Mike Anderson
- Thread starter mkras99
- Start date
- Status
Per Wikipedia:
"Anderson is one of just 4 current Division I head coaches with 15+ years of experience and no losing seasons, along with Mark Few, Tom Izzo and Roy Williams."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Anderson_(basketball)
We could change that for him pretty quickly
"Anderson is one of just 4 current Division I head coaches with 15+ years of experience and no losing seasons, along with Mark Few, Tom Izzo and Roy Williams."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Anderson_(basketball)
We could change that for him pretty quickly
Candidates like Anderson are reasons why you leave a competent AD, like Cragg alone.
And let's face it, this is Cragg doing his best to find hope among the wreckage. I am guessing here, but I doubt the other two would know anything about Anderson.
Maybe a solid move like this, is the first sign that the BOT actually took notes from the Repole interview, and they are allowing Cragg to do the work he was hired to do.
Here's to hope.
And let's face it, this is Cragg doing his best to find hope among the wreckage. I am guessing here, but I doubt the other two would know anything about Anderson.
Maybe a solid move like this, is the first sign that the BOT actually took notes from the Repole interview, and they are allowing Cragg to do the work he was hired to do.
Here's to hope.
Yeah, this guy falls under the category of "no way in hell would I support him" at this time last week, but is someone who is looking pretty good now.
Pretty much how most of you on here feel about Cluess (although, you all know I supported his candidacy from the start).
Pretty much how most of you on here feel about Cluess (although, you all know I supported his candidacy from the start).
Moose
Well-known member
[quote="SJU1512" post=343908]Per Wikipedia:
"Anderson is one of just 4 current Division I head coaches with 15+ years of experience and no losing seasons, along with Mark Few, Tom Izzo and Roy Williams."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Anderson_(basketball)
We could change that for him pretty quickly[/quote]
Well no chance he comes with next year on the horizon
"Anderson is one of just 4 current Division I head coaches with 15+ years of experience and no losing seasons, along with Mark Few, Tom Izzo and Roy Williams."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Anderson_(basketball)
We could change that for him pretty quickly
[/quote]Well no chance he comes with next year on the horizon
classof2010
Well-known member
I’m done with this program this nothing to do with basketball. You guys giving Gempesaw and Olivia the ammunition.
Moose
Well-known member
[quote="kranmars" post=343910]Candidates like Anderson are reasons why you leave a competent AD, like Cragg alone.
And let's face it, this is Cragg doing his best to find hope among the wreckage. I am guessing here, but I doubt the other two would know anything about Anderson.
Maybe a solid move like this, is the first sign that the BOT actually took notes from the Repole interview, and they are allowing Cragg to do the work he was hired to do.
Here's to hope.[/quote]
Well Oliva does watch the NCAA tournament. He saw Moser last year. I guess he didn't watch this year.
And let's face it, this is Cragg doing his best to find hope among the wreckage. I am guessing here, but I doubt the other two would know anything about Anderson.
Maybe a solid move like this, is the first sign that the BOT actually took notes from the Repole interview, and they are allowing Cragg to do the work he was hired to do.
Here's to hope.[/quote]
Well Oliva does watch the NCAA tournament. He saw Moser last year. I guess he didn't watch this year.
[quote="SJU61982" post=343912]Yeah, this guy falls under the category of "no way in hell would I support him" at this time last week, but is someone who is looking pretty good now.
Pretty much how most of you on here feel about Cluess (although, you all know I supported his candidacy from the start).[/quote]
Never felt that way about Cluess and don’t know how you could put someone like Anderson in the category of “would have never supported him.”
Pretty much how most of you on here feel about Cluess (although, you all know I supported his candidacy from the start).[/quote]
Never felt that way about Cluess and don’t know how you could put someone like Anderson in the category of “would have never supported him.”
Last edited:
[quote="SJU1512" post=343908]Per Wikipedia:
"Anderson is one of just 4 current Division I head coaches with 15+ years of experience and no losing seasons, along with Mark Few, Tom Izzo and Roy Williams."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Anderson_(basketball)
We could change that for him pretty quickly[/quote]
Ha! Honestly, I think you'd see kids stay on board, if he accepts the job.
I once had a brief conversation with him at the Peach Jam. Seems like a pretty, cool dude, and a personality that resonates well with most kids.
Agree, mkras..... The heck with those local shysters.
"Anderson is one of just 4 current Division I head coaches with 15+ years of experience and no losing seasons, along with Mark Few, Tom Izzo and Roy Williams."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Anderson_(basketball)
We could change that for him pretty quickly
[/quote]Ha! Honestly, I think you'd see kids stay on board, if he accepts the job.
