The current state of the team is not purely a "we need Rysheed" problem.
By my count, in the Butler game (which I attended), we got a total of zero points from the bench. Zero, zip, nada.
So if Jordan played then perhaps we would have gotten 6 or 8 points from the bench, which may well have turned the outcome of that game.
But realistically, you cannot expect to win games when you are getting production from 5 players. Or even 6 players, especially when the result of playing your 6th player is that you are often playing a 5 guard lineup.
The result is what happened in the Seton Hall game and again in the Butler game. You hit a point in the middle of the second half when it is time to press - which is what our team is designed to do - and everyone on the floor is too exhausted to execute it.
Yes adding Jordan to the team helps because it gives you a 6th player, and right now we don't even have that. But the larger problem is that we don't have a 7th player or an 8th player. Especially up front we have zero depth (no I'm not counting the 2 minutes per game that you get from Joey D).
There are a few different ways to look at it. You could say that the guys on the bench aren't good enough to play. Or you could say that the coach can't figure out what to do with them to make them useful. Or you can say that we ran into bad luck having 2 players declared ineligible.
IMHO whichever one you pick the indictment is pretty clear. If the guys on the bench aren't any good, why were they recruited? If they have some ability, then whose job is it to make at least enough use of them to prevent the starters from being gassed in the second half? And when you have player issues (and usually multiple player issues) every single year, at what point does it no longer count as "bad luck"?
In any event, I am willing to go out on a limb and predict that we are not going to win many games getting zero production from anyone other than the Fab 5.