Class of 72
Active member
Bringing them back would be great for the league. The expectation must be that they will try to jump ship again when an opportunity arises that is more profitable. A costly escape clause should be a requirement for re-entry. Bring in Dayton with them and settle for a league of 12.
Can't stand them, but UConn joining the Big East would only make the conference stronger -- which is preferable to making one the power conferences stronger. We shouldn't be so fast to cut off our nose to spite our face. Agree, a super costly escape clause -- and a very hefty entry fee -- would be mandatory. And if they opt out in 10 years, so be it. In the meanwhile, their membership in the BE (along with Dayton or another solid program) would only make the BE, and not one of the Big 5 conferences, stronger.
One of those sounds logical things that you need to dig a little deeper. There is a reason why Yukon's first, second and third choices have spurned them. They see the same logic but they are wiser.
Yes, the reason is they are football conferences where the basketball revenue is secondary. Doesn't apply to the BE obviously.
NCAA football wealth is a myth. It applies to +/- 10 programs. Even within conference for those schools the benefit is not a net profit to everyone else. There are so many other reasons that schools and conferences push football and all athletics. As long as it it funded by taxpayers, the game is to feed the machine. Yukon with unlimited state funds and a massive commitment to infrastructure is bottom line attractive whether it is pulling in 10k to a stadium or 50k.
Aside from that there is an unspoken resentment towards the historical relationship between Yukon and ESPN. Schools with a memory are leery and will always consider it suspect. Yukon is also looked upon nationwide as a dirty player. These things factor no matter how much pragmatists want to ignore them as irrelevant. The ACC has not spurned Yukon for financial reasons and ultimately they'll probably suck them in reluctantly since they increasingly resemble the SEC rather than the Ivy League in terms of standards.
If the ACC sucks them in it would only be due to politicians pressuring ESPN because of the tax breaks from operating in the state of Connecticut but even that could backfire since North Carolina could offer them prime real estate in the triangle. It would not be due to football potential where Uconn fudge their attendance where actual attendance is usually 20% lower than announced attendance. It's football would place them at the very bottom of the ACC and although their revenue would increase over many years over the pittance they get now losing a bundle of tax payer money there is no guarantee they will ever operate in the black in football. While they would remain competitive in basketball their football program may be condemned to 16th place forever. I would think long and hard if I were a Connecticut tax payer and a football fan in particular.