Steve Lavin, Suits, Ties, and Dressing the Part

Based on his bizarre rotations and propensity to oddly play walkons and guys who had previously been designated to redshirt I agree the Hardy / Brownlee thing was just good timing, blind luck or some combination of both. But he still gets credit for that. Same way Mahoney gets credit for his first team.

In retrospect maybe the Hardy Brownlee thing was the worst thing that could have happened. Lavin was forever chasing that same lightening in the bottle, playing hunches and having premonitions, as opposed to, you know, working.

Except for me it was like wandering around the desert for 6 years than finally given a glass of water. During Norm tenure I really thought we would never make another tourney ever again. I also thought there was a shot Norm would be allowed to coach in perpetuity.
This is the reason that no matter that I do agree with much of your feelings regarding Lavin, I can't totally hate him or call his tenure a disaster.
 
Of course, you do that when you have no idea what you are watching.

Well, I certainly wasn't watching putative starting PG Larry Washington, that's for sure.

Actually since you graduated in 1978, you likely weren't there, and you certainly weren't ever a part of the large student section behind the baskets. Washington was put in Carnesecca's doghouse early, but the student section was largely in favor of Washington starting over Kelly. I don't remember Garrison playing the point, and if Williams ever did, he played as a 2 guard in spot point minutes. If you ever saw Washington play, you would have know why fans who were watching favored Washington over the plodding Kelly.

Now, go back into chambers.

Don't want to get in the middle of you and Fun's thing here but Williams though not a point guard def played point guard at times. Now you are talking about my first two years as a fan. But just from my recollection Wennington and Allen split time at Center. David Russell was the four. Mullin and Goodwin played the 2/ 3. Kelly started but Williams came in for him and basically split the time at the point.


It's clear by the minutes that Williams was out there when Kelly wasn't, but Williams wasn't even close to being a PG. Washington was certainly a pg, but could take the ball to the hoop and was flashier than kelly - certainly not a Carnesecca protoypical PG.
 
Based on his bizarre rotations and propensity to oddly play walkons and guys who had previously been designated to redshirt I agree the Hardy / Brownlee thing was just good timing, blind luck or some combination of both. But he still gets credit for that. Same way Mahoney gets credit for his first team.

In retrospect maybe the Hardy Brownlee thing was the worst thing that could have happened. Lavin was forever chasing that same lightening in the bottle, playing hunches and having premonitions, as opposed to, you know, working.

Except for me it was like wandering around the desert for 6 years than finally given a glass of water. During Norm tenure I really thought we would never make another tourney ever again. I also thought there was a shot Norm would be allowed to coach in perpetuity.
This is the reason that no matter that I do agree with much of your feelings regarding Lavin, I can't totally hate him or call his tenure a disaster.
Norms last year I was actually hoping we lost games just so we could finally be rid of him. That's how bad things were with him as coach.

The more people said he is a nice guy the more I disliked him as our coach at the end. Anyone can be a freaking nice guy. Just win some f'ing games and recruiting battles
 
Based on his bizarre rotations and propensity to oddly play walkons and guys who had previously been designated to redshirt I agree the Hardy / Brownlee thing was just good timing, blind luck or some combination of both. But he still gets credit for that. Same way Mahoney gets credit for his first team.

In retrospect maybe the Hardy Brownlee thing was the worst thing that could have happened. Lavin was forever chasing that same lightening in the bottle, playing hunches and having premonitions, as opposed to, you know, working.

Except for me it was like wandering around the desert for 6 years than finally given a glass of water. During Norm tenure I really thought we would never make another tourney ever again. I also thought there was a shot Norm would be allowed to coach in perpetuity.
This is the reason that no matter that I do agree with much of your feelings regarding Lavin, I can't totally hate him or call his tenure a disaster.
Norms last year I was actually hoping we lost games just so we could finally be rid of him. That's how bad things were with him as coach.

The more people said he is a nice guy the more I disliked him as our coach at the end. Anyone can be a freaking nice guy. Just win some f'ing games and recruiting battles

BTW knew a guy on Mahoney teams and he told me that Mahoney was the nicest guy he ever played for. Same guy hated Fran.
Based off of Norm's world renowned niceness and the above Mahoney plug I guess college basketball is no place for nice guys.
 
Based on his bizarre rotations and propensity to oddly play walkons and guys who had previously been designated to redshirt I agree the Hardy / Brownlee thing was just good timing, blind luck or some combination of both. But he still gets credit for that. Same way Mahoney gets credit for his first team.

In retrospect maybe the Hardy Brownlee thing was the worst thing that could have happened. Lavin was forever chasing that same lightening in the bottle, playing hunches and having premonitions, as opposed to, you know, working.

Except for me it was like wandering around the desert for 6 years than finally given a glass of water. During Norm tenure I really thought we would never make another tourney ever again. I also thought there was a shot Norm would be allowed to coach in perpetuity.
This is the reason that no matter that I do agree with much of your feelings regarding Lavin, I can't totally hate him or call his tenure a disaster.
Norms last year I was actually hoping we lost games just so we could finally be rid of him. That's how bad things were with him as coach.

