beast of the east
Active member
What you say is mostly correct, though many if not most or all of highly competitive universities state up front that they will provide all necessary assistance for qualified students from impoverished backgrounds to be able to attend the school via scholarships and grants.lawmanfan" post=412595 said:From a basketball standpoint, my view is that there are no structural problems that cannot be fixed by winning. The school definitely has some drawbacks in terms of facilities that - in combination with the fact that the program has been irrelevant for a couple of decades - make it an uphill battle to get players. However, it also has some positives (location, MSG). But if you build a winning program, they will come.
From an academic standpoint, SJU draws (1) students who don't qualify for admission to more competitive schools; (2) locals who don't have exposure to the wider world of college education; and (3) good students who can't afford to attend more competitive schools. That applicant pool results in a smaller segment of graduates who are capable or motivated to donate than is the case at, for example, Georgetown or Villanova. If SJU wanted to fix that it would have to put in a LOT of work and resources to upgrade its standing as a university. It clearly doesn't have the resources and to date has not had the innovation or vision to do so.
Whereas a new graduate who has not achieved career success yet is less able to contribute, that does not include large numbers of graduates who have achieved a better life and considerable economic success via their SJU degree.
In terms of basketball, I agree with you. Many schools that have had less resources and less to offer have done a far better job building winning programs than we have. Many schools with better facilities have done far worse than we have.