Staff Change

Status
Not open for further replies.
[quote="Logen" post=283278][quote="Mike Zaun" post=283244][quote="NCJohnnie" post=283235]AlBovino wrote: Nobody on this board has insight into whether Mullin is doing his job or not. It is just negative conjecture by a bunch of lousy fans.

Al, the idea that posters who say anything critical of the staff are "lousy fans" doesn't make sense to me. That is what fans do, express their feelings towards their team and staff, which will be sometimes negative and sometimes positive. Many of us who are questioning how hard the staff is working on the recruiting front based on what we read are major Mullin supporters and want desperately to see him succeed. That doesn't mean we can't question staff's actions at times whether in terms of in game strategy, appearance of recruiting efforts etc.
The only time I question objectivity is where posters never have anything bad (or conversely anything good) to say about a coach (whether Mullin, Lavin, Norm etc.); nobody is right or wrong all the time.[/quote]

This is what I have been saying is exclusive to the SJ fanbase. Any criticism of staff or the program as a whole and suddenly you're "evil" or a "terrible fan". I will go back to the raising a kid analogy...the strict parents are the best parents. Their kids may get upset at times and people may say they are "mean" or whatever but it comes from a place of love. You must be critical of who your child hangs out with, where they are hanging out, what time they are hanging out, their grades, behavior, etc. Being critical means you care. If none of us cared, we would accept this failure but we refuse to.

Our program has done a lot wrong over the years and we feel much more can be done and it isn't. That plus not winning an NCAA tourney game in decades and being on the bottom 3 straight years is rightfully wearing fans down. If we do not make big leaps, pull the plug after next year[/quote]

Okay, I’ll bite; tell me why we pull the plug and start over? We pull the plug after what is essentially Mullin’s 3rd year because of what has happened over the last “decades”? Really? One of my big problems with the Mullin criticism is it is founded on the type of senseless emotion you exhibit. Okay recruiting, someone please explain how we have been mentioned with so many recruits we would all like to see here if we ARE NOT OUT RECRUITING. Someone also explain why, objectively and dispassionately why a big time recruit should pick SJU over say Ohio St. (Muhammad) or SJU over say Kansas (Achuwia). Then someone explain the obsession with a “big” when the single most thing derailing what might have been a very satisfying season a year ago was the loss of a “small.” We have a full roster of relatively highly rated recruits we got largely via the transfer but so what? Someone explain why HOW we get players is more important than IF we get players. Nevada gets transfers and are praised on the board, we do it and it is treated as if the players came here with leprosy. I have posted these points in one form or another and I am sure there are some that are sick of me but I feel the points are legitimate and they aren’t addressed by Mullin critics. I seem to be an incredible Mullin supporter and in reality I am not at all; I just don’t see why anyone would want to start over with the absolute pile of sh#t he inherited and the improvements the program has made in 2 years. Has he won me over? No. Do we need to show tangible improvement again next year? Yes, but I sure as hell think we are a long way from considering a coaching change at this time. It takes time, it took time for the best of the best, but it shoudn’t for Mullin? So I am left asking those little huge three letters, WHY?[/quote]

No matter how you try to spin the chronology next April is FOUR (4) YEARS of pursuing recruits which would have begun when they were 9th graders. WHY?
Why not?
We are all waiting anxiously and hoping for a big turnaround next year. If that happens AND Mullin and staff can reel in their top 2 or 3 recruits then you, me and Whistler's mother would be very happy. Then extend Mullin if he is really interested in a long term coaching career and if he tries to shove GSJ into the slot instead, just part ways. Again, the "best of the best" you keep regurgitating were very young coaches, who, even then, had more experience than Mullin when they struggled. While not old by any measure Chris will turn 55 this summer. He is a retired multi-millionaire. I just don’t think he is in it long term or 100%. Neither is Richmond. Let's see if he proves us wrong.
 
