He’s out of his mind.You keep saying we’re in play for a one seed. We aren’t. Accept it.
He’s out of his mind.You keep saying we’re in play for a one seed. We aren’t. Accept it.
The teams in front of us have high level games left. If they lose one it won’t hurt their metrics. We are not getting a 1 seed. I think the highest we get is the first 3 seed.We have a chance with teams in front of us losing multiple games. Accept that!!!
Alabama hanging 111 on a ranked team put a nail in that coffin.Prob not auburn and duke. But we can def pass those other teams if that get multiple losses down the stretch here.
And as you saw w/ florida tonight, that is very possible.
Keep the faulith buddy. Still a long ways to go.
The selection committee hates the Big East this year and our resume isn’t the strongest compared to the other teams at the top. So I think they will end up a 2 or 3 seed even if they win out. I’m fine with either just want to avoid being the 4 seed and the top of the bracket.
Even if those teams take multiple Ls, we don’t have enough (or any) opportunities to collect additional top 10-15 wins. 2 seed if we win out.Prob not auburn and duke. But we can def pass those other teams if that get multiple losses down the stretch here.
And as you saw w/ florida tonight, that is very possible.
Keep the faulith buddy. Still a long ways to go.
Florida losing helps Alabama and Tennessee. Doesn't affect us unless they lose the next three or four in a row.Florida and Iowa State lost tonight where does that put us?
Bama's last 3 games are all against top 5 teams-Florida, Tennessee and Auburn ending a string of 7 straight ranked opponents.Florida losing helps Alabama and Tennessee. Doesn't affect us unless they lose the next three or four in a row.
Iowa St. loss gives us breathing room.
just how we have seen that Conf Tourney outcomes dont play too-much of a factor (unless youre a bid-stealer)- i think the committee is fairly locked in on teams prior to....Bama's last 3 games are all against top 5 teams-Florida, Tennessee and Auburn ending a string of 7 straight ranked opponents.
So essentially we all need to be rooting against teams like Michigan State, Iowa State, Texas Tech, Wisconsin, Texas A&Mjust how we have seen that Conf Tourney outcomes dont play too-much of a factor (unless youre a bid-stealer)- i think the committee is fairly locked in on teams prior to....
think the Top 6 seeds for the Tourney will be a mix of Auburn/Duke/Bama/Fla/Tenn/Houston.... no matter how the reg season shakes out...
So there are 2 #2 seeds up for grabs... and We only get one of em if we win out.
So essentially we all need to be rooting against teams like Michigan State, Iowa State, Texas Tech, Wisconsin, Texas A&M
This is a good sample.
Michigan state should not be a higher seed than us. Their resume does not stand out to me as being a 2 seed over us at this point.
This is a good sample.
This is a good sample.
Am I reading this correctly?
Am I reading this correctly? Lunardi has St. John's as the top rated 4 seed and yet he has us going out West. The bracket regions should be St. John's in the East, Arizona in the West and Michigan in the Midwest. In this scenario, Michigan St. would have to be moved to another region.
Yeah Lunardi sucks. He's rated 118 on bracketmatrix.Pay no attention to that clown. The committee put us as a 4 seed the other week. Since then we've gone 3-0 including wins over Creighton and Uconn. Lunardi hasn't moved us an inch.
this Butler road game is currently one NET spot from being a Q1...?.... Butler is a borderline Q3/Q2 game, and Seton Hall is Q4...