The more people said he is a nice guy the more I disliked him as our coach at the end. Anyone can be a freaking nice guy. Just win some f'ing games and recruiting battles

BTW knew a guy on Mahoney teams and he told me that Mahoney was the nicest guy he ever played for. Same guy hated Fran.
Based off of Norm's world renowned niceness and the above Mahoney plug I guess college basketball is no place for nice guys.
Haa True. Mahoney is a super nice guy. I have a friend who is good friends with him and he says the same thing. Salt of the earth type person.I never hated him like I didm Norm as our coach. I guess because he couldn't coach but he could at least recruit.
 
Of course, you do that when you have no idea what you are watching.

Well, I certainly wasn't watching putative starting PG Larry Washington, that's for sure.

Actually since you graduated in 1978, you likely weren't there, and you certainly weren't ever a part of the large student section behind the baskets. Washington was put in Carnesecca's doghouse early, but the student section was largely in favor of Washington starting over Kelly. I don't remember Garrison playing the point, and if Williams ever did, he played as a 2 guard in spot point minutes. If you ever saw Washington play, you would have know why fans who were watching favored Washington over the plodding Kelly.

Now, go back into chambers.

Don't want to get in the middle of you and Fun's thing here but Williams though not a point guard def played point guard at times. Now you are talking about my first two years as a fan. But just from my recollection Wennington and Allen split time at Center. David Russell was the four. Mullin and Goodwin played the 2/ 3. Kelly started but Williams came in for him and basically split the time at the point.

Just looked it up and those 7 guys played the majority of the minutes Mullin's Sophmore year. Ron Stewart was the 8th man in 8 man rotation.
 
Just get me there, I am a ST John's fan. You start winning one NCAA game a year and you are moving into Louie territory.

Question.

Which would you choose? Head coach Norm Roberts with Lavin's staff and players or head coach Steve Lavin with Norm's staff and players?

Choice number 3

Honestly, based purely on Norm's lack of recognition of how good Hardy and Brownlee were I would take Lavin coaching Norm's last year's team.

Norm touted himself on being a big time recruiter and that he could rebuild the program that way, supposedly having been the lead recruiter at Kansas. Overall, Lavin brought in greater talent. No one has had trouble recruiting at UCLA, including Lavin, but at least he showed he could bring in NBA level talent - something Norm could not. Neither was a very good game coach, but I'd take Lavin by a mile over Norm in that regard. Also, people speak of cleaning up the program as if it were like cleaning up mob infiltrated unions. As soon as Jarvis was gone, the stench left also.

When Jarvis left the stench was gone? Maybe his personal stench, but not the program stench. That began on that night in Pittsburgh, after Jarvis was gone. Norm had to recruit with the pungent aroma of some sanctions and tremendous scrutiny, not the least of which was from Father Harrington. He was a stopgap hire that was there to run a clean program because he was so grateful just to have a high major head coaching job. He struck out on every major recruit, but at least he fielded a team that Lavin, with Dunlap's help, ultimately benefited from. Lavin recruited NBA talent, and got little out of them except except a few disappearing acts by Jordan, a few brawls started by Dom, and a nice elbow to the head by Obekpa, after which he got his head set in the privacy of his dorm just in time for the NCAA tourney. I think these threads on Lavin continue because of what he left behind, or better put didn't leave behind. Except his prized European vacation recruit, an athletic guard who can actually play a little whom he stole a year from, and Christian Jones, who showed more under a few months under Mullin than he did in a few seasons under the other fellow.

Pitt happened because the school was too cheap to hire a temporary staff, and there was not enough oversight on the road. Not because of anything Jarvis did, or his successor.

Would you have guessed CO would turn out to be a knucklehead? Even so, people here were still on his side when it looked like he would return for senior season. His stupid suspension likely came out of the lack of knowledge that you can still test positive for marijuana 30 days after using it. I doubt he was the only one on the team who ever smoked. Harkless, Sampson, Jordan, Obekpa, Harrison, Pointer, Greene were all considerably better than what Norm produced overall.

Before you continue the myth that Norm was great at cleaning up the program, he also went after headaches like Stephenson - so he wasn't exactly recruiting altar boys - he just took whatever he could. I don't remember any public disclosure that he had passed on anyone. If Lavin passed on Jordan and CO, other big programs would have grabbed them

Pitt happened because 3 troublemakers screwed up. Maybe it would not have happened if Jarvis was not fired in December, or maybe they would have done worse. The point is that the issue with Jarvis was his squabbles with the SJU hierarchy and the poor start his final year. That's hardly a stench. The Pitt fiasco was the stench. Who caused it is immaterial. If norm came and pulled a Calipari, we would all be discussing Met off season acquisitions and not SJU basketball.
 
Back
Top