Cluess

[quote="Mike Zaun" post=340640][quote="adavis1" post=340636]Not sure how St. John's got left in a situation where the options were either a guy who was using the offer to leverage a raise, or Cluess (who may be fine). Arkansas is a better job so I can accept never getting in on Oats. Washington State may be the worst power 5 job in basketball. Losing Kyle Smith to them without ever getting a crack at him is really annoying.[/quote]

Bama took Oats and he would've come here. When I said we should target him immediately and nab him, I was called impatient and told to relax lol. Oh well, I'll be happy with Cluess.[/quote]

Didn’t Oats sign with Bama before CM resigned?
 
[quote="Monte" post=340649][quote="Mike Zaun" post=340640][quote="adavis1" post=340636]Not sure how St. John's got left in a situation where the options were either a guy who was using the offer to leverage a raise, or Cluess (who may be fine). Arkansas is a better job so I can accept never getting in on Oats. Washington State may be the worst power 5 job in basketball. Losing Kyle Smith to them without ever getting a crack at him is really annoying.[/quote]

Bama took Oats and he would've come here. When I said we should target him immediately and nab him, I was called impatient and told to relax lol. Oh well, I'll be happy with Cluess.[/quote]

Didn’t Oats sign with Bama before CM resigned?[/quote]

Could be wrong but I think it was in the midst of all the CM uncertainty. I would've ended it abruptly. Sorry not sorry. This is a results-oriented business at the end of the day and you must be aggressive.
 
[quote="pmg911" post=340646]Iona released a statement in regards to Cluess

https://t.co/lghwjViFVc[/quote]

Good. The idea that Cluess and Hurley were the only options was preposterous. I will once again remind everyone that at this point in the process after Lavin was fired, Mullin had still not been announced. A couple more days is reasonable for Cragg to do his thing.
 
[quote="buckethead" post=340639]Cluess is yet another settle for a coach move and will continue the downward spiral. I respect what he has done at Iona but he is not the name that is going to get elite talent to come here. He has done well in the MAAC and has made it successfully to the NCAA, to lose everytime. He has done well where he is at. What suddenly makes people think he can bring the elite talent here...our name? It hasn't been what it once was for 15 years. This is a silly, reactionary hire. I hope I am proven wrong. I would love to find myself eating crow...but I doubt I will be.[/quote]

I agree - let's go after another "name", that's been working like a charm the past 10 years.
 
[quote="Mike Zaun" post=340650][quote="Monte" post=340649][quote="Mike Zaun" post=340640][quote="adavis1" post=340636]Not sure how St. John's got left in a situation where the options were either a guy who was using the offer to leverage a raise, or Cluess (who may be fine). Arkansas is a better job so I can accept never getting in on Oats. Washington State may be the worst power 5 job in basketball. Losing Kyle Smith to them without ever getting a crack at him is really annoying.[/quote]

Bama took Oats and he would've come here. When I said we should target him immediately and nab him, I was called impatient and told to relax lol. Oh well, I'll be happy with Cluess.[/quote]

Didn’t Oats sign with Bama before CM resigned?[/quote]

Could be wrong but I think it was in the midst of all the CM uncertainty. I would've ended it abruptly. Sorry not sorry. This is a results-oriented business at the end of the day and you must be aggressive.[/quote]

Would have loved Oats here as well, just saying that it may have been a timing thing. Bama reached out and threw good money at him while there was still uncertainty about whether or not CM would be here next year. At least that’s the way I see it.
 
[quote="Monte" post=340633]

All valid points, but the reality is that few of us know what went on with CM and MC between the end of the year and when CM left. Maybe he asked for a few weeks to let the dust settle and for him to deal with the loss of his brother before discussing the future with MC? Maybe what CM asked for blindsided MC? Who really knows? Furthermore who’s to say that MC hasn’t been making inquiries to other coaches only to be rebuffed? On the surface this seems poorly handled, but again we don’t know what lays beneath the surface. We also don’t know where things stand at the moment with options besides Cluess. Hoping there’s a better candidate still being considered, but if Cluess turns out to be our new HC I’m ok with that[/quote]

Agree 100%, Monte. The issue I'm struggling with is coming up with a hypothetical scenario (since we don't know) where this couldn't have been handled better. We started getting jockeying on social media at about this time last week, so much so that the next day - on a Saturday, so clearly not planned - Cragg released a statement expressing support for Mullin. So at a minimum at that point he's on notice something is brewing. Even if Cragg was completely blind-sided by the Rothstein report and/or anything Mullin did as of Monday night, two things should have immediately occurred in my view:

1. Player's meeting at 8am Tuesday morning with Cragg to address with them completely the coaching situation, whatever it was at the time. Not doing so immediately was bordering on negligent.

