I don't care about Rutgers. I care about the implications from them leaving for other teams. There needs to be a complete re-do on conferences. Set it up like a draft. The conferences pick a certain number of teams, and then the conferences lock for 10 yrs. The constant shuffling is terrible for the NCAA and destroys rivalry, tradition, and name brand.
I totally agree w your last sentence. Its also forcing conferences to be georaphical messes.
To state the obvious this is all about $$$$$. No news bulletin there.
How is that for a mastery of the understatement !!!!!!!!
None of these schools care about long standing rivalries.
All that you need to do is look south....to the state of Texas. In that state, kids grow up loving either the Horns or the Aggies. It's more than a rivalry, it's a true religious experience.
When A&M was willing to walk away from this rivalry....and head to the SEC, it put everything in perspective. It is now, and will always be...all about the $$$$$'s.
It's not destroying the brand of those schools that have bolted to the ACC or those who potentially will bolt to the ACC and The Big 10.
It does hurt the schools left holding the bag, as was pointed out.
Without a marketable football program, a school has zero leverage.
The ACC, Big 10 and every other major conference only cares about their own self interest.
They could care less about the impact their moves have on anyone else.
It's every man for himself !