He is going to get another year. And they are not that far off. He has a solid core and two big time kids coming in next year in Adams and KA. He is also in the running for Bazz and Parker. Dan Guerrero his AD is a big supporter and so is the President of UCLA. Obviously there is moaning when UCLA has the type of year they have had plus you throw in what happened two years ago. But there is little chance he is let go after this year.
Bruce Weber at Illinois apparently is in trouble. Good coach but his AD did not exactly endorse him last week.
Well Weber has nobody of interest coming in.
Heard rumblings about South Carolina (nobody coming in of interest), ASU (Herbie just got extension), and Wake (big class coming in and just his 2nd year)
I don't see what other jobs could open and create recruiting waves.
Well Weber has nobody of interest coming in.
Heard rumblings about South Carolina (nobody coming in of interest), ASU (Herbie just got extension), and Wake (big class coming in and just his 2nd year)
I don't see what other jobs could open and create recruiting waves.
Stop being logical and simply fall prey to conjecture, rumor mongering and innuendo. Gosh!
Is there any reason we aren't going after Nerlens Noel?? I see that he is taking some unofficials to Providence and YouCon... He's a Northeast guy, why aren't we even bothering with him??
Is there any reason we aren't going after Nerlens Noel?? I see that he is taking some unofficials to Providence and YouCon... He's a Northeast guy, why aren't we even bothering with him??
Because he will be at Kentucky or Carolina next year. why waste time with him?
Howland is not getting fired.
I'll base Howland's firing on the fact that if they don't make the NCAAs, he will have missed the tournament two of the last three years -- one with a losing record and potentially a second if they tank the final two weeks.
UCLA is a different animal -- one that doesn't see the three straight Final Fours but will see the other six seasons around them (three no tournaments, none passed the second round of the tourney.
I'll base Howland's firing on the fact that if they don't make the NCAAs, he will have missed the tournament two of the last three years -- one with a losing record and potentially a second if they tank the final two weeks.
UCLA is a different animal -- one that doesn't see the three straight Final Fours but will see the other six seasons around them (three no tournaments, none passed the second round of the tourney.
I'll base Howland's firing on the fact that if they don't make the NCAAs, he will have missed the tournament two of the last three years -- one with a losing record and potentially a second if they tank the final two weeks.
UCLA is a different animal -- one that doesn't see the three straight Final Fours but will see the other six seasons around them (three no tournaments, none passed the second round of the tourney.
I understand that and again that does not mean he is getting fired. Dan Guerrero is not ready to fire him. And more importantly there is no obvious person to take over let alone has Howland's track record at two major BCS schools.
I understand the obvious "UCLA does not tolerate losing" angle. That doesn't mean they are completely impulsive either. Lavin was fired about 6 times before he actually was. And two of those 6 seasons under Howland were his first 2 seasons, rebuilding years in other words.
They just fired their HC in football after just 4 years. Neuheisal was a disaster and Guerrero knows if he fires Howland he might be next. They are not ready to pull the plug on Howland yet.
I'll base Howland's firing on the fact that if they don't make the NCAAs, he will have missed the tournament two of the last three years -- one with a losing record and potentially a second if they tank the final two weeks.
UCLA is a different animal -- one that doesn't see the three straight Final Fours but will see the other six seasons around them (three no tournaments, none passed the second round of the tourney.
I understand that and again that does not mean he is getting fired. Dan Guerrero is not ready to fire him. And more importantly there is no obvious person to take over let alone has Howland's track record at two major BCS schools.
I understand the obvious "UCLA does not tolerate losing" angle. That doesn't mean they are completely impulsive either. Lavin was fired about 6 times before he actually was. And two of those 6 seasons under Howland were his first 2 seasons, rebuilding years in other words.
They just fired their HC in football after just 4 years. Neuheisal was a disaster and Guerrero knows if he fires Howland he might be next. They are not ready to pull the plug on Howland yet.
They're building the slowest team in the west. You think UCLA was slow in the game against us? Kyle Anderson's nickname is "slo-mo". Have you seen Jordan Adams? He's one of the slower small forwards in the top 100. He's a very nice shooter off screens and creates space with crafty footwork, but is chubby and really not a SF that is going to beat people off the dribble. Their recruiting class is nice on paper but I think their choose of the type of kids they are recruiting is a bit off. Even if they don't fire Howland, the guys that they are adding won't increase their team speed nor athleticism at all. Neither Anderson nor Adams is a 't choose SJU great athlete. Both good ball players, but creating with the ball will still be a problem next year.