2024-2025 Schedule

NBA schedule to be revealed on Thursday at 3pm.

After that, the Big East can get started on the conference slate.

It must be one heck of a nightmare drawing the Big East schedule around the competing dates with MSG, Wells Fargo, Amica Mutual Pavilion, Capital One Arena, and other off campus arenas.
 
It must be one heck of a nightmare drawing the Big East schedule around the competing dates with MSG, Wells Fargo, Amica Mutual Pavilion, Capital One Arena, and other off campus arenas.
It's why the Big East has tradionally been the last major conference to reveal their schedule, although in recent years, most of the conferences have done them at around the same time. I guess the TV moguls want to wait now, too.
 
NBA schedule out.

Of note:
Dec 7th: Knicks play Pistons at MSG at 7:30 PM.

Hopefully 12pm start for us is in store...
 
NBA schedule out.

Of note:
Dec 7th: Knicks play Pistons at MSG at 7:30 PM.

Hopefully 12pm start for us is in store...
And, they have a 7 pm game at MSG against the Nets on 11/17, so the New Mexico game will be in the afternoon, as well.
 
I love an afternoon tip
I don't. Not at noon, anyway. I'm just not a morning person, in general. 4:00 would be ideal, for me.

I do hope the K-State game is at noon though, since I have a family obligation that night (which of course, I will miss for the game, if it were at night). That's probably the only way you'll ever see me push for a 12:00 start.
 
I may have missed it, but I thought there would be a focus during the off-season of various conferences, schools and even journalists putting pressure on the NCAA to reveal how/what metrics are used in determining what schools have earned a bid to the NCAA Tournament? Has there been any such disclosure/discussion(s)? Without any light on the issue (especially after the Selection Committee badly botched the selection of schools this past year), how are schools/ADs/coaches supposed to schedule games?! For example, should a school schedule most of their OOC schedule against low-majors and try to beat them by 50. Or, alternatively, should schools front-load their schedule by trying to schedule their first 10 or so games against high-majors, even though it may result in a .500 (or worse) record after ten-games?!? The lack of transparency is appalling, especially for a scholastic organization whose mission is supposedly to better the lives of student athletes.
 
I may have missed it, but I thought there would be a focus during the off-season of various conferences, schools and even journalists putting pressure on the NCAA to reveal how/what metrics are used in determining what schools have earned a bid to the NCAA Tournament? Has there been any such disclosure/discussion(s)? Without any light on the issue (especially after the Selection Committee badly botched the selection of schools this past year), how are schools/ADs/coaches supposed to schedule games?! For example, should a school schedule most of their OOC schedule against low-majors and try to beat them by 50. Or, alternatively, should schools front-load their schedule by trying to schedule their first 10 or so games against high-majors, even though it may result in a .500 (or worse) record after ten-games?!? The lack of transparency is appalling, especially for a scholastic organization whose mission is supposedly to better the lives of student athletes.
NCAA does not want transparency. Then it could be held to account. With amorphous, ever changing standards, it can favor power five football schools. This is not hard to understand. Pitino called every committee member. Each had different standards. Coincidentally, they collectively tilted against Big East. Serendipity? Nah!

And seriously, NCAA exists to better lives of student athletes? Surely, you joke, sir?
 
Back
Top