tom in salem
Well-known member
Well, the easy part of the schedule is over. We have been very consistent over the course of 7 games (yes I count exhibitions) and that is we hit the court totally unprepared for our opponent.
Tonight, against the lowest ranked team on the schedule we hardly looked focused on defense and, as usual, disorganized on offense.
Now I know some here will fall back on the low IQ mantra when looking at our players and a couple will obviously not be Rhodes Scholar candidates but it begs the question: when you are the worst shooting 3 point team in the universe, why is coach allowing Harrison 11 attempts while also missing most every type of shot he took for most of 30 minutes? Is it part of his recovery and redemption process to be a one man offense. Three starters - Phil, Primo and Sampson shot a combined 3 - 19 while Harrison alone took 19 shots. Of course, after 35 minutes of forced shots and 28 footers he hit a couple of 3s but it all looks so helter skelter.
Again, was the plan to have Sanchez only take 3 shots from 20 feet? Yes, Lavin finally sat mi non comprende but his absence was mostly on the court where he seems to have no position assigned since, according to Lavin, he can play 4 positions. Unfortunately, he plays them all without much passion.
Again, our formidable front line was rendered useless by whatever offense Lavin Wood was running against a small and less talented team.
In making comparisons with common opponents it appears Monmouth, who played us even for 37 minutes lost to our next opponent by 32 points.
With the many Penn State alums in NYC I see them having the home court advantage, come out more motivated, hit their 3s, and we lose another game to a BIG opponent.
Why? Because we will take too many 3s, Harrison will think he is the offense and Primo will no comprende his role on the team. Finally, Phil Greene will continue to have the ball in his hands on offense and we will use 30 seconds to get the ball to a shooter......those shooters being only Harrison, Greene and Sampson while the rest of the team is disenfranchised.
This is an outstanding post. I'll have to re-read "The Best and the Brightest"...about all those scholars who somehow got us mired in Viet Nam. We brought in the best and brightest coaches out there along with some of the best players, and we're mired with no offense (didn't the announcer say Longwood was allowing 81 ppg) and a defense that solely depends on blocked shots. This is all well and good against mid and low majors...but I'd be shocked if works against the big boys.
For the first time, I'm glad the Big East has become mid-major. Otherwise, we'd be looking at a typical Norm Roberts season, albiet with far better players.
Georgetown, Marquette, Villanova, Butler, Creighton, and Providence are all probably going to be tournament teams. Hardly a "mid-major".
+ Xavier.