2. Whether Bobby was or wasn't target #1, they needed to do something to pump the brakes in the media on it. It was literally Rothstein's next tweet that Bobby was the guy. They didn't control that narrative effectively at all, and at this point even if they GET Bobby it looks messy. This story was getting coverage, there are multiple CBB reporters willing to report leaks, there are ways savvy school administrators could have handled this fairly routinely.

Both of these things should have been done by Tuesday, and it was a massive 0-2 from Cragg. Clearly created player angst on 1, and made us look all or nothing on Bobby on 2 (which likely isn't even true). Very poor job and again even if this was reactive - which Cragg can't control - his reaction is within his control and doesn't seem he put SJU in position to maximize response.
 
Last edited:
Buckethead, imho if you're looking for a coach to come here and recruit "elite talent" you'll be waiting a long time. Pitino is the only one out there who might be able to do that and he is not coming here for many reasons. I think it would be far more realistic to hope for a coach who is able to recruit 2 star, 3 star and 4 star talent and to develop them. You can build a successful program that way. Let's face it, there isn't a coach on the planet who could come here and bring elite talent to St. John's, as much as we all would like that. We just have to be a bit more realistic. Kluess has many local connections to local AAU and HS players. He is well respected and is also a good coach with a good track record. Realistically, I think he is as good an option as we can get.
 
[quote="buckethead" post=340639]Cluess is yet another settle for a coach move and will continue the downward spiral. I respect what he has done at Iona but he is not the name that is going to get elite talent to come here. He has done well in the MAAC and has made it successfully to the NCAA, to lose everytime. He has done well where he is at. What suddenly makes people think he can bring the elite talent here...our name? It hasn't been what it once was for 15 years. This is a silly, reactionary hire. I hope I am proven wrong. I would love to find myself eating crow...but I doubt I will be.[/quote]

I'd spiral down to a guy who has won everywhere and teams dominated the conferences he is in.
 
No one has any idea what's happening behind the scenes yet we're debating what went wrong? Everyone, calm down. There isn't one person on the board who knows what Cragg's strategy was a week ago or today. The guy could have taken the easy route and extended Mullin. He didn't. He realized that it wasn't working and it wasn't going to work. Let's let him do his job before we call him a failure or a fraud. He deserves the benefit of the doubt.
 
[quote="SJU1512" post=340629][quote="mattc" post=340487]Cluess may work out just fine, but I'll never be convinced that Cragg handled this well. You force Mullin out the door and your only two options are Hurley and Cluess, the latter of whom you could hire next year if you're so inclined? This is laughable. I readily admit I don't know all the facts about how this played out, but from where I sit we look once again like a mom and pop store. You HAVE to have a plan B, and it looks like Cragg did not. What a friggin joke. I'm furious.[/quote]


Bingo.

Cluess can win here. Cluess could have ended up being the right hire after going through the right process. But this was not executed properly and likely closed us off to, at a minimum, other options.

Why did it take 3 weeks from our last game for Mullin to "resign"? Unless Mullin out of thin air said he doesn't want to coach anymore - seems unlikely - any scenario after our season ended on March 20 should have been predicted by a seasoned AD. He asked for an extension you didn't want to give him? The sky is also blue.

And if you wanted to push Mullin out, even less explicable to let it drag 3 weeks and end as as messily as it did. That should have been handled swiftly and decisively right when the season ended like a competent program would.

Because Alabama got Oats. Arkansas got Musselman. Nebraska got Hoiberg. I mean goodness, even Nevada was able to quickly and effectively replace Musselman with Alford.

The open market dictates value. If you put all those guys, Bobby Hurley, and Tim Cluess on the market Cluess would be, by an incredibly wide margin, the coach in least demand.

Doesn't mean Cluess isn't a unique fit for SJU in particular. Doesn't mean he can't have more success or stay here longer than some of these other more valued guys. But Tim Cluess was going to be there AFTER you gave yourself an opportunity to look at coaches that are in greater demand to evaluate if they might be a better option for your program. And Cragg didn't even give SJU that chance.

Which is a pathetic and important point. SJU didn't need Cragg to sloppily move on from a program legend, create player angst with mis and non communication, and then hire Cluess. They could promote the most junior administrator in the department to do that.

