Mike Zaun wrote: Also agree with a lot except the expectation. Last year after LoVett went down, the NIT was the expectation. This year we replace tiny LoVett with a 6'5 5* guard already proven from Auburn. Upgrades in rebounds, size, and overall talent. Not only do we have tons of talent, but we also have a lot of experience. IMO the NIT would mean poor coaching, poor chemistry (but you can attribute that to coaching too), or a significant injury. It's NCAA's or bust boys. That's more than fair for this team.
Mike, we often disagree, but I totally agree that anything less than NCAA this year (barring a major injury) would be a miss for this group. Aside from talent upgrade and good experience at Div 1 level, the team has much more depth. Coach, in a pre-season interview, emphasized that some of close losses last year were result of fatigue and guys playing too many minutes. Team has depth to avoid that problem this year so long as we use it. I am glad we have soft non-conference schedule though; I expect team to get much better as year goes on as melding this kind of talent can take a little time.