[quote="Logen" post=314997][quote="Monte" post=314995][quote="ron " post=314994][quote="Class of 72" post=314989][quote="ron " post=314974]Syracuse by 4 over Duke at Cameron! Check out how many minutes the starters played for both teams. We should be able to do the same thing![/quote]
LMAO!
Just ask Jimmy B to coach that one game for us?[/quote]
The point I am trying to make is that players from both teams had no problem playing big minutes:
Duke: White-42, Barrett-45, Williamson-44, Bolden-34, O'connell-34
Syracuse: Hughes-45, Briseett-43, Battle-45, Howard-32, Chukwu-32[/quote]
Big minutes, the refs, etc are excuses for when we lose. When we win, none of that matters.[/quote]
Actually not excuses, opportunities for Mullin/staff bashing. The expectations unrealistic when we were undefeated, criticism nonsensical now that we are not. Staff is far from perfect, far, but the minutes, geez, evidently our players get exhausted only when we lose. While playing pretty much the same minutes as other teams, we just can’t handle the work load, but again, only when we lose. The lack of bench, well not many teams go 9-10 deep and we might have had a stronger bench had Keita not got hurt, remember he was starting and Figueroa was coming off the bench to start the season. Dixon leaving hurt, Keita getting hurt after sitting out a year was a setback. With Trimble as an 8th man not a horrible rotation. It did not work out, shit happens. Building a program is tough and not linear, for those interested look at the records of Wright and Willard, it took time and much criticism for both. Not saying Mullin will succeed, there are certainly things about the coaching I don’t like but there is already enough bashing here.[/quote]
Opportunities for bashing? Trust me, no one is seeking "opportunity" to criticize staff or the program. If you don't think criticism is warranted at this juncture in year 4 with a full roster of very experienced 4 and 5 star players in a much more winnable Big East, then you've made it clear you likely will never think criticism is warranted. We just lost to DePaul at home shortly after being ranked #24. Nova was understandable...but not DePaul at home even without Ponds we should've found a way. This is the point things went off the rails last year after a starting guard went down, we went into a nosedive. Despite the impressive OOC performance, this program has not even shown the ability to compete seriously in conference play all 4 years thus far. OOC were cupcakes...the Big East is the real test and we are 2-3. If this is a different SJ team they will turn it around immediately and rally around Ponds being out.