beast of the east
Active member
This was about as ho hum a loss as you could imagine - outcome never in doubt, unless you believe that crawling within 13 makes it a game.
I believe Mullin is a super competitive guy, and I also believe that when the outcome is already sealed, he gives up, and can't wait till the game is over. How else could you explain when all 5 of our guys decided not to chase a fast break when one of our guys launched an errant 3 very late, and not one of our guys made it to halfcourt? I would have put the last 5 guys on our bench in at point? Or the matador defense one of our guys with 4 fouls played when Providence took t to the hoop on him late, presumably to keep himself on the court to pad his stats.
You can look at the box score and try to pick out bright spots, but when your team gets tattooed 17 out of 18 Big East games, there usually isn't a warrior for us standing out as one of the best players on the floor. Some of those same guys with a decent box score had embarrassing turnovers trying to take the ball to the hoop, or launched long off the mark 3's with plenty of time on the clock when a basket could have brought us within 10 points.
There are a couple of guys to really like, and thankfully they will be back.
I just hope that going forward the staff coaches all 40 minutes hard, and takes our guys to task for not playing hard, smart, or unselfishly - no matter what the score.
Couldn't believe when I saw that...also don't like to see our guys walk back to the huddle during a timeout
Most of the time it takes at least 30 seconds or more into a timeout for a coach to join the huddle. Mullin usually shows no particular interest in being that guy, and he stands near the bench chatting with an assistant at length until casually sauntering to an unoccupied coach's seat in the huddle. On the floor, this team had no clear leader that the other players listened to and rallied around. The same is true with the coaching staff. Most coaches cannot say enough during a timeout. As soon as a timeout is called, they leap off the bench, gesture to players to hustle into the huddle, and subsequently get warned by refs by overstaying the 30 or 60 seconds.
Saying that our talent level was so low that even great coach couldn't coax more out of them is absurd in that t only contains a hint of truth. Maybe the outcomes wouldn't change much, but a great coach wouldn't tolerate players who couldn't hit a FT to shoot from 20, out of control drives to the hoop, or lazy defense. Yes, innately great players usually don't exhibit these behaviors, but to a large extent guys like ours required more in game coaching, not less.