DLo posts a picture of redmen.com post bashing him

Hopefully this will stop certain posters from taking shots at the team, the coach, and the players with every post. They read the site, and if I was a player and read some of the crap posted by our fan base, I might consider transferring too.

Oh lord have mercy with this sanctimonious stuff. And if you considered transferring to another high-major or even most mid-to-low major schools, guess what?? THEY ALL HAVE MESSAGE BOARDS TOO! Iona has a message board. As does Fordham. As does Hofstra. As does Manhattan College. Gimme a break with the players-getting-their-feelings-hurt stuff. Every high major school has a message board and we don't read about that nonsense.

If a player REALLY is effected enough by a message board post that they consider transferring, then they aren't mentally or emotionally tough. Because 99.999% of the players at this level deal with the same stuff and don't consider bailing.

Oh give me a freaking break. A deciding factor in choosing a school for many kids is the fan base. Our fan base in all honestly has been pathetic, especially on the internet. How many other programs rip their leading scorer the way Harrison gets ripped on here? The answer is not many. We should appreciate what we have in Harrison. If kids are reading these boards and see nothing but "Lavin is the worst coach in america" "We recruit athletes not basketball players" "Players don't develop under Lavin" "Harrison is a punk," and countless others I could quote, they may have serious doubts about this fan base and rightfully so. There are many fan bases that would love to have our players, and love to have Steve Lavin recruiting top 100 kids every single year.

Stop pretending like every high major school berates their players like we do. It's simply not true, We go overboard. Your job as a fan is to support the team. You'd think the known fact that our players read these boards would be enough for you to calm down a bit with ridiculing the players.

This just isn't true. I covered basketball recruiting for a couple of years, and am friends with the advisors and coaches that surround a number of top-tier players.

I have a fairly good picture of how recruiting works. For top-75/100 talent, "fanbases" play such a tiny part in the recruitment of a prospect. You are fantasizing the process. It is about who gets guys to the league, where is there open playing time, and deep, wideranging politics that go into recruiting and so much more that 95% of the time come way WAY before fanbases, ESPECIALLY as it pertains to "message boards". Its just not at all a significant factor in the process. With that said, yes it is read by those around programs and those around elite players, but they do not play factors in the process.

I also read the message boards of other schools from time-to-time and yes the rhetoric used is very similar. Stop thinking that we're special in how we "go after" players and coaches. Its simply not true. This happens at nearly every high-major school. In fact, the high-achieving schools are often the ones that are the most brutal.

Again, every high-major program has a message board in which there are sharp critics. Every player has had to deal with them. If a player really chooses that he has to transfer because of whats said about dozens or hundreds of players a year on message boards, then hes simply not mentally or emotionally tough.

Its actually insulting to our players to think that they can't handle a situation like this message board without breaking down to a point in which they'd think about transferring.

I never said it was the most important factor in recruiting. I understand NBA potential is way higher. Regardless, it is a factor, apparently we differ in opinion on how much of a factor.

But, if I'm a player playing my heart out for a school and read my schools two top fan forums, and read nothing but negative garbage and personal attacks on me, my teammates and coach, I could easily see how that could be disheartening. It doesn't mean I'm mentally weak. It's just natural. I'm also not saying it's the only reason players consider transferring, obviously not. But it sure as hell doesn't help.

I've read other schools message boards, you are not going to convince me that they are just as bad as us. It's not true. On here and JJ, the boards are flooded by negative posters who ridicule anyone who posts anything positive about the team/coach/certain players. I would say the majority of posts are taking some sort of shot at the team. That does not happen everywhere.
 
I've read other schools message boards, you are not going to convince me that they are just as bad as us. It's not true. On here and JJ, the boards are flooded by negative posters who ridicule anyone who posts anything positive about the team/coach/certain players. I would say the majority of posts are taking some sort of shot at the team. That does not happen everywhere.

It depends when you read the boards. After a loss or during a bad streak most forums are pretty brutual and during good times they are too high. Go check out the Kentucky board and they shredded their players for the most of this season. We are no different than most team boards, but it is probably worse because we haven't had much good news in the past decade.
 
Our message boards are not a booster club.
Posters are confusing the two. They have different purposes.
The message boards are more akin to talk radio.
 
Also, not for nothing, but while it's true that some posts and threads can be critical of the team, if the players read the boards they would also see 15pgs of people giving prayers for Rysheed's family, 10pgs of congratulations to the Sanchez family, and Dangelo being voted Player of the Game game in and game out.

We're literally their biggest fans. There's good and bad that comes with that.
 
You have to put the tone of this board in context with the performance of the team over the season. This was supposed to be THE breakout year of the Lavin era. We were widely touted as "the most talented team in the Big East." Then reality hit and it was ugly. Media guys like Mike Vacc of the Post and Kieran Darcy of ESPN were writing biting criticisms of the team.

So yeah, if this board is more shrill than, say, the Xavier or Providence boards, it's really no surprise at all.
 
I've read other schools message boards, you are not going to convince me that they are just as bad as us. It's not true. On here and JJ, the boards are flooded by negative posters who ridicule anyone who posts anything positive about the team/coach/certain players. I would say the majority of posts are taking some sort of shot at the team. That does not happen everywhere.

It depends when you read the boards. After a loss or during a bad streak most forums are pretty brutual and during good times they are too high. Go check out the Kentucky board and they shredded their players for the most of this season. We are no different than most team boards, but it is probably worse because we haven't had much good news in the past decade.

Bingo.
 
Our message boards are not a booster club.
Posters are confusing the two. They have different purposes.
The message boards are more akin to talk radio.

Sad but true. Signed, one who considers sports talk radio the sub basement below the sewers of hell.
 
Also, not for nothing, but while it's true that some posts and threads can be critical of the team, if the players read the boards they would also see 15pgs of people giving prayers for Rysheed's family, 10pgs of congratulations to the Sanchez family, and Dangelo being voted Player of the Game game in and game out.

We're literally their biggest fans. There's good and bad that comes with that.
Agree. And for any posts "ripping" a player there are just as many if not more praising the player.
 
Back
Top