Last edited:
[quote="Class of 72" post=283284][quote="Logen" post=283278][quote="Mike Zaun" post=283244][quote="NCJohnnie" post=283235]AlBovino wrote: Nobody on this board has insight into whether Mullin is doing his job or not. It is just negative conjecture by a bunch of lousy fans.

Al, the idea that posters who say anything critical of the staff are "lousy fans" doesn't make sense to me. That is what fans do, express their feelings towards their team and staff, which will be sometimes negative and sometimes positive. Many of us who are questioning how hard the staff is working on the recruiting front based on what we read are major Mullin supporters and want desperately to see him succeed. That doesn't mean we can't question staff's actions at times whether in terms of in game strategy, appearance of recruiting efforts etc.
The only time I question objectivity is where posters never have anything bad (or conversely anything good) to say about a coach (whether Mullin, Lavin, Norm etc.); nobody is right or wrong all the time.[/quote]

This is what I have been saying is exclusive to the SJ fanbase. Any criticism of staff or the program as a whole and suddenly you're "evil" or a "terrible fan". I will go back to the raising a kid analogy...the strict parents are the best parents. Their kids may get upset at times and people may say they are "mean" or whatever but it comes from a place of love. You must be critical of who your child hangs out with, where they are hanging out, what time they are hanging out, their grades, behavior, etc. Being critical means you care. If none of us cared, we would accept this failure but we refuse to.

Our program has done a lot wrong over the years and we feel much more can be done and it isn't. That plus not winning an NCAA tourney game in decades and being on the bottom 3 straight years is rightfully wearing fans down. If we do not make big leaps, pull the plug after next year[/quote]

Okay, I’ll bite; tell me why we pull the plug and start over? We pull the plug after what is essentially Mullin’s 3rd year because of what has happened over the last “decades”? Really? One of my big problems with the Mullin criticism is it is founded on the type of senseless emotion you exhibit. Okay recruiting, someone please explain how we have been mentioned with so many recruits we would all like to see here if we ARE NOT OUT RECRUITING. Someone also explain why, objectively and dispassionately why a big time recruit should pick SJU over say Ohio St. (Muhammad) or SJU over say Kansas (Achuwia). Then someone explain the obsession with a “big” when the single most thing derailing what might have been a very satisfying season a year ago was the loss of a “small.” We have a full roster of relatively highly rated recruits we got largely via the transfer but so what? Someone explain why HOW we get players is more important than IF we get players. Nevada gets transfers and are praised on the board, we do it and it is treated as if the players came here with leprosy. I have posted these points in one form or another and I am sure there are some that are sick of me but I feel the points are legitimate and they aren’t addressed by Mullin critics. I seem to be an incredible Mullin supporter and in reality I am not at all; I just don’t see why anyone would want to start over with the absolute pile of sh#t he inherited and the improvements the program has made in 2 years. Has he won me over? No. Do we need to show tangible improvement again next year? Yes, but I sure as hell think we are a long way from considering a coaching change at this time. It takes time, it took time for the best of the best, but it shoudn’t for Mullin? So I am left asking those little huge three letters, WHY?[/quote]

No matter how you try to spin the chronology next April is FOUR (4) YEARS of pursuing recruits which would have begun when they were 9th graders. WHY?
Why not?
We are all waiting anxiously and hoping for a big turnaround next year. If that happens AND Mullin and staff can reel in their top 2 or 3 recruits then you, me and Whistler's mother would be very happy. Then extend Mullin if he is really interested in a long term coaching career and if he tries to shove JSJ into the slot instead, just part ways. Again, the "best of the best" you keep regurgitating were very young coaches, who, even then, had more experience than Mullin when they struggled. While not old by any measure Chris will turn 55 this summer. He is a retired multi-millionaire. I just don’t think he is in it long term or 100%. Neither is Richmond. Let's see if he proves us wrong.[/quote]

