Nov 8, 2016 - The lesser of two evils?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I totally get that presidents bring in their own people but I dont like one bit this whole Preet Bharara thing ( I have no problem with replacing the other 45 ). I dont like what Trump and Sessions are doing here. Aside from the fact that Trump met with him months ago and asked him to stay on but Preet was doing a great job and draining the cesspool of NY politics along with many other things. This is the type of guy that Trump should be wanting to surround himself with

Part of me really wonders what this fox news stuff and Hannity had to do with it

I think Bharara is collateral damage for the decision which IMO is in part a reaction to the slow rolling and obstruction to confirming Trump nominees and the never ending playing of the false Russian narrative, just speculation on my part.
 
The main question still lingers though why does conservatism as an ideology allows scientific knowledge to often co-exist with non-scientific or "superstitious" knowledge, while the leftist ideology has entrenched this epistemological break to the annihilation of traditional knowledge and superstition, and towards the precipitous slide into mass murder .... ?

Conservatives trust the wisdom that has been accumulated over the course of human experience. That includes both science and religion. Progressives believe that utopia is just around the next corner so it doesn't matter what's in the rear view mirror.

Agreed but this entails among other things seriously constructed blinkers, historical revisions and a solid propaganda machine to boot...
 
I totally get that presidents bring in their own people but I dont like one bit this whole Preet Bharara thing ( I have no problem with replacing the other 45 ). I dont like what Trump and Sessions are doing here. Aside from the fact that Trump met with him months ago and asked him to stay on but Preet was doing a great job and draining the cesspool of NY politics along with many other things. This is the type of guy that Trump should be wanting to surround himself with

Part of me really wonders what this fox news stuff and Hannity had to do with it

Back in NYC after a month Dr MJ ... so perhaps whenever you and your partner venture into the city let me know and we will try to grab some "desi" (authentic Pakistani) food. Perhaps Mr. Fun would like to join as well? Others?
 
I totally get that presidents bring in their own people but I dont like one bit this whole Preet Bharara thing ( I have no problem with replacing the other 45 ). I dont like what Trump and Sessions are doing here. Aside from the fact that Trump met with him months ago and asked him to stay on but Preet was doing a great job and draining the cesspool of NY politics along with many other things. This is the type of guy that Trump should be wanting to surround himself with

Part of me really wonders what this fox news stuff and Hannity had to do with it

Back in NYC after a month Dr MJ ... so perhaps whenever you and your partner venture into the city let me know and we will try to grab some "desi" (authentic Pakistani) food. Perhaps Mr. Fun would like to join as well? Others?
Ok cool. They are still shooting down in Lima but when she gets back will let you know for sure
 
I totally get that presidents bring in their own people but I dont like one bit this whole Preet Bharara thing ( I have no problem with replacing the other 45 ). I dont like what Trump and Sessions are doing here. Aside from the fact that Trump met with him months ago and asked him to stay on but Preet was doing a great job and draining the cesspool of NY politics along with many other things. This is the type of guy that Trump should be wanting to surround himself with

Part of me really wonders what this fox news stuff and Hannity had to do with it

Back in NYC after a month Dr MJ ... so perhaps whenever you and your partner venture into the city let me know and we will try to grab some "desi" (authentic Pakistani) food. Perhaps Mr. Fun would like to join as well? Others?
Ok cool. They are still shooting down in Lima but when she gets back will let you know for sure

Sounds good to me. Time to work on the jet lag...
 
Perhaps Mr. Fun would like to join as well? Others?

This is the third dinner invitation I've gotten in the last month. Evidently I'm going to have to rethink my approach.

