Room112 post=450734 said:
I honestly don't even know how anyone can debate if Anderson is the guy. If anyone wants to direct their anger anywhere, it should be at the school, administration and board who allowed this once legendary basketball team to fall into such mediocrity with their mom and pop approach.
By all indications, Mike Anderson is working hard and doing the best he possibly can. What more can you realistically ask? Do I need to remind everyone that nobody wanted this job during the last coaching search? Do we need to list all of the reasons again as to why it isn't a desirable job?
I'm not happy with the results this year either, but I'm certainly not blaming Anderson.
Some schools have had time pass them by.
Do you know that Looie had a deal never to be paid more than the university president? I think his maximum salary was $125k per year. When he left to coach the Nets, his replacement, Frank Mulzoff was paid what experienced faculty made, $17,500 per year.
Just 15 years prior, st John's single handedly jumpstarted the ACC, by refusing a $2,000 raise to Frank McGuire from about $5,000 per year.
In the beginning post Looie we paid a competitive salary to Mahoney given his lack of experience 400k.
Two coaches later SJU doubled that to bring in GW's ( and Patrick Ewings hs coach) mike Jarvis.
Since Lavin we've paid big salaries but over that long stretch ignored everything else.
Shanley is the first president who appears to have a handle on what it takes, cragg the first AD since Manetta.
I guarantee you though, if fans don't ante up, we will never be a competitive program on an equal footing with top programs.