Please correct your post to GSJ from JSJ our most esteemed poster !!! :)
 
Last edited:
[quote="Chicago Days" post=283272][quote="OLV72" post=283270][quote="oldschool Redmen" post=283268][quote="AlBovino" post=283238]"Only if I knew what? Who has such insight of all the posters repeating ad nauseam their negativity towards this coaching staff. As for my agenda it is simple. Allow the coaching staff the leeway to do their job and then judge their success on the court. Last season is over. Chris and company should be judged based on next year's performance, not on guesses by people who have no idea what is going on.[/quote]

Yea Al, leave Chris do it his way, don't gotta go to recruiting events, wtf should there any coaching changers, and when we need a big and he comes to campus, why the need to go and see him??? We got Matt, he can handle it.
Chris doesn't gotta do jack f'ing shit. Just take the 2million a year and play horse with his buddy mitch.

Well if Ponds leaves, and they are garbage once again and it's 4 years of nothing under Chris, he deserves to get ripped bad. Hey if chris didn't want to atleast recruit then why take the damn job?[/quote]

Old School, I think it is fair to post that the few posters defending Mullin would not disagree with ripping him if year 4 is bad. What a few find annoying is the constant bashing by the ten or so posters "in the know" during this off-season.

Even threads welcoming recruits are turned into criticism of the staff by the same handful of posters.

I think people should relax and let this play out next season. Bashing the staff at this point is not accomplishing anything. We all know who thinks the staff is lazy, dumb and shitty. If the team sucks next season there will be a change.[/quote]

Most posters recognize that CM inherited a roster bereft of high-major talent in 2015, and most are anticipating a very competitive team in 2018-19–if Ponds returns.
The problem is that most recognize a short window to recruit and the absolute necessity of landing our top targets in the 2019 Class to be competitive for more than 1 year every 5.
And the ‘rub’ is there seems to be a marked disconnect between how our staff is recruiting those targets versus how our major competitors are pursuing these kids.
Hence, we seek answers and push for a capably-run Staff before it is too late, except to cry in our beer (or vino—but I digress).[/quote]

Chicago, what good is harping on your point with the same ten posters a few times a day doing? Are you getting your answers from Mullin or from his boss? I don't think so. The only result your repetitive points produce is more negativity on a program that has endured way too many lousy years.

I am all for negativty if the thing falls apart next season. I don't think it will, but I am just a fan hoping the gradual improvement trends upward next year and beyond. I am not "in the know" like a few posters claim to be. Maybe they are right and it comes crumbling down in a year or two.

The best contributor on this site advised posters to be patient from the beginning. We are now going into year four (or year three if you want to be fair in a world where most of us hide behind handles).

Is patience too much to ask for?

Let's see what the record is next year.
 
[quote="OLV72" post=283292][quote="Chicago Days" post=283272][quote="OLV72" post=283270][quote="oldschool Redmen" post=283268][quote="AlBovino" post=283238]"Only if I knew what? Who has such insight of all the posters repeating ad nauseam their negativity towards this coaching staff. As for my agenda it is simple. Allow the coaching staff the leeway to do their job and then judge their success on the court. Last season is over. Chris and company should be judged based on next year's performance, not on guesses by people who have no idea what is going on.[/quote]

Yea Al, leave Chris do it his way, don't gotta go to recruiting events, wtf should there any coaching changers, and when we need a big and he comes to campus, why the need to go and see him??? We got Matt, he can handle it.
Chris doesn't gotta do jack f'ing shit. Just take the 2million a year and play horse with his buddy mitch.

Well if Ponds leaves, and they are garbage once again and it's 4 years of nothing under Chris, he deserves to get ripped bad. Hey if chris didn't want to atleast recruit then why take the damn job?[/quote]

Old School, I think it is fair to post that the few posters defending Mullin would not disagree with ripping him if year 4 is bad. What a few find annoying is the constant bashing by the ten or so posters "in the know" during this off-season.

