I have no vested stake either, I like going to MSG. Not suggesting you said otherwise, but I do want to put that out there. I agree with your highlighted point, one game is a small sample size, some experimenting is in order. And if they do the right thing and get a few more quality OOC games there would be more games to work with for both sites. We all agree nobody is going to either spot to watch Monmouth or Miss. Valley State.Monte post=457720 said:You make a valid case, but a few things:IDRAFT post=457714 said:This will be unpopular here, facts can be hard to swallow. As to attendance.
Of course, the better the team the higher it will go. Thank you everyone for that ongoing insight! But the program is where it is at this time. And also, it's not 1960, it's 2022 and things change. For many fans (and recent alumni) of SJU going to MSG is not a perk it is a hassle. So, they stay home, or lose interest in the program. And as far as recruiting, does anyone seriously think a current 18-year-old kid cares about playing at MSG? You know what facts fly in the face of that? SJUs actual recruiting.
With the MSG part of the schedule now completed we can look at all the attendance figures. Some things to consider about these numbers:
1. - MSG is conveniently located - for the other teams fans. More so than any other venue in the Big East. That adds to MSG figures.
2. - The Kansas game at UBS was NOT part of the season ticket package.
Now some facts.
12/3 - Kansas - UBS - 9,769
12/18 - Pitt - MSG - 5,177
12/22 - Seton Hall - MSG - 6,692
1/16 - Georgetown - MSG - 5,161
2/8 - Villanova - MSG - 9,712
2/13 - UCONN - MSG - 6,567
Hmm. The game with the highest attendance wasn't even included in the season ticket package, which is a VERY significant piece of the MSG numbers. Same non-25 team for all of these games so let's stop with that already.
SJU needs to move on and stop clinging to the past. The people pining for MSG mostly live in Florida and like the fact that the games there conjure up old memories for them as they watch on TV. The actual fans of the program primarily live in parts of the Metropolitan area where a game at MSG is just an added hassle. Why make it harder for them to attend when there is a better option for the fans and the University?
And I know that is a harsh statement for any fan who happens to live in certain parts of the area and MSG happens to be a much better choice for them. I get that. But the University has to look at the overall picture and shouldn't be scheduling games for the minority of fans. I'm sure there are graduates of Seton Hall who live in Nassau County now. For them Seton Hall usually plays a game at MSG every December. They play the rest in New Jersey except for the game we give them at MSG.
If SJU is going to play any games at MSG they need to upgrade the OOC and play some of those games at MSG and see what happens. It will certainly be easier to get a home and home with a high-level program using MSG. Get the Big East games out of there as there are better options and they have to play wherever SJU schedules them. The school needs new fans, the ones they had dwindle every year.
Those new fans went to UBS - and the data is right above to see.
-MSG attracts a much broad sector of fans, not just us old fans
-UBS will never have the cache that MSG has as a "home away from home" for us
-Using one game at UBS, and the first college game ever played there, is not nearly a large enough sample size to compare attendance to MSG. But we should schedule a few more games there next season instead of at CA, and see how we do
-I'm moving out of Manhattan in the next few months and will actually be closer to UBS then MSG, so I have no personal stake in whether or not we play games at MSG.
I have no problem, as I mentioned, with us testing the waters a bit more at UBS, but I still think MSG needs to be our primary home away from home.