So two weeks ago Duke loses to unranked Clemson and falls from #2 to #3. SJU beats Creighton #23 and loses by two on the road without Smith and falls from #9 to #10. Makes sense ??
Clemson is a top 20 team. Nova a top 50?
So two weeks ago Duke loses to unranked Clemson and falls from #2 to #3. SJU beats Creighton #23 and loses by two on the road without Smith and falls from #9 to #10. Makes sense ??
It is also based on what the teams below and above you in the polls that week.So two weeks ago Duke loses to unranked Clemson and falls from #2 to #3. SJU beats Creighton #23 and loses by two on the road without Smith and falls from #9 to #10. Makes sense ??
Absolutely it is. I have no problem with where we’re ranked.It is also based on what the teams below and above you in the polls that week.
To add, losing to Clemson is a much better lost than losing to Nova.
He has Marquette ahead of us. Clearly a guy who doesn't pay attentionAdam Lichtenstein???? Who is this joker!!!??
Someone needs to go down there and give’em a fresh one!!!!!He has Marquette ahead of us. Clearly a guy who doesn't pay attention
Former Tuba champion from SwitzerlandAdam Lichtenstein???? Who is this joker!!!??
Well, he does sound like a blow hard.Former Tuba champion from Switzerland
Yes. All of our losses have been Q1.Pretty incredible that this team has avoided any bad losses to date. Last night during the game they showed a graphic with St John's resume, and listed the loss @ Villanova as a bad loss. Wasn't that a Quad 1 game??
Another example of anti-Big East bias.Pretty incredible that this team has avoided any bad losses to date. Last night during the game they showed a graphic with St John's resume, and listed the loss @ Villanova as a bad loss. Wasn't that a Quad 1 game??