(POST GAME) (MSG) Connecticut, Sun., Feb. 13, 12 Noon, FOX

Monte post=457720 said:
IDRAFT post=457714 said:
This will be unpopular here, facts can be hard to swallow. As to attendance.

Of course, the better the team the higher it will go. Thank you everyone for that ongoing insight! But the program is where it is at this time. And also, it's not 1960, it's 2022 and things change. For many fans (and recent alumni) of SJU going to MSG is not a perk it is a hassle. So, they stay home, or lose interest in the program. And as far as recruiting, does anyone seriously think a current 18-year-old kid cares about playing at MSG? You know what facts fly in the face of that? SJUs actual recruiting. 

With the MSG part of the schedule now completed we can look at all the attendance figures. Some things to consider about these numbers:

1. - MSG is conveniently located - for the other teams fans. More so than any other venue in the Big East. That adds to MSG figures.
2. - The Kansas game at UBS was NOT part of the season ticket package. 

Now some facts.

12/3 - Kansas - UBS - 9,769
12/18 - Pitt - MSG - 5,177
12/22 - Seton Hall - MSG - 6,692
1/16 - Georgetown - MSG - 5,161
2/8 - Villanova  - MSG - 9,712
2/13 - UCONN - MSG - 6,567

Hmm. The game with the highest attendance wasn't even included in the season ticket package, which is a VERY significant piece of the MSG numbers. Same non-25 team for all of these games so let's stop with that already.

SJU needs to move on and stop clinging to the past. The people pining for MSG mostly live in Florida and like the fact that the games there conjure up old memories for them as they watch on TV. The actual fans of the program primarily live in parts of the Metropolitan area where a game at MSG is just an added hassle. Why make it harder for them to attend when there is a better option for the fans and the University?

And I know that is a harsh statement for any fan who happens to live in certain parts of the area and MSG happens to be a much better choice for them. I get that. But the University has to look at the overall picture and shouldn't be scheduling games for the minority of fans. I'm sure there are graduates of Seton Hall who live in Nassau County now. For them Seton Hall usually plays a game at MSG every December. They play the rest in New Jersey except for the game we give them at MSG. 

If SJU is going to play any games at MSG they need to upgrade the OOC and play some of those games at MSG and see what happens. It will certainly be easier to get a home and home with a high-level program using MSG. Get the Big East games out of there as there are better options and they have to play wherever SJU schedules them. The school needs new fans, the ones they had dwindle every year.

Those new fans went to UBS - and the data is right above to see.


 
You make a valid case, but a few things:

-MSG attracts a much broad sector of fans, not just us old fans
-UBS will never have the cache that MSG has as a "home away from home" for us
-Using one game at UBS, and the first college game ever played there, is not nearly a large enough sample size to compare attendance to MSG. But we should schedule a few more games there next season instead of at CA, and see how we do
-I'm moving out of Manhattan in the next few months and will actually be closer to UBS then MSG, so I have no personal stake in whether or not we play games at MSG. 

I have no problem, as I mentioned, with us testing the waters a bit more at UBS, but I still think  MSG needs to be our primary home away from home. 
I have no vested stake either, I like going to MSG. Not suggesting you said otherwise, but I do want to put that out there. I agree with your highlighted point, one game is a small sample size, some experimenting is in order. And if they do the right thing and get a few more quality OOC games there would be more games to work with for both sites. We all agree nobody is going to either spot to watch Monmouth or Miss. Valley State.

 
 
Just my personal opinion, but I really feel like the most important factor about us playing home games at MSG, is how it adds to our brand. In a way, it helps us cling to some semblance of national relevance, even during these lean years of no success on that level. 
 
I seriously doubt Fans hate Wusu.  No one doubts his intensity , competitiveness , or Skills .   He has many attributes that are valuable to any team .,  But , he is and has been asked to play roles , not suited to those skills .  That’s a function of Posh’s injuries and not having a back up PG .  Dunn was able to fill that role last season and , he  could break down his defenders off the dribble .   This year we have no one to be the spot PG .       Wusu played a spark plug role last year , off the Bench and would do well in that role again . Coming in to the game against other team’s role players or , tired starters .        That’s another thing , didn’t Wusu have off season foot or ankle surgery ?   There is little doubt he doesn’t have the lift he had last year .  And , neither does Champ , who I believe may be playing hurt too .  His lift is way off from last year and he knows it .  He was able to get to the rim better last year and did have more quickness . He’s never been a blow by guy but , the drop off this year is more than just him not playing well .    His ability just hasn’t gone south , unless there is a reason .           This is a very poor shooting team . Not up to BE standards .  Last year, we had Cole , Moore , Earlington , GWill, and Champ who could hit 3’s a nd outside 2’s .   Not this year .   Smith hasn’t gotten off track , Coburn is in a slump at the worst time , when he’s getting more minutes . Wheeler is a decent but , streaky 3 shooter . And , like yesterday , he and Champ were like 11-34 or something like that on Shots . Not going to win with those numbers .                                             Nywie and Stanley are offensively challenged at this point in their development . There effort is admirable when they are in there .  Pinzon ‘s loss has been unfortunate . Let’s hope the young man recovers and can resume next season .                       
 