Well just to inform your approach, the cuisine is not so much akin to either the perpetrators of Pearl Harbor or Warsaw, if indeed, your patriotism or good conscious precludes such invites. We were colonized by the Brits, and we thank our lucky stars daily that it wasn't the Germans and Japanese. I mean imagine the efficiency ... well in our case on how we prepare curry :)
 
I am sure I have never seen this depth of deprivation the US Media reach before ... I am not sure whether DJT and his administration can drain this proverbial swamp but it is a key institution for a republic to return to being a vibrant democracy.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/15/rachel-maddow-done-her-own-mouth/

http://observer.com/2017/03/trump-resign-preet-attorneys/
his tax returns weren't even that bad. He had an effective tax rate of around 25%. I dont have 1 wealthy client who has an effective tax rate of what the highest bracket is. They are all in the 20s
 
I am sure I have never seen this depth of deprivation the US Media reach before ... I am not sure whether DJT and his administration can drain this proverbial swamp but it is a key institution for a republic to return to being a vibrant democracy.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/15/rachel-maddow-done-her-own-mouth/

http://observer.com/2017/03/trump-resign-preet-attorneys/
his tax returns weren't even that bad. He had an effective tax rate of around 25%. I dont have 1 wealthy client who has an effective tax rate of what the highest bracket is. They are all in the 20s

Obama I believe had an effective tax rate of 19%, while Sanders had 13%. Go figure ...That means that both relatively and absolutely Trump paid more taxes.
 
No one should care what Trump's effective tax rate was, whatever he paid he no doubt did so by using the loopholes available to him, as we all do. The only reason folks paying attention want to see his tax returns is to analyze the sources of his income to determine if there are any conflicts of interest, as if that even mattered any more.
 
No one should care what Trump's effective tax rate was, whatever he paid he no doubt did so by using the loopholes available to him, as we all do. The only reason folks paying attention want to see his tax returns is to analyze the sources of his income to determine if there are any conflicts of interest, as if that even mattered any more.

Precisely ... they were looking for the letters KGB ... but couldnt find them.
 
No one should care what Trump's effective tax rate was, whatever he paid he no doubt did so by using the loopholes available to him, as we all do. The only reason folks paying attention want to see his tax returns is to analyze the sources of his income to determine if there are any conflicts of interest, as if that even mattered any more.

Precisely ... they were looking for the letters KGB ... but couldnt find them.

All they got was a 2 page summary from 2005. Summaries don't' include source of income.

"Still, major questions remain. The two pages of documents offer only a limited picture of the president's financial status 12 years ago. They do not include extensive statements, which would reveal more information about how exactly Trump had made so much money at the time, or how exactly he could claim a $103 million loss. The new documents also do nothing to clarify his current financial standing, debt structure or business ties."
 
No one should care what Trump's effective tax rate was, whatever he paid he no doubt did so by using the loopholes available to him, as we all do. The only reason folks paying attention want to see his tax returns is to analyze the sources of his income to determine if there are any conflicts of interest, as if that even mattered any more.

Precisely ... they were looking for the letters KGB ... but couldnt find them.

All they got was a 2 page summary from 2005. Summaries don't' include source of income.

"Still, major questions remain. The two pages of documents offer only a limited picture of the president's financial status 12 years ago. They do not include extensive statements, which would reveal more information about how exactly Trump had made so much money at the time, or how exactly he could claim a $103 million loss. The new documents also do nothing to clarify his current financial standing, debt structure or business ties."
in other words Maddow wasted everyones time last night :)
 
No one should care what Trump's effective tax rate was, whatever he paid he no doubt did so by using the loopholes available to him, as we all do. The only reason folks paying attention want to see his tax returns is to analyze the sources of his income to determine if there are any conflicts of interest, as if that even mattered any more.

Precisely ... they were looking for the letters KGB ... but couldnt find them.

All they got was a 2 page summary from 2005. Summaries don't' include source of income.

"Still, major questions remain. The two pages of documents offer only a limited picture of the president's financial status 12 years ago. They do not include extensive statements, which would reveal more information about how exactly Trump had made so much money at the time, or how exactly he could claim a $103 million loss. The new documents also do nothing to clarify his current financial standing, debt structure or business ties."
in other words Maddow wasted everyones time last night :)

Not mine, I was watching Legion.
 
PS I should have made that recommendation when you were looking for something to watch yesterday.
 
No one should care what Trump's effective tax rate was, whatever he paid he no doubt did so by using the loopholes available to him, as we all do. The only reason folks paying attention want to see his tax returns is to analyze the sources of his income to determine if there are any conflicts of interest, as if that even mattered any more.