I once had a brief conversation with him at the Peach Jam. Seems like a pretty, cool dude, and a personality that resonates well with most kids.
Agree, mkras..... The heck with those local shysters.
I'll take him.
classof2010
Well-known member
This not Craggs hire he is out of here.
"Anderson was paid $2.55 million annually before bonuses, which ranked 39th in the latest USA Today database of basketball coaching salaries....."
[URL]https://www.arkansasonline.com...ires-mike-anderson-basketball-coach/?breaking[/URL]
[URL]https://www.arkansasonline.com...ires-mike-anderson-basketball-coach/?breaking[/URL]
[quote="MJDinkins" post=343917][quote="SJU1512" post=343908]Per Wikipedia:
"Anderson is one of just 4 current Division I head coaches with 15+ years of experience and no losing seasons, along with Mark Few, Tom Izzo and Roy Williams."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Anderson_(basketball)
We could change that for him pretty quickly[/quote]
Ha! Honestly, I think you'd see kids stay on board, if he accepts the job.
I once had a brief conversation with him at the Peach Jam. Seems like a pretty, cool dude, and a personality that resonates well with most kids.
Agree, mkras..... The heck with those local shysters.[/quote]
Oh, I agree completely re: Anderson MJD. An incredible candidate for any program generally. At this particular juncture for SJU would seem more like a walk-off grand slam down 3 with 2 outs in a Game 7 if he gets hired!
"Anderson is one of just 4 current Division I head coaches with 15+ years of experience and no losing seasons, along with Mark Few, Tom Izzo and Roy Williams."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Anderson_(basketball)
We could change that for him pretty quickly
[/quote]Ha! Honestly, I think you'd see kids stay on board, if he accepts the job.
I once had a brief conversation with him at the Peach Jam. Seems like a pretty, cool dude, and a personality that resonates well with most kids.
Agree, mkras..... The heck with those local shysters.[/quote]
Oh, I agree completely re: Anderson MJD. An incredible candidate for any program generally. At this particular juncture for SJU would seem more like a walk-off grand slam down 3 with 2 outs in a Game 7 if he gets hired!
Last edited:
[quote="SJU61982" post=343912]Yeah, this guy falls under the category of "no way in hell would I support him" at this time last week, but is someone who is looking pretty good now.
Pretty much how most of you on here feel about Cluess (although, you all know I supported his candidacy from the start).[/quote]
UAB winning %: .685
Missouri winning %: .661
Arkansas winning %: .624
No way in hell would you support him?
Pretty much how most of you on here feel about Cluess (although, you all know I supported his candidacy from the start).[/quote]
UAB winning %: .685
Missouri winning %: .661
Arkansas winning %: .624
No way in hell would you support him?
[quote="P Simmons" post=343916][quote="SJU61982" post=343912]Yeah, this guy falls under the category of "no way in hell would I support him" at this time last week, but is someone who is looking pretty good now.
Pretty much how most of you on here feel about Cluess (although, you all know I supported his candidacy from the start).[/quote]
Never felt that way about Cluess and don’t know how you could put someone like Anderson in the category of “would have never supported him.”[/quote]
Well, that was over the top. It was for point of emphasis. I just meant that, if his name was floated last week, I would have rolled my eyes, and thought that maybe we could have done better. I mean, the guy was just fired last month. That would have been a definite turn-off for me, in the beginning (although Arkansas is another program that thinks they're much bigger then they are - that program really was Nolan Richardson. Hasn't been the same there, since he was forced out).
And, I didn't mean you specifically WRT to Cluess. There were, however, many fans on here who were opposed to hiring him, when the search first started.
Pretty much how most of you on here feel about Cluess (although, you all know I supported his candidacy from the start).[/quote]
Never felt that way about Cluess and don’t know how you could put someone like Anderson in the category of “would have never supported him.”[/quote]
Well, that was over the top. It was for point of emphasis. I just meant that, if his name was floated last week, I would have rolled my eyes, and thought that maybe we could have done better. I mean, the guy was just fired last month. That would have been a definite turn-off for me, in the beginning (although Arkansas is another program that thinks they're much bigger then they are - that program really was Nolan Richardson. Hasn't been the same there, since he was forced out).
And, I didn't mean you specifically WRT to Cluess. There were, however, many fans on here who were opposed to hiring him, when the search first started.
Last edited:
- Status