino tv viewers number in perspective, it was dwarfed by the 14.2 million who watched Iowa-Conn. There are some cooking shows that draw more viewers than the NIT. How did the school make out? Last time I looked the NIT paid invites $ 4000 per game. I know SH is desperate for money. But really? This counts as a slam dunk? Carino has a personal dislike for Pitino. That’s fine. But Carino should at least be honest and consistent. He recently attacked Pitino for turning down NIT. But has never said a word about all the other well known and respected coaches who did the same thing. NC did it last year as well. But Carino had no problem with them. It’s reporting like this that gives the media its bad image.
It’s because he’s a shill for the Hall. He is literally the only person who covers them and gives them ink in a market where no one cares about what they do. So he gets great access in exchange for carrying the water.
 
All fouls should be called . Dont see the comparison with Singleton which wasn’t a foul to begin with , which is why he got the technical when he’d protested .
So all fouls that satisfy you should be called but different rules if you don’t think it’s a foul? RIGHT, like I said, hypocrites.. and answer if you like but I am done with the subject…
 
Sadly, I think Uconn is 3peating. They will reload and do this again. They are on a different level than everyone else with Hurly at the helm.
Does UCONN have a super top-shelf NIL budget, on par with the Kentuckys / Dukes / UNCs of the world? (I presume those schools have the most).
 
Back
Top