Precisely ... they were looking for the letters KGB ... but couldnt find them.

All they got was a 2 page summary from 2005. Summaries don't' include source of income.

"Still, major questions remain. The two pages of documents offer only a limited picture of the president's financial status 12 years ago. They do not include extensive statements, which would reveal more information about how exactly Trump had made so much money at the time, or how exactly he could claim a $103 million loss. The new documents also do nothing to clarify his current financial standing, debt structure or business ties."
in other words Maddow wasted everyones time last night :)

Not mine, I was watching Legion.

Hilarious MJ and Austour. And exactly, where and when did it all go horribly wrong for the mainstream media that there is not even a simple recognition that 2 pages mean absolutely nothing or signal exactly the opposite. Bring back the National Enquirer, if it ever went out of circulation. What degradation ... if one does a cursory look at mainstream media (CNN, MSNBC, ABC and other outlets) particularly over the last year or so, ironically enough FOX IMHO comes out as the least partisan.
 
No one should care what Trump's effective tax rate was, whatever he paid he no doubt did so by using the loopholes available to him, as we all do. The only reason folks paying attention want to see his tax returns is to analyze the sources of his income to determine if there are any conflicts of interest, as if that even mattered any more.

Precisely ... they were looking for the letters KGB ... but couldnt find them.

All they got was a 2 page summary from 2005. Summaries don't' include source of income.

"Still, major questions remain. The two pages of documents offer only a limited picture of the president's financial status 12 years ago. They do not include extensive statements, which would reveal more information about how exactly Trump had made so much money at the time, or how exactly he could claim a $103 million loss. The new documents also do nothing to clarify his current financial standing, debt structure or business ties."
in other words Maddow wasted everyones time last night :)

Not mine, I was watching Legion.

Hilarious MJ and Austour. And exactly, where and when did it all go horribly wrong for the mainstream media that there is not even a simple recognition that 2 pages mean absolutely nothing or signal exactly the opposite. Bring back the National Enquirer, if it ever went out of circulation. What degradation ... if one does a cursory look at mainstream media (CNN, MSNBC, ABC and other outlets) particularly over the last year or so, ironically enough FOX IMHO comes out as the least partisan.

Shep Smith maybe. But no. The biggest problem not just on this board, but generally, is that a lot of folks don't know the difference between commentary and journalism.

But to be clear, I'm not going to get too wiretapped over anything anymore. Just waiting it all out while trying to do my part.
 
No one should care what Trump's effective tax rate was, whatever he paid he no doubt did so by using the loopholes available to him, as we all do. The only reason folks paying attention want to see his tax returns is to analyze the sources of his income to determine if there are any conflicts of interest, as if that even mattered any more.

Precisely ... they were looking for the letters KGB ... but couldnt find them.

All they got was a 2 page summary from 2005. Summaries don't' include source of income.

"Still, major questions remain. The two pages of documents offer only a limited picture of the president's financial status 12 years ago. They do not include extensive statements, which would reveal more information about how exactly Trump had made so much money at the time, or how exactly he could claim a $103 million loss. The new documents also do nothing to clarify his current financial standing, debt structure or business ties."
in other words Maddow wasted everyones time last night :)

Not mine, I was watching Legion.

Hilarious MJ and Austour. And exactly, where and when did it all go horribly wrong for the mainstream media that there is not even a simple recognition that 2 pages mean absolutely nothing or signal exactly the opposite. Bring back the National Enquirer, if it ever went out of circulation. What degradation ... if one does a cursory look at mainstream media (CNN, MSNBC, ABC and other outlets) particularly over the last year or so, ironically enough FOX IMHO comes out as the least partisan.

Shep Smith maybe. But no. The biggest problem not just on this board, but generally, is that a lot of folks don't know the difference between commentary and journalism.

But to be clear, I'm not going to get too wiretapped over anything anymore. Just waiting it all out while trying to do my part.

Point taken. Illustratively, I call this an example of evidence-based journalism:

And on the surveillance issue, if the server in Trump Tower can be easily surveiled I do not want to know what they got on all of us through redmen.com... hehehe
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top