I’m going to disagree with IDRAFT re the UBS attendance. That game drew well because fans wanted to see the new arena and Kansas was a top opponent. If SJU plays Pitt , Geo, Vill , and Conn next season at UBS they will draw similar crowds that MSG drew. 
SJU is sinking even more than I thought and Mike Cragg has one of the toughest assignments in all of college basketball , trying to raise money and interest in a dormant program.
 
Another frustrating game which we could have won without and would have won with Posh.
 
Last edited:
I enjoy listening to the back and forth comments and support or criticism. I watch all the games and certainly pull for the Johnnie’s ……and always will! Go Redmen! 
 
My immediate observations from yesterday's game:
  1. The crowd was spirited (even without the UConn contingents) and seemed larger than it actually was; that said, the fact that St. John's fans did not turn out for the game is very disappointing
  2. I liked that the game plan was for Mathis and Wusu to not look for or settle for 3's; I liked that they and most of the team tried to get inside; the fact that UConn had a lot of blocks (and so did we) doesn't mean it wasn't a good game plan; it helped get Sanogo in foul trouble
  3. I see Wusu kind of like Earlington was in his sophomore year; still trying to figure out his role--shooter or not?  PG or not; of course, had Posh and Pinzon been healthier, much of these things he is being asked to do might be moot; he is a unique player whose contributions are often overlooked by his mistakes
  4. Wheeler, having the hot hand in outside shooting, just didn't find them dropping. 
As disappointed as I am in the loss, it was a fun game to be at.  While my hope that they finish 5th in the conference is now dashed, I see no reason not to hope that they make a run into the semifinals in the BE.
 
Last edited:
Room112 post=457728 said:
Just my personal opinion, but I really feel like the most important factor about us playing home games at MSG, is how it adds to our brand. In a way, it helps us cling to some semblance of national relevance, even during these lean years of no success on that level. 
Completely agree 112. Almost every Fox national and regional broadcast starts with a shot of Manhattan and the words "from the world's most famous arena....". Play more CA games at UBS, don't take away from MSG. If anything, add more marquee OOC games at MSG
 
I spoke to a coach friend about Wusu, asking if the lateral low post position (back to the basket strong but small power forward with quickness , Bernard King, Mark Aguirre, Adrian Dantley, Charles Barkley) could work for him and get him away from all the desperate straight line drives that get blocked.  His answer was that it might but that no one wants to teach that game, that running offense through a back to the basket point forward in the age of the 3 pointer is viewed as a non-winning approach.
 
I went back to the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 season for attendance numbers, with the following results:
2018-2019
CAL, Barclays           5,967
VCU, Barclays           5,453
Princeton, MSG        10,078
Georgetown, MSG    17,801
Providence, MSG      16,288
Villanove, MSG          19,812
Seton Hall, MSG        18,529

2019-2020
WVU, MSG                  7,281
DePaul, MSG               6,636
Seton Hall, MSG         10,428
Villanova, MSG           10,155
Xavier, MSG                14,465
Marquette, MSG            7,720 

So what has changed from this season compared to the the past 2 seasons. IMHO, fans are staying away mostly because of COVID. I think a lot fans got use to staying home last year (since they were not allowed to attend) and decided to stay home this year. I expect to see an increase in attendance next year. Not sure how much, because there still needs to be progress on the court.
 
If the cheapest ticket at MSG to see SJU is fifty five dollars good luck. To see a college basketball team that does not participate in March Madness and is struggling to remain in the top 100 teams fifty five dollars for what would be a bad seat is poor marketing.
 
RedStormRising post=457746 said:
I went back to the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 season for attendance numbers, with the following results:
2018-2019
CAL, Barclays           5,967
VCU, Barclays           5,453
Princeton, MSG        10,078
Georgetown, MSG    17,801
Providence, MSG      16,288
Villanove, MSG          19,812
Seton Hall, MSG        18,529

2019-2020
WVU, MSG                  7,281
DePaul, MSG               6,636
Seton Hall, MSG         10,428
Villanova, MSG           10,155
Xavier, MSG                14,465
Marquette, MSG            7,720 

So what has changed from this season compared to the the past 2 seasons. IMHO, fans are staying away mostly because of COVID. I think a lot fans got use to staying home last year (since they were not allowed to attend) and decided to stay home this year. I expect to see an increase in attendance next year. Not sure how much, because there still needs to be progress on the court.

i didn't renew my season tix for the last 2 seasons due to covid.  

if i can get my baby vaxxed this year, i'll renew.  
 