The problem is 100% not Tim Cluess, who has a lot of things many have clamored for that our prior 3 coaches lacked. This is about SJU's seemingly persistent inability to even come close to entering the ballpark of a coherent process when hiring a men's basketball coach.

One freaking time, just one time, it would be great to at least see if you can get the Oats of a given year when we happen to have an opening. A guy who was a 6 seed at a public university in your own state. Maybe you can'get him! Maybe you can't get any of the guys above who are at big state schools now. Maybe we just can't compete at that level of hiring anymore in general. And that's fine. Then you hire Tim Cluess and maybe even feel great about it.

But at least give yourself a freaking chance to get one of the top guys on the market that cycle. SJU has failed to give itself that opportunity with 4 consecutive hires, which is mind boggling to begin with and frustrating that an AD coming from Duke couldn't change that direction.[/quote]

Do you know for certain what happened between Mullin and Cragg, and how it all went down? As many people have said over and over again, no one knows what went on behind the scenes.

My personal opinion as to what may have happened is that Mullin and Cragg met at the end of the season and discussed what their vision for the program was. Mullin told Cragg that without an extension, it would make his job almost impossible to do (which I don't blame him for). Cragg, at that time, was not ready to give him an extension, and wanted Mullin to go one more year, sort of a prove it year, to evaluate everything and then they could discuss an extension. Obviously Mullin was not happy with that answer, but that's what it was left it. No information from either side that either one was potentially thinking about a change. Fast forward a few weeks and Cragg is informed that Mullin supposedly went over him, and approached Bobby G and others about an extension. That did nothing but piss off Cragg, as any boss would be upset if their employee tried to go over them to get the answer they wanted. As AD, he felt he should be the one making the decisions regarding extensions. That's what he was hired to do. He wants to be in a situation where his employees report directly to him, and no one else, and that did not happen. As a result, Cragg called Mullin in and informed that he would no longer be head coach. But Cragg didn't want to be known as the guy who fired the best player in program history, so he asked Mullin to resign. Mullin then said he would only resign if he was paid the full amount of the remainder of his contract. The whole situation caught all parties off guard, but that is what led us to where we are now.
 
MSP710 wrote: No one has any idea what's happening behind the scenes yet we're debating what went wrong? Everyone, calm down. There isn't one person on the board who knows what Cragg's strategy was a week ago or today. The guy could have taken the easy route and extended Mullin. He didn't. He realized that it wasn't working and it wasn't going to work. Let's let him do his job before we call him a failure or a fraud. He deserves the benefit of the doubt.

+1000
 
[quote="kranmars" post=340647]What I fear most if Cluess is the choice, is he will not get a honeymoon period. It wil not be his fault of course, but he will take the bullets from an angry alum/fanbase.

And I normally give coaches here time to put their stamp on the program before giving my opinion.

But admittedly, I will be one of the frustrated with a Cluess hire, and will have work cut out to in order to keep my composure.[/quote]
If it happens, most will get on board. But, there will not be much patience for lack recruiting and on court performance. Tough position for new coach, but it comes with gig.

The crux of the problem is we will not growing off of our end of year position....chances are we will be effectively starting over...fans don’t want to start over and can’t blame them. I hope I am wrong, but I just don’t see TC coming in and creating a recruiting buzz which is absolutely what we needed in addition to putting those pieces into a system that wins against the type of competition we will face.
 
[quote="Eric Williamson" post=340659]

Do you know for certain what happened between Mullin and Cragg, and how it all went down? As many people have said over and over again, no one knows what went on behind the scenes.[/quote]

I don't have the foggiest idea. There are clearly many possibilities (and yours is a reasonable one). I'm not criticizing Cragg for a scenario that did or didn't occur, I'm just struggling to identify one where I look back at the last week and say "that makes sense, this is definitely how this should have been handled in response." Given how it was handled just as to the players and nothing more I'm not sure such a scenario exists, as I don't think that could have been handled much worse. Hope I'm wrong!
 
I never thought Bobby Hurley was realistic. I will almost never think it's realistic that a coach from a school in a football conference is ever going to come here directly. Heck, Paul Hewitt wouldn't leave an ACC school that didn't really want him around anymore, to come here.

The only coach currently in this conference who did that, was Greg McDermott, who left Iowa State (where he was probably getting fired, since they had 4 straight losing seasons under him) for Creighton, then in the MVC (if I was following Crieghton back then, that would have thrown me for an absolute loop, although I'm sure getting Doug to play there was part of the thinking process).