Even threads welcoming recruits are turned into criticism of the staff by the same handful of posters.

I think people should relax and let this play out next season. Bashing the staff at this point is not accomplishing anything. We all know who thinks the staff is lazy, dumb and shitty. If the team sucks next season there will be a change.[/quote]

Most posters recognize that CM inherited a roster bereft of high-major talent in 2015, and most are anticipating a very competitive team in 2018-19–if Ponds returns.
The problem is that most recognize a short window to recruit and the absolute necessity of landing our top targets in the 2019 Class to be competitive for more than 1 year every 5.
And the ‘rub’ is there seems to be a marked disconnect between how our staff is recruiting those targets versus how our major competitors are pursuing these kids.
Hence, we seek answers and push for a capably-run Staff before it is too late, except to cry in our beer (or vino—but I digress).[/quote]

Chicago, what good is harping on your point with the same ten posters a few times a day doing? Are you getting your answers from Mullin or from his boss? I don't think so. The only result your repetitive points produce is more negativity on a program that has endured way too many lousy years.

I am all for negativty if the thing falls apart next season. I don't think it will, but I am just a fan hoping the gradual improvement trends upward next year and beyond. I am not "in the know" like a few posters claim to be. Maybe they are right and it comes crumbling down in a year or two.

The best contributor on this site advised posters to be patient from the beginning. We are now going into year four (or year three if you want to be fair in a world where most of us hide behind handles).

Is patience too much to ask for?

Let's see what the record is next year.[/quote]

Okay OLV72, I'm with you in hoping for a good 2018-19 season "and beyond".
Let's go Johnnies.
 
Chicago Days wrote: OLV72 wrote:
Chicago Days wrote:
OLV72 wrote:
oldschool Redmen wrote:
AlBovino wrote: "Only if I knew what? Who has such insight of all the posters repeating ad nauseam their negativity towards this coaching staff. As for my agenda it is simple. Allow the coaching staff the leeway to do their job and then judge their success on the court. Last season is over. Chris and company should be judged based on next year's performance, not on guesses by people who have no idea what is going on.

Yea Al, leave Chris do it his way, don't gotta go to recruiting events, wtf should there any coaching changers, and when we need a big and he comes to campus, why the need to go and see him??? We got Matt, he can handle it.
Chris doesn't gotta do jack f'ing shit. Just take the 2million a year and play horse with his buddy mitch.

Well if Ponds leaves, and they are garbage once again and it's 4 years of nothing under Chris, he deserves to get ripped bad. Hey if chris didn't want to atleast recruit then why take the damn job?


Old School, I think it is fair to post that the few posters defending Mullin would not disagree with ripping him if year 4 is bad. What a few find annoying is the constant bashing by the ten or so posters "in the know" during this off-season.

Even threads welcoming recruits are turned into criticism of the staff by the same handful of posters.

I think people should relax and let this play out next season. Bashing the staff at this point is not accomplishing anything. We all know who thinks the staff is lazy, dumb and shitty. If the team sucks next season there will be a change.


Most posters recognize that CM inherited a roster bereft of high-major talent in 2015, and most are anticipating a very competitive team in 2018-19–if Ponds returns.
The problem is that most recognize a short window to recruit and the absolute necessity of landing our top targets in the 2019 Class to be competitive for more than 1 year every 5.
And the ‘rub’ is there seems to be a marked disconnect between how our staff is recruiting those targets versus how our major competitors are pursuing these kids.
Hence, we seek answers and push for a capably-run Staff before it is too late, except to cry in our beer (or vino—but I digress).


Chicago, what good is harping on your point with the same ten posters a few times a day doing? Are you getting your answers from Mullin or from his boss? I don't think so. The only result your repetitive points produce is more negativity on a program that has endured way too many lousy years.