RedStormRising post=457746 said:
I went back to the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 season for attendance numbers, with the following results:
2018-2019
CAL, Barclays           5,967
VCU, Barclays           5,453
Princeton, MSG        10,078
Georgetown, MSG    17,801
Providence, MSG      16,288
Villanove, MSG          19,812
Seton Hall, MSG        18,529

2019-2020
WVU, MSG                  7,281
DePaul, MSG               6,636
Seton Hall, MSG         10,428
Villanova, MSG           10,155
Xavier, MSG                14,465
Marquette, MSG            7,720 

So what has changed from this season compared to the the past 2 seasons. IMHO, fans are staying away mostly because of COVID. I think a lot fans got use to staying home last year (since they were not allowed to attend) and decided to stay home this year. I expect to see an increase in attendance next year. Not sure how much, because there still needs to be progress on the court.

Don't forget, that 2018-2019 season, there was a ton of buzz around the program, and attendance was up significantly that year. That was Mullin's final year, and the year Ponds led the team to a 12-0 start. Say what you want about Mullin, but him as the coach gave the program a great talking point in the press that was able to draw in the average fan. We also had the exciting Shamorie Ponds, and during the year St. John's actually had some relevance that season.
 
Monte post=457739 said:
Room112 post=457728 said:
Just my personal opinion, but I really feel like the most important factor about us playing home games at MSG, is how it adds to our brand. In a way, it helps us cling to some semblance of national relevance, even during these lean years of no success on that level. 
Completely agree 112. Almost every Fox national and regional broadcast starts with a shot of Manhattan and the words "from the world's most famous arena....". Play more CA games at UBS, don't take away from MSG. If anything, add more marquee OOC games at MSG
I understand, but does anybody know the economics of our MSG games (legitimate question)? It can't be cheap and the athletic department has to be taking a pretty sizable loss on these games especially when we draw less than 10K people. I could be wrong though as I have no clue what the actual numbers look like. 
 
Mug Costanza post=457750 said:
Monte post=457739 said:
Room112 post=457728 said:
Just my personal opinion, but I really feel like the most important factor about us playing home games at MSG, is how it adds to our brand. In a way, it helps us cling to some semblance of national relevance, even during these lean years of no success on that level. 
Completely agree 112. Almost every Fox national and regional broadcast starts with a shot of Manhattan and the words "from the world's most famous arena....". Play more CA games at UBS, don't take away from MSG. If anything, add more marquee OOC games at MSG
I understand, but does anybody know the economics of our MSG games (legitimate question)? It can't be cheap and the athletic department has to be taking a pretty sizable loss on these games especially when we draw less than 10K people. I could be wrong though as I have no clue what the actual numbers look like. 

It has been shared on this board that we need around 10K attendance to break even. So that's why it appears the administration is strategically cutting back games there while we are down a bit. As Monte said, it would be a great idea to schedule games against premiere OOC teams at MSG.
 
Please post comments about Attendance in that thread for continuity purposes.
 
Monte post=457739 said:
Room112 post=457728 said:
Just my personal opinion, but I really feel like the most important factor about us playing home games at MSG, is how it adds to our brand. In a way, it helps us cling to some semblance of national relevance, even during these lean years of no success on that level. 
Completely agree 112. Almost every Fox national and regional broadcast starts with a shot of Manhattan and the words "from the world's most famous arena....". Play more CA games at UBS, don't take away from MSG. If anything, add more marquee OOC games at MSG

I agree with playing the marquee OOC games at MSG.  Perhaps we could then experiment with UBS by hosting UConn and Nova there.   Our core fan base does not live in Manhattan and I would make the case that the geographical heart of our base is much closer to UBS. 

MSG
Georgetown
Seton Hall
Providence
Marquee OOC
Marquee OOC  

UBS
UConn
Villanova




 
 
Last edited:
JohnnyFan post=457771 said:
Monte post=457739 said:
Room112 post=457728 said:
Just my personal opinion, but I really feel like the most important factor about us playing home games at MSG, is how it adds to our brand. In a way, it helps us cling to some semblance of national relevance, even during these lean years of no success on that level. 
Completely agree 112. Almost every Fox national and regional broadcast starts with a shot of Manhattan and the words "from the world's most famous arena....". Play more CA games at UBS, don't take away from MSG. If anything, add more marquee OOC games at MSG

I agree with playing the marquee OOC games at MSG.  Perhaps we could then experiment with UBS by hosting UConn and Nova there.   Our core fan base does not live in Manhattan and I would make the case that the geographical heart of our base is much closer to UBS. 

MSG
Georgetown
Seton Hall
Providence
Marquee OOC
Marquee OOC  

UBS
UConn
Villanova





 
Just replied to this post in the attendance thread 
 
Manhattan1 post=457752 said:
I believe they also raised ticket prices after the 18-19 season 

tell me how they have the nerve to charge us 100 a seat or more on our season tickets for contribution to the school athletic program when they have fielded a team that the school should pay us to watch
 
 
Back
Top