Dave Leaito was the Coach at Virginia, but he was fired in 2009 (and replaced by Tony Bennett, a move that's worked out pretty well for the Cavaliers). He was an assistant at Tulsa, when Depaul hired him back.

Everybody else in this league was either a head coach at the mid-major level, or an assistant at a major college, or in the NBA (Ewing, and you know he was only interested in one college job). Also, two of the more successful programs of recent years (Providence and Seton Hall) did it with MAAC coaches, for those who say that is not a recipe for success.

Promoting somebody from a lesser league is usually the best chance of getting long-term coaching success. No formula is 100% successful, but since you are likely hiring a proven winner, that's the way we should normally go, IMO. Every single one of these changes we've had (I was too young to understand the process when Mahoney replaced Louie, so I'm not counting that one), I've always pushed for the promotion of a mid-major guy (granted, usually more of an up and comer then Cluess).

If Cragg is guilty of anything, it's that his expectations were a little too high, but it was probably worth a shot, IMO.

Cluess, to me, was always the best of the realistic candidates to coach this team. Ideally, he'd be about 10 years younger then he actually is, but 60 is not ancient, either.
 
Last edited:
[quote="Section3" post=340661][quote="kranmars" post=340647]What I fear most if Cluess is the choice, is he will not get a honeymoon period. It wil not be his fault of course, but he will take the bullets from an angry alum/fanbase.

And I normally give coaches here time to put their stamp on the program before giving my opinion.

But admittedly, I will be one of the frustrated with a Cluess hire, and will have work cut out to in order to keep my composure.[/quote]
If it happens, most will get on board. But, there will not be much patience for lack recruiting and on court performance. Tough position for new coach, but it comes with gig.

The crux of the problem is we will not growing off of our end of year position....chances are we will be effectively starting over...fans don’t want to start over and can’t blame them. I hope I am wrong, but I just don’t see TC coming in and creating a recruiting buzz which is absolutely what we needed in addition to putting those pieces into a system that wins against the type of competition we will face.[/quote]

Recruiting buzz?? Our last staff didn’t even recruit!! Not one of em except Matt. It takes work to land recruits, not a buzz. Buzz has little to do with it.
 
So,Mullin leaves us.in worst shape than any of his predecessors it is really bad if we do not get a coach within the next 48hrs or we will not have a team. Also hope the new coach cleans house gets his own people in place who work hard and can recruits r stars players. We need a coach now that can bring with him not only a great staff but could als bring a few top players with him
 
Judging by how we went from full vote of confidence publicly from the AD to suddenly looking for a new coach within a week, it probably wasn't pretty! Especially considering that Mullin didn't even personally meet with his players to tell them and say goodbye, instead did this from 3,000 miles away. It must have been a fairly nasty meeting.

Sad that our legend and face of the program is now a part of something this ugly, no matter which side you are on. I know one thing, if Cluess is our next coach, this was a cluster-f. Yes, I will support him, but my God, Cluess???
 
[quote="MCNPA" post=340665][quote="Section3" post=340661][quote="kranmars" post=340647]What I fear most if Cluess is the choice, is he will not get a honeymoon period. It wil not be his fault of course, but he will take the bullets from an angry alum/fanbase.

And I normally give coaches here time to put their stamp on the program before giving my opinion.

But admittedly, I will be one of the frustrated with a Cluess hire, and will have work cut out to in order to keep my composure.[/quote]
If it happens, most will get on board. But, there will not be much patience for lack recruiting and on court performance. Tough position for new coach, but it comes with gig.

The crux of the problem is we will not growing off of our end of year position....chances are we will be effectively starting over...fans don’t want to start over and can’t blame them. I hope I am wrong, but I just don’t see TC coming in and creating a recruiting buzz which is absolutely what we needed in addition to putting those pieces into a system that wins against the type of competition we will face.[/quote]

Recruiting buzz?? Our last staff didn’t even recruit!! Not one of em except Matt. It takes work to land recruits, not a buzz. Buzz has little to do with it.[/quote]

overexaggeration. GSJ did a limited amount of recruiting.
 
[quote="Eric Williamson" post=340659][quote="SJU1512" post=340629][quote="mattc" post=340487]Cluess may work out just fine, but I'll never be convinced that Cragg handled this well. You force Mullin out the door and your only two options are Hurley and Cluess, the latter of whom you could hire next year if you're so inclined? This is laughable. I readily admit I don't know all the facts about how this played out, but from where I sit we look once again like a mom and pop store. You HAVE to have a plan B, and it looks like Cragg did not. What a friggin joke. I'm furious.[/quote]


Bingo.