I am all for negativty if the thing falls apart next season. I don't think it will, but I am just a fan hoping the gradual improvement trends upward next year and beyond. I am not "in the know" like a few posters claim to be. Maybe they are right and it comes crumbling down in a year or two.

The best contributor on this site advised posters to be patient from the beginning. We are now going into year four (or year three if you want to be fair in a world where most of us hide behind handles).

Is patience too much to ask for?

Let's see what the record is next year.


Okay OLV72, I'm with you in hoping for a good 2018-19 season "and beyond".
Let's go Johnnies.

I agree. Maybe if we all stop bitching, between now and May 31 the staff will add the elusive big and Shamorie will announce his return for a triumphant 2018-2019 season. If at least the second one happens, next year should be fun. In the meanwhile, if anyone has a non-chalk winner for next week's Derby let me know. I am crossing one item off my bucket list with a trip to the Oaks & Derby next weekend.
 
[quote="NCJohnnie" post=283300]Chicago Days wrote: OLV72 wrote:
Chicago Days wrote:
OLV72 wrote:
oldschool Redmen wrote:
AlBovino wrote: "Only if I knew what? Who has such insight of all the posters repeating ad nauseam their negativity towards this coaching staff. As for my agenda it is simple. Allow the coaching staff the leeway to do their job and then judge their success on the court. Last season is over. Chris and company should be judged based on next year's performance, not on guesses by people who have no idea what is going on.

Yea Al, leave Chris do it his way, don't gotta go to recruiting events, wtf should there any coaching changers, and when we need a big and he comes to campus, why the need to go and see him??? We got Matt, he can handle it.
Chris doesn't gotta do jack f'ing shit. Just take the 2million a year and play horse with his buddy mitch.

Well if Ponds leaves, and they are garbage once again and it's 4 years of nothing under Chris, he deserves to get ripped bad. Hey if chris didn't want to atleast recruit then why take the damn job?


Old School, I think it is fair to post that the few posters defending Mullin would not disagree with ripping him if year 4 is bad. What a few find annoying is the constant bashing by the ten or so posters "in the know" during this off-season.

Even threads welcoming recruits are turned into criticism of the staff by the same handful of posters.

I think people should relax and let this play out next season. Bashing the staff at this point is not accomplishing anything. We all know who thinks the staff is lazy, dumb and shitty. If the team sucks next season there will be a change.


Most posters recognize that CM inherited a roster bereft of high-major talent in 2015, and most are anticipating a very competitive team in 2018-19–if Ponds returns.
The problem is that most recognize a short window to recruit and the absolute necessity of landing our top targets in the 2019 Class to be competitive for more than 1 year every 5.
And the ‘rub’ is there seems to be a marked disconnect between how our staff is recruiting those targets versus how our major competitors are pursuing these kids.
Hence, we seek answers and push for a capably-run Staff before it is too late, except to cry in our beer (or vino—but I digress).


Chicago, what good is harping on your point with the same ten posters a few times a day doing? Are you getting your answers from Mullin or from his boss? I don't think so. The only result your repetitive points produce is more negativity on a program that has endured way too many lousy years.

I am all for negativty if the thing falls apart next season. I don't think it will, but I am just a fan hoping the gradual improvement trends upward next year and beyond. I am not "in the know" like a few posters claim to be. Maybe they are right and it comes crumbling down in a year or two.

The best contributor on this site advised posters to be patient from the beginning. We are now going into year four (or year three if you want to be fair in a world where most of us hide behind handles).

Is patience too much to ask for?

Let's see what the record is next year.


Okay OLV72, I'm with you in hoping for a good 2018-19 season "and beyond".
Let's go Johnnies.

I agree. Maybe if we all stop bitching, between now and May 31 the staff will add the elusive big and Shamorie will announce his return for a triumphant 2018-2019 season. If at least the second one happens, next year should be fun. In the meanwhile, if anyone has a non-chalk winner for next week's Derby let me know. I am crossing one item off my bucket list with a trip to the Oaks & Derby next weekend.[/quote]

Yeah, Shamorie and LJF would make a great tandem. Let's hope.
Meanwhile enjoy the Ponies, NCJohnnie!
 
