Sonoma State

 By the way, great news about Marco and Sanchez "The issue isn't their eligibility but their class status classification" -SB Nation. So basically they are fine they just need to find out if they are Sophs, Seniors, etc. They will play.
 

That's good news. I am glad you cleared that up. No more of that crap is needed from the NCAA.
 
 It would be nice if I didn't get attacked for just one day for a 100% relevant post. If I was 48 would you guys be all over me? Probably not. Just because you are older does not make you an expert on anything.
 

You really need to stop playing the martyr. If you were 48 and acting the way you do everyone would still think you were a douche. It has nothing to do with age.
 
 It's ok, I understand the midlife crisis rage it's a confusing time eh?. Let it all out. I offer my opinion on this board and I get treated like I eat babies and wear a Nazi uniform. Ever consider (god forbid middle aged men are capable) that you guys are acting like douches to me? I regularly post relevant stuff in an effort to make the forum better and give you guys information. I like to share my enthusiasm for SJ. Then I get replies like, "We get it.", "You are a douche", "Your analysis is a joke", etc. What do you expect me to say after douchey replies like that..."Thank you sir, may I have another"? I'm not beneath you and I don't take crap...I've been the man of my house since I was 14 years old so I don't have time for that tough guy crap. I'll admit I started some altercations very early on in this forum and was misguided, but I really put it past me trying to improve the content of the forum and help by sharing links and offering differing and possibly interesting perspectives. So, it's damned if I do, damned if I don't. If I act like a douche I get treated like one, and even when I'm trying to be a productive member of a forum community I get treated like a douche. Do any of you have the balls to admit that some of the guys on here have been dicks to me when it was uncalled for? I can take criticism if it's relevant and respectful, but if it's just personal attacks and name calling like I've been getting unprovoked, then that's the epitome of douchebaggery.
 
Joe - what follows may not apply to you at all so please don't take it personally - but when I was young someone pointed this out to me:

"Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something."

I still need to remind myself of Plato's admonition.
 
 It's ok, I understand the midlife crisis rage it's a confusing time eh?. Let it all out. I offer my opinion on this board and I get treated like I eat babies and wear a Nazi uniform. Ever consider (god forbid middle aged men are capable) that you guys are acting like douches to me? I regularly post relevant stuff in an effort to make the forum better and give you guys information. I like to share my enthusiasm for SJ. Then I get replies like, "We get it.", "You are a douche", "Your analysis is a joke", etc. What do you expect me to say after douchey replies like that..."Thank you sir, may I have another"? I'm not beneath you and I don't take crap...I've been the man of my house since I was 14 years old so I don't have time for that tough guy crap. I'll admit I started some altercations very early on in this forum and was misguided, but I really put it past me trying to improve the content of the forum and help by sharing links and offering differing and possibly interesting perspectives. So, it's damned if I do, damned if I don't. If I act like a douche I get treated like one, and even when I'm trying to be a productive member of a forum community I get treated like a douche. Do any of you have the balls to admit that some of the guys on here have been dicks to me when it was uncalled for? I can take criticism if it's relevant and respectful, but if it's just personal attacks and name calling like I've been getting unprovoked, then that's the epitome of douchebaggery.
 

Joe, I have to say that your posts of late have been really good. I don't have a problem with what you've done lately. Bottom line though is that you came on these boards like a real prick and pissed off a lot of people. It wasn't anybody else, it was you. Some people still have that first, second and third impression that you put forth singed into their brain. It might take a while to get rid of that reputation. Unfortunately there's nobody else to blame for it but yourself.

Personally, I think your posts as much better and have certainly changed for the better. Keep up the basketball stuff and eventually it will probably subside.
 
 It's ok, I understand the midlife crisis rage it's a confusing time eh?. Let it all out. I offer my opinion on this board and I get treated like I eat babies and wear a Nazi uniform. Ever consider (god forbid middle aged men are capable) that you guys are acting like douches to me? I regularly post relevant stuff in an effort to make the forum better and give you guys information. I like to share my enthusiasm for SJ. Then I get replies like, "We get it.", "You are a douche", "Your analysis is a joke", etc. What do you expect me to say after douchey replies like that..."Thank you sir, may I have another"? I'm not beneath you and I don't take crap...I've been the man of my house since I was 14 years old so I don't have time for that tough guy crap. I'll admit I started some altercations very early on in this forum and was misguided, but I really put it past me trying to improve the content of the forum and help by sharing links and offering differing and possibly interesting perspectives. So, it's damned if I do, damned if I don't. If I act like a douche I get treated like one, and even when I'm trying to be a productive member of a forum community I get treated like a douche. Do any of you have the balls to admit that some of the guys on here have been dicks to me when it was uncalled for? I can take criticism if it's relevant and respectful, but if it's just personal attacks and name calling like I've been getting unprovoked, then that's the epitome of douchebaggery.
 

Joe, I have to say that your posts of late have been really good. I don't have a problem with what you've done lately. Bottom line though is that you came on these boards like a real prick and pissed off a lot of people. It wasn't anybody else, it was you. Some people still have that first, second and third impression that you put forth singed into their brain. It might take a while to get rid of that reputation. Unfortunately there's nobody else to blame for it but yourself.

Personally, I think your posts as much better and have certainly changed for the better. Keep up the basketball stuff and eventually it will probably subside.

As Will Rogers put it, "You don't get a second chance to make a good first impression."

Joe, if you feel provoked or unjustly maligned or attacked -- and I can understand how you might -- get the anger out of your system by writing all the vitriolic retorts you can ... just don't post them. 
 