Cluess can win here. Cluess could have ended up being the right hire after going through the right process. But this was not executed properly and likely closed us off to, at a minimum, other options.

Why did it take 3 weeks from our last game for Mullin to "resign"? Unless Mullin out of thin air said he doesn't want to coach anymore - seems unlikely - any scenario after our season ended on March 20 should have been predicted by a seasoned AD. He asked for an extension you didn't want to give him? The sky is also blue.

And if you wanted to push Mullin out, even less explicable to let it drag 3 weeks and end as as messily as it did. That should have been handled swiftly and decisively right when the season ended like a competent program would.

Because Alabama got Oats. Arkansas got Musselman. Nebraska got Hoiberg. I mean goodness, even Nevada was able to quickly and effectively replace Musselman with Alford.

The open market dictates value. If you put all those guys, Bobby Hurley, and Tim Cluess on the market Cluess would be, by an incredibly wide margin, the coach in least demand.

Doesn't mean Cluess isn't a unique fit for SJU in particular. Doesn't mean he can't have more success or stay here longer than some of these other more valued guys. But Tim Cluess was going to be there AFTER you gave yourself an opportunity to look at coaches that are in greater demand to evaluate if they might be a better option for your program. And Cragg didn't even give SJU that chance.

Which is a pathetic and important point. SJU didn't need Cragg to sloppily move on from a program legend, create player angst with mis and non communication, and then hire Cluess. They could promote the most junior administrator in the department to do that.

The problem is 100% not Tim Cluess, who has a lot of things many have clamored for that our prior 3 coaches lacked. This is about SJU's seemingly persistent inability to even come close to entering the ballpark of a coherent process when hiring a men's basketball coach.

One freaking time, just one time, it would be great to at least see if you can get the Oats of a given year when we happen to have an opening. A guy who was a 6 seed at a public university in your own state. Maybe you can'get him! Maybe you can't get any of the guys above who are at big state schools now. Maybe we just can't compete at that level of hiring anymore in general. And that's fine. Then you hire Tim Cluess and maybe even feel great about it.

But at least give yourself a freaking chance to get one of the top guys on the market that cycle. SJU has failed to give itself that opportunity with 4 consecutive hires, which is mind boggling to begin with and frustrating that an AD coming from Duke couldn't change that direction.[/quote]

Do you know for certain what happened between Mullin and Cragg, and how it all went down? As many people have said over and over again, no one knows what went on behind the scenes.

My personal opinion as to what may have happened is that Mullin and Cragg met at the end of the season and discussed what their vision for the program was. Mullin told Cragg that without an extension, it would make his job almost impossible to do (which I don't blame him for). Cragg, at that time, was not ready to give him an extension, and wanted Mullin to go one more year, sort of a prove it year, to evaluate everything and then they could discuss an extension. Obviously Mullin was not happy with that answer, but that's what it was left it. No information from either side that either one was potentially thinking about a change. Fast forward a few weeks and Cragg is informed that Mullin supposedly went over him, and approached Bobby G and others about an extension. That did nothing but piss off Cragg, as any boss would be upset if their employee tried to go over them to get the answer they wanted. As AD, he felt he should be the one making the decisions regarding extensions. That's what he was hired to do. He wants to be in a situation where his employees report directly to him, and no one else, and that did not happen. As a result, Cragg called Mullin in and informed that he would no longer be head coach. But Cragg didn't want to be known as the guy who fired the best player in program history, so he asked Mullin to resign. Mullin then said he would only resign if he was paid the full amount of the remainder of his contract. The whole situation caught all parties off guard, but that is what led us to where we are now.[/quote]

Wow, no one would have EVER predicted a scenario like this could have occurred especially with a prideful coach facing fan unrest, least of all someone with 30 years of athletic dept experience.
 
Cooley of Providence is often deified on this Board for getting his teams to finish mostly in the middle of the pack in the BE . This year being a down year for sure . Cooley made his bones at Fairfield in the MAAC Conference , same as Iona . Cluess and his teams have dominated that Conference since he took that job from Willard . The point being that Tim can Coach ! If he comes here, he likely would win too. Would he keep Figgy, Heron, Williams , Roberts , Earlington plus the sit out transfers ? If he does and adds a 5 th year Grad who can shoot , we might not be the door mat nrxt year that everyone is predicting . Going forward , he can probably get us to a Winning level in the BE , with the 3 and 4 star players like Cooley does at PC . Maybe Tim even gets the 5 star kid , once in a while too .
 
Back
Top