He can be manipulated and controlled.How in the world does a guy from the SWAC, a conference that shouldn't even have an automatic bid be in charge?
He can be manipulated and controlled.
Sad but true.He can be manipulated and controlled.
We know - you still think the ACC is a thingOk. No idea how this works .
That all sounds right. So the answer to my question is that conference members get millions of dollars extra when their conference mates do well? None of your good points prevent the Ncaa from screwing us again next year and sending the $ and bids to their favored conferences again, right? Sorry, I didn't see the above post. Thanks.It would make the selection committee look bad, net every school in the conference several millions of dollars, help keep top schools from bolting, and it would sweeten the upcoming TV deal significantly.
Plus, help recruiting, league reputation, and a hundred other things.
Thanks. This explains everything and makes the reason for the snub crystal clear. The Ncaa has NO incentive what so ever to give out bids fairly and every incentive to give them to their favorite conferences. "Cause it's all about money ain't a damn thing funny, you gotta have a con in this land of milk and honey."We know - you still think the ACC is a thing
For payouts, this is a decent summary:
March Madness payouts: NCAA's 'unit' system rewards successful conferences
Conferences make money for each game a school plays in, not including the National Championshipwww.deseret.com
In case anyone still wondered where all this is heading:We know - you still think the ACC is a thing
For payouts, this is a decent summary:
March Madness payouts: NCAA's 'unit' system rewards successful conferences
Conferences make money for each game a school plays in, not including the National Championshipwww.deseret.com
Izzo running around saying the same thing.In case anyone still wondered where all this is heading:
SEC commissioner Greg Sankey told ESPN last week that he now favors potentially eliminating automatic qualifiers for smaller conferences, particularly in the wake of Power 5 conference expansion.
“We are giving away highly competitive opportunities for automatic qualifiers (from smaller conferences), and I think that pressure is going to rise as we have more competitive basketball leagues at the top end because of expansion,” Sankey said.
It’s a shame. So much of the excitement of the Dance, for me anyway, is watching teams like St Peters or Loyola Chicago take down Goliath.Izzo running around saying the same thing.
Izzo running around saying the same thing.
It’s always Tit for Tat with themIf you left the NCAA in charge of the world's most perfect set of boobs, they would perform unnecessary surgery and tattoo them. Probably with the words SEC and Big 10 in script.
It’s always Tit for Tat with them
In case anyone still wondered where all this is heading:
SEC commissioner Greg Sankey told ESPN last week that he now favors potentially eliminating automatic qualifiers for smaller conferences, particularly in the wake of Power 5 conference expansion.
“We are giving away highly competitive opportunities for automatic qualifiers (from smaller conferences), and I think that pressure is going to rise as we have more competitive basketball leagues at the top end because of expansion,” Sankey said.
I do think every AQ should be in the field of 64 without a play-in. But I do think outside of the Top 32 (or I guess Top 28 for bracket purposes) and the AQs, those other teams are usually a mis-mash.Just go to 72. Make all of the 16 seeds and then the last 8 at large bids play the play-in games. Tournament will largely stay the same. If anything, you may get more upsets as the quality of the 13-15 seeds improve as they will no longer be one of the bottom 8 teams in the field.