I was very encouraged by Phil Greene's shooting last night. As someone who is going to play a lot of minutes (especially until Branch is able to play), I believe he will be crucial (along with Harrison and Bourgault) in making sure that opposing defenses stay 'honest' with us. It was be nice to see the interior open up more this year because of better outside shooting.

 
 
 So basically if a player shot an air ball once, that means you should boo him and bench him, because obviously he needs to continuously pay for his mistake. Bottom line is, if only one man extends an olive branch, it won't work. You are acting like I made some kind of unforgivable sin in saying a few stupid things last year. I will not get on my knees and beg...I have put all the crap well behind me and the rest of the board, but others are trying to start up again. As MCNPA said, I have contributed to the forum in a positive way for a while now, but it seems many people on here would rather be confrontational rather than embracing like they are to literally everyone else. As fathers, I wonder what you would think of this situation if I was your son. I can almost guarantee your view would vastly change. I must say I think I walked into the wrong forum. It feels like I walked into someone's house at a party where everyone was already friends long before I got there and I'm the odd man out. I'm just not going to win no matter what I do. I notice a ton of double standards...I make a thread about the women's exhibition and I get told it needs to be moved. Someone makes a thread about getting married or voting for some movie, and it's well accepted. It takes 2 to tango guys...I can act like Ghandi for the next 10 years, but if you guys don't stop with the attitude and confrontational replies, then that's on you. The 23 year old admitted some wrongdoing, yet the 40-50 yr olds are being stubborn refusing to admit I do get a raw deal fairly often even after making relevant posts. What kind of world are we living in? I don't ask that you accept me as a friend, all I ask if that I don't get swatted (like Obekpa) at every time I make a post even if it's genuine and well-intentioned.
 
Joe
I haven't been paying much attention to most posts but I thought your post was relevant and thoughtful. However I do disagree with your follow up on Jones. To judge a kids potential development based on his first exhibition game is harsh. If that what we are basing things on D'Angelo would never get off the pines. 
 
 Hey Joe, stop arguing about why people don't like you and it will go away. Just move on and post about basketball. Don't be like the guy in the medium tee shirt.
 
 Moose, my bet is that they went man-to-man to really just get principles. In the past, we skipped that just to get into zones and learn those principles. Bottom line though, is that our zones rely on matching up with man principles. Best way to start off is learning how to play good man defense and then advancing into different zones. We have the personnel to do so now. I really love those zones and I'm positive we will use them extensively, but starting off learning how to close out on shooters and playing solid man defense is really IMO the best way to start working on defense.

Btw, thanks for your synopsis moose. Sounds like we have a lot to look forward to, and we were missing , branch, Bourgault, Sanchez, Gift, Balamou and our best player was having a bad day. Imagine how good we might look at full strength??

I was surprised we didn't see ANY zone at all. We gave up a lot of 3's which in a zone I'd understand and have less of an issue with. The man to man didnt seem fluid tonight and lots of 3's were hoisted. Just saying.

Agree re: man-to-man...their movement seem to give us trouble at times resulting in open 3s...but overall I was happy and impressed with the level of talent
 
 One thing I observed was we were giving too many open threes defensively. It was a problem this year and if we were getting burned by Sonoma State we are going to get burned by many other teams. That being said I trust Lavin probably saw that issue last night and will put a stop to it.
 
. Gift and Hooper were in sweats and never got in the game. Anyone know why?

Coach says Gift and Felix may redshirt this year. Hooper HAS to sit out his transfer year.
 

And why would we redshirt God's Gift? Do we really believe we would have enough rebounding without G.G. We need him off the bench, especially if our big boys get in foul trouble.
 
. Gift and Hooper were in sweats and never got in the game. Anyone know why?

Coach says Gift and Felix may redshirt this year. Hooper HAS to sit out his transfer year.
 

And why would we redshirt God's Gift? Do we really believe we would have enough rebounding without G.G. We need him off the bench, especially if our big boys get in foul trouble.
 

Frontcourt right now is Obekpa, Sanchez, Karr, Jones. Gift would be 5th there. We also know that Amir can spell some time at a 4. Instead of losing Sanchez AND Gift in one fell swoop next year stagger it and have him come back.
 
. Gift and Hooper were in sweats and never got in the game. Anyone know why?

Coach says Gift and Felix may redshirt this year. Hooper HAS to sit out his transfer year.
 

And why would we redshirt God's Gift? Do we really believe we would have enough rebounding without G.G. We need him off the bench, especially if our big boys get in foul trouble.
 

Frontcourt right now is Obekpa, Sanchez, Karr, Jones. Gift would be 5th there. We also know that Amir can spell some time at a 4. Instead of losing Sanchez AND Gift in one fell swoop next year stagger it and have him come back.
 

Agree Moose, but it could leave us with only 1 scholarship to give.
 
. Gift and Hooper were in sweats and never got in the game. Anyone know why?

Coach says Gift and Felix may redshirt this year. Hooper HAS to sit out his transfer year.
 

And why would we redshirt God's Gift? Do we really believe we would have enough rebounding without G.G. We need him off the bench, especially if our big boys get in foul trouble.
 

Frontcourt right now is Obekpa, Sanchez, Karr, Jones. Gift would be 5th there. We also know that Amir can spell some time at a 4. Instead of losing Sanchez AND Gift in one fell swoop next year stagger it and have him come back.
 

Agree Moose, but it could leave us with only 1 scholarship to give.
 

'Could'
And do you honestly think the way they staff was recruiting 13 that they expect 1 ship?
 
 This is somewhat off-topic, but did they have any giveaway for season ticket holders at the game Saturday?
Maybe I was oblivious, but I didn't see it.

Was hoping for a good gift again like the Mullin jersey from last season. Anybody know?
 
Back
Top