[quote="Paultzman" post=283274][quote="Knight" post=283271]Where's our AD?[/quote]
Goff is not CM’s boss. Theoretically Joe Oliva is.[/quote]

Bingo, and Oliva answers to some big time boosters.
 
[quote="OLV72" post=283292][quote="Chicago Days" post=283272][quote="OLV72" post=283270][quote="oldschool Redmen" post=283268][quote="AlBovino" post=283238]"Only if I knew what? Who has such insight of all the posters repeating ad nauseam their negativity towards this coaching staff. As for my agenda it is simple. Allow the coaching staff the leeway to do their job and then judge their success on the court. Last season is over. Chris and company should be judged based on next year's performance, not on guesses by people who have no idea what is going on.[/quote]

Yea Al, leave Chris do it his way, don't gotta go to recruiting events, wtf should there any coaching changers, and when we need a big and he comes to campus, why the need to go and see him??? We got Matt, he can handle it.
Chris doesn't gotta do jack f'ing shit. Just take the 2million a year and play horse with his buddy mitch.

Well if Ponds leaves, and they are garbage once again and it's 4 years of nothing under Chris, he deserves to get ripped bad. Hey if chris didn't want to atleast recruit then why take the damn job?[/quote]

Old School, I think it is fair to post that the few posters defending Mullin would not disagree with ripping him if year 4 is bad. What a few find annoying is the constant bashing by the ten or so posters "in the know" during this off-season.

Even threads welcoming recruits are turned into criticism of the staff by the same handful of posters.

I think people should relax and let this play out next season. Bashing the staff at this point is not accomplishing anything. We all know who thinks the staff is lazy, dumb and shitty. If the team sucks next season there will be a change.[/quote]

Most posters recognize that CM inherited a roster bereft of high-major talent in 2015, and most are anticipating a very competitive team in 2018-19–if Ponds returns.
The problem is that most recognize a short window to recruit and the absolute necessity of landing our top targets in the 2019 Class to be competitive for more than 1 year every 5.
And the ‘rub’ is there seems to be a marked disconnect between how our staff is recruiting those targets versus how our major competitors are pursuing these kids.
Hence, we seek answers and push for a capably-run Staff before it is too late, except to cry in our beer (or vino—but I digress).[/quote]

Chicago, what good is harping on your point with the same ten posters a few times a day doing? Are you getting your answers from Mullin or from his boss? I don't think so. The only result your repetitive points produce is more negativity on a program that has endured way too many lousy years.

I am all for negativty if the thing falls apart next season. I don't think it will, but I am just a fan hoping the gradual improvement trends upward next year and beyond. I am not "in the know" like a few posters claim to be. Maybe they are right and it comes crumbling down in a year or two.

The best contributor on this site advised posters to be patient from the beginning. We are now going into year four (or year three if you want to be fair in a world where most of us hide behind handles).

Is patience too much to ask for?

Let's see what the record is next year.[/quote]

I'm one of the more optimistic people you may run into or on here. But, why stick your head in the sand particularly when it has reared its head on more than a couple occasions?

There's a word called manifestation. If the staff as a whole isn't working hard enough on the recruiting trail, then it'll eventually manifest itself. So, I can't trust 'em to right this ship long-term when they can't competently put forth effort into something that is the lifeline when it comes to winning in collegiate sports.

Even if we have "success" next season (I have to use quotations on the word, as some people consider mediocrity as "success"), that doesn't suggest there will be success in the future. If they was out there busting their ass on the recruiting trail, then they'd be catching less flak. Some people would still complain, but they would probably be less vocal and there would be less bellyaching overall.

Winning games is paramount, but how can some of y'all trust 'em to get and remain on the right track when there's limited effort being put forth on something as imperative as recruiting?

No staff should be out here relaxing. We're certainly in no position to unwind and kick up.
 
Last edited:
[quote="Tom in Salem" post=283308][quote="Paultzman" post=283274][quote="Knight" post=283271]Where's our AD?[/quote]
Goff is not CM’s boss. Theoretically Joe Oliva is.[/quote]

Bingo, and Oliva answers to some big time boosters.[/quote]

So Logen, Al Bovino and SlyFox are big time boosters?
 
MJD - Its derby week. I'm taking NC Johnnie's advice and putting my spare time into trying to pick the derby winner.

If that's putting my head in the sand - guilty as charged.
 
All this negativity is smoke from another fire. Mullin and his staff have conducted themselves honorably. It sounds like some want to win whatever the cost.....we are St Johns! We are not desperate and to all the negativity: we dont need your advice. GO St Johns!!!
 
[quote="Class of 72" post=283311][quote="Tom in Salem" post=283308][quote="Paultzman" post=283274][quote="Knight" post=283271]Where's our AD?[/quote]
Goff is not CM’s boss. Theoretically Joe Oliva is.[/quote]

Bingo, and Oliva answers to some big time boosters.[/quote]

So Logen, Al Bovino and SlyFox are big time boosters?[/quote]

Lol helps.
 
[quote="johnny redman" post=283321]All this negativity is smoke from another fire. Mullin and his staff have conducted themselves honorably. It sounds like some want to win whatever the cost.....we are St Johns! We are not desperate and to all the negativity: we dont need your advice. GO St Johns!!![/quote]

........and his staff have conducted themselves honorably............
Not according to the Maven. Then again........
 
[quote="johnny redman" post=283321]All this negativity is smoke from another fire. Mullin and his staff have conducted themselves honorably. It sounds like some want to win whatever the cost.....we are St Johns! We are not desperate and to all the negativity: we dont need your advice. GO St Johns!!![/quote]

I would suggest there should be something in between total negativity and completely ignoring some red flags.
 
[quote="JohnnyFan" post=283325][quote="johnny redman" post=283321]All this negativity is smoke from another fire. Mullin and his staff have conducted themselves honorably. It sounds like some want to win whatever the cost.....we are St Johns! We are not desperate and to all the negativity: we dont need your advice. GO St Johns!!![/quote]

I would suggest there should be something in between total negativity and completely ignoring some red flags.[/quote]

There is.......it is called democracy.
 
We are the only fanbase in sports that has many regarding the willful ignorance of red flags as virtuous. Imagine Browns fans slamming any fellow Browns fan questioning whether or not they need a QB. "You bite your tongue!" one of them says to the other. "Our QB situation is fine, it's your negativity that isn't helping!", he adds.

Again, being negative implies that even in the face of success, you may find negatives in it. In theory, myself and others dubbed "anti-Mullin" even though I assist with the "Mullin's Maniacs" Twitter account want him to fail and would be angry even as a top 25 tournament team. If he somehow pulls a rabbit out of his hat and turns us into a powerhouse, this board will be delirious in positivity.
 
Last edited:
[quote="Paultzman" post=284247]Appearing unlikely.[/quote]

If it turns out to be his downfall, he has no one to blame but himself. Hopefully it works out, but having one recruiter rarely does.
 
[quote="L J S A" post=284250][quote="Paultzman" post=284247]Appearing unlikely.[/quote]

If it turns out to be his downfall, he has no one to blame but himself. Hopefully it works out, but having one recruiter rarely does.[/quote]

It's a very, big deal. People who continue to ignore it, dispel it, or act like it's all made up tales are fooling or lying to themselves.

It's a hindrance and won't allow our program to maximize its potential.

I actually had been hearing this was a "no go" for a couple weeks. Certainly, no offense against Paultz, as he gets solid info, but my source was "mute" on this taking place.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top